“I'm the government. I want to shut down debate on my housing bill. We should vote without more talk.”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Build Canada Homes Act
A bill to create yet another federal housing agency, because apparently CMHC, the Crown corporation that's supposed to handle this, isn't enough. The Liberals insisted this is needed because of a housing crisis, while the Conservatives pointed out the Liberals have been in power for 8 years. Much of the debate consisted of the Housing Minister praising this new agency he gets to oversee.
“We're in a crisis. Many Canadians can't find affordable housing. Canada needs more non-market housing like Europe. We need a new agency dedicated to that. It's urgent to create this new Crown corporation to take action and deliver results.”
“Building codes are a provincial responsibility. The federal government is not supposed to interfere with how provinces and cities set standards for new housing. But I have a plan to tweak those building standards anyway. We need a new layer of federal codes and certification for manufactured housing parts. It's more important to certify the parts than to let industry build homes at prices people can afford. My new codes will tell the whole country what to accept.”
“The housing crisis isn't our fault. It's everyone's fault. Every government made this problem. We all share the blame. The feds didn't build enough housing. The provinces didn't help enough. Local governments had challenges approving enough housing fast enough too. Build Canada Homes could help a little by attracting some private money. We should spend money on that.”
“I know remote places cost more. We have a deal with Quebec. And with Nunavut. It's good news. We will build hundreds of homes there. We can make the parts in factories. Ship them to remote places. It is more efficient. The program helps places that cost more.”
“I don't have much to say about the bill itself. I just want to cheer for our side and claim we work well with others. The other side isn't helping at all. They'd never pass our bill. I'm glad the housing minister is doing a good job. Please tell me more about how we work with Quebec and provinces. And say something about accountability.”
“This is all going great. Lots of places say they'll build homes using our program. We have deals with most provinces now. They say they'll build thousands of homes. Look, that's a lot of homes! We're doing a good job. I just keep saying our program is popular. I don't have to say how many homes we'll actually build or when they'll be finished. I won't mention market reforms to make housing cheaper. I just say lots of people want to use our program. That must mean it's good.”
“I don't like his email. Walk over here and lets talk. I'm willing to talk about housing. I promise I'm focused on building homes.”
“Shipping prefab homes is pricey, but it's worth it to cut construction waste. Build Canada Homes just needs to factor it into the cost. It would be even better if we could get local people to assemble these homes.”
“These Conservatives keep sending letters and emails about housing. I just want to talk about my own big announcement. Look at all the money we're spending in New Brunswick! That's the important thing.”
“I'm filling time repeating nice things about New Brunswick to make the MP look good. Notice all the spending happening there.”
“I want you to know that I like New Brunswick's building policies. I want their lower governments and programs to make more homes. I want other provinces to copy that. That will let my government take credit.”
“I want the government to control and spend on housing through a new federal Crown corporation. I want more public money and federal tools pushing this program. I promise this new federal spending will somehow make home building easier and faster for provinces, cities, and private companies.”
“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later. I want two agencies. That means more jobs for my friends. CMHC will keep subsidizing market housing and Build Canada Homes will subsidize... non-market housing. Also, we're folding Canada Lands into Build Canada Homes for, um, synergy or something.”
“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later. I hope the government spends a lot of money on housing in my riding. That would really make me look good.”
“I'm ignoring your procedural point. Many groups want money from this program. We will spend a lot of money building these homes with your tax dollars. I just want you to know that we are doing something about homelessness.”
“We need two separate agencies, not one. CMHC should focus on market housing. Build Canada Homes should focus on affordable housing. They do different things, with different partners. Quebec agrees with us.”
“The goal is to spend as much as possible and hope for the best. I don't want to set targets I might be held to.”
“I want to steer this away from our trade problems and make it about a totally different program. Maybe if I talk up spending on Canada Homes real Canadians will forget we've failed to open the U.S. market to our wood.”
“I want to cheer for a program my party is already doing and change the subject to one of our wins. My riding's provincial government got to play a big role in spending more federal money on housing, so I get to take credit. Let's talk about how great I am instead of these other problems.”