Adjournment Proceedings

In adjournment proceedings, Conservative MP Grant Jackson questioned the government about why no Manitoba projects appear on its list of major national projects, pointing to the province’s potential in ports, mining, farming and defence, and asking the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs for her plan. Liberal parliamentary secretary Ryan Turnbull replied that the government is working with Manitoba, noted pre-budget consultations with the province’s finance minister, cited cost-of-living measures such as tax cuts and grocery support, and said the Major Projects Office works with provinces and First Nations to advance projects meeting national criteria. Jackson pressed again, noting other provinces have between two and eight projects listed while Manitoba has none, and Turnbull said Manitoba is a priority and invited the member to bring forward more project proposals for consideration.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“The Liberal government is ignoring Manitoba when it funds major projects. Our province has great potential in ports, mining, farming, and defence. I want the minister to explain her plan for major projects in Manitoba.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise again to ask my fellow Manitoban, the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs, and Manitoba’s only voice at the cabinet table, about the complete lack of major projects and development happening in Manitoba under the Liberal government. The minister’s response to my initial question about major projects coming to Manitoba, or the lack thereof, can be described as light at best. Where are the Manitoba Liberals? They are completely missing in action. Conservatives in Manitoba understand the potential of our great province. We have been pushing opportunities at the Port of Churchill for years, including in multiple campaign platforms. We know that more opportunities exist in expanding our mining industry, and the same is true for the potential in value-added agriculture and processing. As the heart of Canada, Manitoba is geographically positioned to play an even greater role in our national defence industry as well. Manitoba has all of this potential, yet where is the Liberal government’s ambition for its development? On what significant new projects is it working on to bring growth and investment to Manitobans? So far, Manitoba has been a flyover province for the Liberal major projects announcement machine. Will the minister get up and put on the record what her vision is for expanding major projects happening in friendly Manitoba?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our government is working with Manitoba on its major projects. Life is more expensive right now because of global conflicts and American trade tariffs. We are helping Canadians by cutting taxes on fuel, income, and first-time home purchases, and by giving low-income families extra money for groceries.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 8 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know I have colleagues on this side from Manitoba who are really fantastic. They work hard and represent some of the ridings in Manitoba quite well. I will also say that this summer, in the pre-budget consultations, I had the opportunity to meet with Manitoba’s finance minister and talk about many of the major projects in Manitoba. Our government is supportive and is serious about working with Manitoba to advance its interests, help grow its economy and take advantage of the significant opportunities that it sees for itself and for Canada as a whole. Countries around the world are grappling with an affordability crisis, and Canada is no exception. Political unrest and ongoing conflicts on two continents are taking their toll. Here at home, our closest neighbour and largest trading partner has placed tariffs on many Canadian goods entering the U.S. market, placing jobs and prosperity at risk. The cumulative effect of this disruption is higher prices for many essential goods. This is having an impact on Canadians and the businesses that support them. While the situation originated beyond our borders, our government is standing up for Canadians. We are taking strong, decisive action to address affordability concerns by introducing measures that lower costs and keep more hard-earned dollars in the pockets of Canadians. One of the most recent of these involves the federal fuel excise tax on gasoline, aviation fuel, diesel fuel and others. In April of this year, we introduced a temporary suspension, lowering the tax per litre for gasoline by 10¢, while the tax on leaded gasoline fell by 11¢ per litre, and the tax on diesel and aviation fuel fell by four cents per litre. This temporary suspension was going to expire on September 7, Labour Day. Before it could end, however, we announced our intention to extend the temporary pause until January 31, 2027, and after that date, regular rates would be reduced by 50% until March 31, fiscal year end. We have also taken action on grocery prices with the Canada groceries and essentials benefit announced at the beginning of the year. This benefit replaces the GST credit and provides tax-free quarterly payments to individuals and families with low and modest incomes to help manage the rising cost of living. In July 2026, there was a 25% increase to the benefit amount, which will remain for five years. Canadians can expect the amount of this benefit to be recalculated every July based on their adjusted family net income from the previous year. We have also waived taxes on first-time home purchases at the federal level. That is significant. It is about $50,000 on a $1-million home. These measures are on top of an income tax cut we announced last year where we lowered the tax rate for the first marginal personal income tax bracket from 15% to 14%, saving over 22 million Canadians money on their taxes. That is $840 for the average dual income family or $420 per individual. We have cut taxes on income, housing and fuel, and offered a groceries and essentials benefit to help ease the pressures that families are under based on the cost of living. I would say that is progress. In response to the member opposite’s question about Manitoba, we are serious about building all across Canada and working with Manitoba every step of the way.

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“The government has 20 major projects on its official list, but not one is in Manitoba. Other provinces have between two and eight projects. When will the government start prioritizing major projects in Manitoba?”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Respect 89 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “what an embarrassingly out-of-touch response that was from the parliamentary secretary.”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what an embarrassingly out-of-touch response that was from the parliamentary secretary. I asked about specific, tangible, physical projects that the Liberal government is pursuing for my home province, and all the member had to offer was that he visited it one time and had a 30-minute chat with the finance minister at the provincial level. How typical of the out-of-touch Liberals to forget about the province of Manitoba. Here are a couple of facts for the member. According to its own website, there are 20 major projects with the Major Projects Office. How many of those 20 major projects are in Manitoba? Not one. The port of Churchill plus is Manitoba’s only specifically identified initiative, and the government classifies it as a “transformative strategy”, not a major project, with absolutely zero details listed. Meanwhile, other provinces have eight, three or two projects listed. When will the Liberal government and the six Liberal MPs prioritize major projects in Manitoba?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Manitoba is a priority for our government. We set up an office to move big national projects forward, and we are working with First Nations and provincial premiers. I want the member to bring us more projects so we can speed them up.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 33 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Manitoba is without exception a priority for this government, and I am sure it is a priority to the Premier of Manitoba. There are projects and opportunities that we recognize. The Major Projects Office has been set up to advance projects in the national interest that meet the criteria. Transformative strategies are nothing to be ashamed of. Those are excellent projects as well, and there are quite a number of them. In fact, the projects across Canada that we are advancing, in partnership with first nations and the premiers of each province, are good news for this country’s prosperity in the future. We look forward to expediting those projects as soon as the member and his colleagues bring forward more projects that we can advance.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 156

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 105 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Housing 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 8 statements
  10. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Government Appointments 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Marine Transportation 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Business of Supply 41 statements
  20. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Business of Supply 17 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Committees of the House 2 statements
  24. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 4 statements
  25. Orders of the Day Concurrence in Committee Reports 71 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements