TranslatePolitics.ca

Recent debates

8 latest topics

06-18 Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 57 statements 06-18 Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 19 statements 06-18 Arab Heritage Month Act 5 statements 06-18 The Economy 15 statements 06-18 Government Priorities 2 statements 06-18 Government Priorities 2 statements 06-18 Housing 12 statements 06-18 The Environment 2 statements

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

2026-05-25 Sitting 121 Showing 1–1 of 1

In Routine Proceedings, a Conservative MP presented a petition about the government's proposed restrictions on eligibility for the Canada student grant for full-time students. The petitioners were concerned that the government was attacking vocational institutions by limiting the grant to students attending public or non-profit institutions. No other substantive topics were discussed.

Official Hansard ↗

Garnett Genuis

Conservative 3:45 p.m.

“I want taxpayers to spend money on students at private career colleges. The government is changing the rules. They'll give money to university students, but they won't give it to students at vocational schools. That's not fair. Chinese medicine and skilled trades are good. Young people should get taxpayer money to study whatever job the market wants. The government shouldn't pick favorites.”

Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the next petition I am presenting highlights the concerns of Canadians about the government's attack on vocational institutions. Budget 2025 proposed restricting eligibility for the Canada student grant for full-time students to those attending public or not-for-profit institutions, excluding many students at regulated career colleges. These are reputable institutions that provide important vocational training, providing skills to young people that align with the needs of the labour market, and yet the government is changing the situation such that any program at a university entitles one to make an application for student grants if they meet the financial need criteria, whereas no students would be eligible if they are at vocational institutions, outside of narrowly prescribed exceptions. This creates unequal treatment among students based on the type of institution they attend rather than the value or demand of their chosen field of study. For many in-demand careers, including in the skilled trades and in health care fields including, for instance, traditional Chinese medicine, the training is offered through regulated career colleges. Removing grant eligibility risks reducing access to affordable training for students, particularly those from low and middle-income backgrounds, and limiting support for these programs may worsen existing labour shortages in critical sectors of the Canadian economy. Petitioners call on the Government of Canada to reverse the proposed changes, to ensure equal and fair access to student financial assistance for all students regardless of institution type and to support training pathways that align with labour market needs, including skilled trades and other high-demand professions.

View on ourcommons.ca ↗

What they said. What they meant.

Recent debates