Public Safety

Question period dealt with public safety matters. Conservative members asked the government to release a memorandum of understanding on security co-operation with China, saying the Prime Minister had called Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat before signing it, and pressed for answers on foreign interference. The Liberal minister said Canada has had similar agreements with China since 2010, none of which have been made public, and that the government follows the advice of intelligence and law enforcement agencies before releasing sensitive documents. Other Conservative members raised home invasions and repeat offenders, calling on the government to keep such offenders in jail. The Liberal ministers replied that the government has introduced a number of public safety bills to toughen bail and sentencing, that provinces need to fund their courts properly, and said the Conservatives are holding up a bill that would give police more tools; the Lawful Access Act, 2026, on police access to electronic data, was referred to in this connection.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative
“The Prime Minister signed a security deal with China, even though he called China our biggest security threat. I have asked to see this deal for five months. When will the government release it?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister called Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat. That was during the election. Despite this, within a year, he signed a memorandum of understanding with Communist China as it relates to security matters. I have been asking for that memorandum of understanding for over five months. The minister and the Prime Minister have refused to disclose it. When will they produce the memorandum of understanding that was signed with Communist China?

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative
“The Prime Minister called China a huge security threat, but then signed a deal with them anyway. Foreign interference is worse than ever. I want the government to tell Canadians the truth about it today.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if the minister wants to talk about history, let us talk about history. When in the past did a Prime Minister call Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat, and then within a year sign a memorandum of understanding? Never before had we heard stories of foreign interference to the same degree. Never before had a Prime Minister said exactly what he said. Why is he unprepared to shine the light? The Liberals do not want to shine the light and they do not want to inform Canadians. Will they do it today, yes or no?

Connie Cody, Cambridge

Conservative
“Canadians do not feel safe in their homes. Repeat offenders are breaking in and hurting people. I want the government to keep these criminals in jail instead of letting them back out.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one year ago, Canadians did not feel safe on their own streets. After a year of the same old Liberal government, they are now afraid in their own homes. In Cambridge, people are being attacked where they sleep. A 60-year-old senior was assaulted in his own home. A homeowner had his wallet taken while the offenders also tried to steal his car. In the middle of the night, a woman was sexually assaulted by a stranger who broke into her home. This is what happens when repeat offenders are let back out instead of being kept behind bars. Canadians are paying the price. How much worse does it have to get before these Liberals stop letting criminals cycle through the system and start keeping Canadians safe in their own homes?

Connie Cody, Cambridge

Conservative
“Liberal laws let repeat offenders out of jail too easily. Police have to keep arresting the same criminals over and over. I want the government to change this and keep criminals behind bars.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal minister just told Canadians to feel safer because they proposed a band-aid for a system they broke. Canadians do not need another paper promise. They need to be safe in their own homes. The Liberal government’s soft-on-crime laws let repeat offenders walk free and come right back through Canadians’ front doors. Police are forced to arrest the same offenders again and again because the system keeps letting them out. Criminals are not getting the message and are getting bolder because they know they will not face real consequences. A system that will not keep them behind bars is not protection. It is failure. It is like putting a screen door on a submarine; it is completely useless. When will they shut down this revolving door and start protecting Canadians?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 123

  1. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  2. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Climate Change 7 statements
  4. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 7 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 11 statements
  10. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 11 statements
  17. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  18. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 12 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements