Government Business No. 9—Changes to Standing Orders

A motion to change the House’s Standing Orders for the 45th Parliament so that parliamentary committees include 12 members, with two additional seats added for the governing party, giving the Liberals a majority on all committees. The government House leader argued that a majority in the House should traditionally mean a majority on committees and that chairs should not have to break tie votes; he said no opposition seats would be removed. Conservatives opposed, arguing the majority came from MPs who crossed the floor rather than elections, and sought an amendment to preserve opposition chairs of oversight committees on spending, operations and ethics. The Bloc Québécois said it would vote against the motion, objecting that it was presented without consultation and gives the government more seats than its House proportion would warrant, though members noted collaboration on bills had otherwise been working. Some Liberal members cited delays to bills such as bail reform and lawful access legislation in defending the change.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green
“Members of Parliament from small parties should have the same rights as everyone else. No rule says we cannot sit on committees. I want to know why the government is giving money to the NDP instead of making sure their members can sit on committees.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this gives us a chance to look at something again. The recognized party status rules were created by law in 1963 to do one thing only, which was to provide funding to parties that have at least 12 members of Parliament in the House. That law said nothing about changing the rights that each member of Parliament has vis-à-vis each other. As the leader of the Green Party of Canada with a seat for Saanich—Gulf Islands, I should in theory have equal rights to those of every other member of the House, because the 1963 rule did not say, and no rule has ever said, that members of Parliament from parties with fewer than 12 MPs cannot sit on committees. I verified this quite recently with the clerk to make sure. As the clerk described it, it is a practice of long standing, not a rule. Why has the government decided it is okay to provide funding to the NDP members but not to ensure that those very fine members sit on committees?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 109

  1. Government Orders Government Orders 122 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  3. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 3 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 7 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions International Trade 10 statements
  14. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  15. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  17. Oral Questions Mental Health and Addictions 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Infrastructure 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Pharmacare 3 statements
  21. Oral Questions Business of the House 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Government Business No. 9—Changes to Standing Orders 64 statements
  23. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  24. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  25. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  26. Oral Questions Finance 3 statements
  27. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  28. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  29. Private Members' Business National Framework on Skilled Trades and Labour Mobility Act 12 statements
  30. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  31. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  32. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements