The Economy

Question Period on the economy focused on the Prime Minister’s spending on meals during official flights. Conservative members said taxpayers’ money had been spent on expensive in-flight catering, citing figures like $17,000 on salmon over three flights and close to $1 million across 14 trips, and contrasted this with food bank use and cost-of-living pressures they attributed to Liberal policies. Liberal ministers, including Steven MacKinnon and François-Philippe Champagne, pointed to trade wars and conflicts abroad, said the Prime Minister was representing Canada in negotiations that bring investment and jobs, and described government investments in infrastructure, housing, business and defence; some also objected to the tone of the questions, and members offered condolences for a fallen first responder.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

10 statements

Jasraj Hallan, Calgary East

Conservative
“The Prime Minister spent $17,000 of public money on salmon during just three flights. That is as much as a family spends on food in a whole year.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister stuffed his face with $17,000 of salmon on just three taxpayer-funded flights. That is as much as a family will spend— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Jasraj Hallan, Calgary East

Conservative
“The Prime Minister spent too much tax money on flight catering, including thousands of dollars on salmon and ninety-four thousand dollars on one trip to Rome. This is unfair when millions of Canadians must use food banks.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister spent 17,000 dollars’ worth of salmon on just three taxpayer-funded flights. That is as much as a family will spend on groceries for the entire year. While sending 2.2 million Canadians to a food bank every single month, is it fair that he stuffed his face with $94,000 of catering on just one flight to Rome, when that is how much five families spend on groceries for the entire year?

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“People look down on how politicians act in the House of Commons.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, people wonder why people look down on the antics in the House of Commons— An hon. member: It’s a $200,000 catering bill there, Steve.

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“We are mourning the death of a first responder today. The official opposition should ask better, more serious questions instead of playing politics.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 9 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on a day when we are mourning the loss of a first responder, people should really wonder, as they look on the House of Commons, why folks look down on some of the antics here, when we follow up such a constructive exchange with something penned quite obviously from the desk of the Leader of the Opposition. I expect 30 more of those today. Let us just hope they can up their game a bit.

Jasraj Hallan, Calgary East

Conservative

Linked statement

“Millions of Canadians rely on food banks because of the government's failed policies. It is unfair that the Prime Minister spends public money on expensive meals while Canadians struggle.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there is no need to politicize the loss of the police officer. We are asking questions on behalf of the 2.2 million Canadians waiting in a food bank line because of failed Liberal policies, and now 40% of Canadians are losing sleep. Do members know who is not losing sleep? The Prime Minister, who is enjoying fine dining on the taxpayer dime, is not losing sleep. Is it fair that the Prime Minister gets to live lavishly on the taxpayer dime while sending more Canadians to the food bank every single month?

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The world is facing trade disputes and wars in Europe and the Middle East. The Prime Minister is working with other countries to bring back deals and investments that create Canadian jobs.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “We are in the midst of a trade war.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since June 9.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as Canadians know all too well, we are in the midst of a trade war. We are in the midst of negotiating some of the most signal world events that we have seen in a generation, including two wars, one in the Middle East and one in Europe. Our Prime Minister is representing our country proudly on the international stage. When he goes there, he comes home with agreements, with deals and with investments that give opportunity to Canadians, that supply jobs to Canadians and that help us get things done for Canadians so we can ensure our prosperity.

Pierre Paul-Hus, Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles

Conservative
“Canadians are struggling to afford food and everyday costs. At the same time, the Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on airplane food for 14 trips. I want to know if he thinks that is a responsible use of taxpayers' money.”
  • A repeated line

    “People are struggling to make ends meet.”

    Said 13 times by 10 members since April 27.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when the Prime Minister left his job as the chair of Brookfield in New York to come to Canada, he forgot that he was no longer working for a private company but for Canadian taxpayers. Right now, Canadians are going through a recession. They are paying more for everything, and millions are struggling to make ends meet. Meanwhile, government documents show that the Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on inflight catering for just 14 trips. While families have to watch every penny they spend at the grocery store, does the Prime Minister really think that spending $1 million on inflight meals is a responsible use of taxpayers’ money?

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Prime Minister is doing a good job representing Canada in world trade talks during a hard time. His work brings jobs and investment to Canadians, and he should keep going.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 31 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 25 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians watch the proceedings of the House, and I do not think that they appreciate that accusatory tone. Canadians know full well that we are in the midst of intense trade negotiations. There are wars in Europe and in the Middle East. The Prime Minister proudly represents us. He is bringing back agreements, investments and opportunities for Canadians across the country. We are proud of our Prime Minister. We are proud of the efforts that he is making on the international stage, and I hope he will keep going.

Pierre Paul-Hus, Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles

Conservative
“The Prime Minister spends an average of $70,000 on food and drinks for each trip. How can he defend spending this taxpayer money when food bank use is higher than ever?”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 64 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “it must be hard for the Prime Minister to get used to life in the public service after having enjoyed the perks”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the tone I used was appropriate, considering how wasteful the party across the way has been all these years. I know that it must be hard for the Prime Minister to get used to life in the public service after having enjoyed the perks of working for a private company like Brookfield. However, it is important to understand that each trip costs an average of $70,000 in food and drink. That is not the cost of the plane, nor is it the cost of fuel; it is just the bill for food and drink. At a time when food banks are seeing greater demand than ever, how can the Prime Minister justify this to Canadian taxpayers?

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I send my sympathies to the family and friends of Constable Marc Pinizzotto. Our government is investing in infrastructure, housing, business, and defence to bring more money into Canada.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 21 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would also like to offer my sympathies to the family and friends of Constable Marc Pinizzotto. The thoughts of every member of the House go out to him and his family today. To answer my colleague’s question, our government is making generational investments in infrastructure, housing, competitiveness, innovation and defence. Every member of our government is working on attracting investment, and the Prime Minister is making Canadians proud not just here at home, but around the world.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 134

  1. Government Orders Government Business No. 11—Proceedings on Bill C-26 11 statements
  2. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Northern Affairs 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Seniors 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  15. Oral Questions Seniors 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Telecommunications 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Access to Information 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Economy 3 statements
  21. Oral Questions Marine Transportation 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions National Defence 3 statements
  23. Oral Questions International Trade 5 statements
  24. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  25. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 2 statements
  26. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 5 statements
  27. Government Orders Strong and Free Elections Act 34 statements
  28. Oral Questions Seniors 2 statements
  29. Government Orders Business of the House 2 statements
  30. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 2 statements
  31. Oral Questions Firearms 2 statements
  32. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  33. Oral Questions Government Appointments 2 statements
  34. Private Members' Business National Framework on the Durability of Electronic Products and Essential Home Appliances Act 8 statements
  35. Government Orders Strong and Free Elections Act 29 statements
  36. Government Orders Combatting Hate Act 7 statements
  37. Government Orders Government Orders 11 statements
  38. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  39. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  40. Government Orders Government Orders 19 statements