Intergovernmental Affairs

During question period on intergovernmental affairs, the Bloc Québécois leader asked about the Prime Minister’s comment that a 50-percent-plus-one referendum result on Quebec sovereignty would not be clear, noting that Quebec’s National Assembly passed a motion disagreeing, and asked whether the government would defend Quebeckers’ right to decide their own future. The Liberal minister responded that the government’s position was unchanged from earlier in the week, said the Bloc was trying to create division, and pointed to the government’s work with Quebec’s government, businesses, and workers, including co-operation with all parties on responding to U.S. tariffs.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“The Prime Minister said a 50 percent plus one vote for Quebec independence is not clear enough. Quebec's legislature voted against his comment. I want to know where Liberal MPs from Quebec stand on this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, drawing on his deep understanding of Quebec, the Prime Minister, who said a few months ago that the Battle of the Plains of Abraham was just one big hug fest, very clearly told us yesterday that he thinks a majority of 50% plus one on sovereignty issues is unclear. In that case, I think we ought to start by overturning the 1995 referendum and starting all over. Evidently, this time he should have minded his own business. The Quebec National Assembly reminded him of that with a unanimous motion. There are about 170 Liberal members here, about 40 of whom are from Quebec. I want to know if the members—

Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade, and One Canadian Economy

Liberal

Linked statement

“My answer has not changed since earlier this week. The Bloc Québécois is trying to start fights. We are focused on working with Quebec's government, businesses, and workers on things that matter to them.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 33 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 27 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, perhaps I can help the leader of the Bloc Québécois. I think I know what question he was going to ask. The answer is the same as it was earlier this week. I realize that the Bloc Québécois members are experts at picking fights, sowing division and creating controversy where none exists. As my colleagues just said, we are fundamentally focused on issues that matter to Quebeckers and all Canadians. We are trying to work with the Quebec government, as well as with businesses and workers in Quebec and across Canada. That remains our priority, and things are going well.

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“Quebec's legislature agrees that Quebeckers have the right to make their own choices about their future. I am asking the Prime Minister if the federal government will defend that right.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Quebec National Assembly was unanimous in not sharing that view. Some people support sovereignty. Others are on the fence. Some people say they want it later, and some do not want it at all. However, Quebeckers all agree that they have the right to make their own decisions, 30 years on from the shenanigans surrounding the previous referendum. Are the Prime Minister and the government telling Quebeckers that they should not count on Ottawa to defend democracy and their rights and that they can only count on their own will as Quebeckers?

Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade, and One Canadian Economy

Liberal
“The Bloc Québécois is trying to create division. We are already working with all MPs to deal with unfair U.S. tariffs and protect Canadian workers and businesses. I want the Bloc to work with us instead.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we understand that the Bloc Québécois is once again trying to create division and controversy where there is none. As the leader of the Bloc Québécois is well aware, we are working with our Bloc colleagues and with all MPs to find ways to address the U.S. tariff threat and support the businesses and workers across Canada that are dealing with completely unjustified tariff threats. We will continue to do this work and I would like the Bloc Québécois to work with us on these issues that are important to Quebec.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 123

  1. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  2. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Climate Change 7 statements
  4. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 7 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 11 statements
  10. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 11 statements
  17. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  18. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 12 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements