“I don't have anything substantive to say yet, so I'm filling time with a procedural request.”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2
The Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 is a massive bill implementing various tax measures, changes to procurement rules, and amendments to several Acts. During the debate, the Conservatives expressed concerns about the lack of transparency and increased government powers. They also criticized the government's handling of military procurement. However, much of the discussion revolved around personal anecdotes, partisan jabs, and unrelated topics like grocery prices.
“I want people to blame the current government for their problems. I'll remind them of some bad things that happened and say my party would be different.”
“The other party is completely out of touch. It's their fault Canadians are in pain. They should apologize.”
“Restaurants are closing because of high taxes and burdens from the Liberal government. I want the government to stop taxing small businesses so much. We should get rid of the excise tax on beverages completely. I've been saying this for a while now.”
“No, I disagree. My party knows the real problem. The other party drove away investment and competition. Free market competition lowers prices. We would get rid of the carbon tax, fuel standards, and other taxes that make food cost more.”
“I want to talk about one part of a big bill. It's a bad change. It gives a new minister power to spend $1 billion with no oversight. It needs its own bill, not this big mess. The government set up a new agency. They hired a banker with no defence experience to run it. It's just another layer of red tape. It won't get the military the equipment they need. It's just more bureaucracy. The top priority must be getting the military the right equipment. The government keeps adding more red tape and cost. They say a lot but do nothing. The military needs action, not more agencies. The military needs new equipment and maintenance. The bill locks in all the problems with the new agency. It adds more boards and patronage jobs. It has more ways to avoid competition for contracts. It has strange definitions and no transparency. It lets the minister control companies. It sounds like nationalization and overreach, like the Emergencies Act. I want to change the bill to address the real problems.”
“The other guy is pretending defence spending is higher by counting unrelated things. He counts veteran pensions, all of the Coast Guard, Transport planes, everything he can. But a lot of reservists never got the raise to begin with. Even the troops who did get a raise are losing it all back to rent. So remember, their 'higher' spending is fake. When we were in charge, the true number was really 1.5%.”
“The government is bad at buying military equipment. The Liberals take too long to buy guns and there aren't enough supplies for training or missions abroad. They aren't ready for future wars.”
“Madam Speaker, I remember my colleague questioned military generals at public accounts committee. The Liberals keep changing their mind on the F-35 and delaying procurement. If it's going to take 15 years, when will the money actually be spent?”
“Madam Speaker, Justin Trudeau said he wouldn't buy the F-35. But it won every competition on cost, lethality, survivability, and interoperability. Now the Prime Minister is playing politics with the jet we need to protect Canada and work with allies.”