Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

Bill C-38, Canadian Fuel Affordability Act · Second reading · now law Where it stands

What the law does

The law extends the temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027. Between February 1, 2027, and March 31, 2027, excise tax rates on fuels are set at 50% of their regular rates.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

34 statements

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill quickly. It cuts federal fuel taxes until early 2027 to lower gas prices for families and businesses.”
  • A repeated line

    “We introduced the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.”

    Said 29 times by 19 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

moved that Bill C-38, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (extension of the federal fuel excise tax relief), be read the second time and referred to a committee. He said: Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to be back here this morning. It is a pleasure to see all my colleagues. I see a lot of smiles in the House on both sides of the aisle. It is great to be back and it is great to be surrounded by so many familiar faces. It is great to see some new faces on this side of the aisle, and I want to welcome them to Parliament. Yes, they have been elected and now they are representing their constituents with distinction and a lot of energy. Like all members, I spent the summer meeting with Canadians, as we should all do, in Charlottetown, Edmonton, Toronto and obviously in my own riding of Saint-Maurice—Champlain, all of whom, like us, are trying to navigate a rapidly changing world. For those Canadians, I have good news, which is why it is an honour for me to participate in today’s debate on the very important bill, Bill C-38, the Canadian fuel affordability act. The measures set out in this bill will give Canadians the support they need right now. We are faced with a world that is increasingly complex, increasingly volatile and, for many, more costly and unpredictable. The United States is imposing new tariffs on Canada. Global conflict and ongoing supply disruptions in the Middle East have been driving up fuel prices around the world, adding pressure to household budgets here and in many jurisdictions. In response, Canada’s government remains focused on what we can control: building a stronger, more independent and more affordable country. Economic uncertainty and the rising cost of living mean that affordability is a major concern for families and businesses across Canada. One of our government’s priorities is to help Canadians keep more of their hard-earned money. While we are working tirelessly to make Canada stronger in the long term, we are giving Canadians a hand today to help them bridge the gap to this better and more certain future. Our government is diversifying our trade partners abroad, attracting historic levels of foreign direct investment, and I am sure everyone took notice of the great investment summit we had; delivering responsible fiscal management as every Canadian expects from this government; and supporting Canadians while under pressure from everyday expenses. There is no doubt that Bill C-38 is a key part of this effort. Bill C-38 is just the latest initiative by our government designed to help Canadians cope with elevated fuel costs. Members will recall that in April of this year, we introduced a temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax on gasoline, aviation gasoline, diesel fuel and aviation fuel. This measure reduced federal fuel excise tax rates to zero cents per litre. The positive effects were felt right away. When the suspension took effect, gas prices dropped by 11¢ per litre on day one. Again, that was 11¢ per litre on day one. Clearly, the savings were passed on to consumers right away. The suspension was set to end earlier this month, after September 7, but before that date, our government announced that it would be extending the suspension of the federal excise tax on fuel until January 31, 2027, and then reducing the regular rates by 50% through March 31, 2027. The passage of Bill C-38 would ensure that Canadians get this much-needed relief at the pump right now. This would be immediate, targeted and felt across our nation. This measure has already brought down everyday costs for Canadians, including those in trucking, in the food industry, in agriculture, in housing, in construction and in the delivery sectors. This provides Canadians with immediate, substantial support. The additional fiscal impact of extending the federal fuel excise tax suspension is estimated at approximately $2.9 billion. All told, Canadians are expected to receive an estimated $5.3 billion in tax relief in 2026 and 2027. We know that this measure will continue to make a difference for Canadians, and we also know that extending the fuel tax suspension is one of the measures helping families, workers and businesses cope with global economic uncertainty. Let me put this measure in context and talk about fiscal responsibility and economic strength, because Canada is entering this period of a new world economic order in a position of strength. Canada’s economy has remained resilient, despite global challenges. I want to take this opportunity in my first address to Parliament in this session as we come back to thank all the workers around this country. They have proven extremely resilient. I want to thank all the business owners. I think they deserve a big round of applause, because they are the ones who make this country work every day. I want to thank the countless small and medium-sized businesses across our country, which have proven resilient. The world has seen that Canada is far more resilient than people expected. Despite the winds bringing tariffs and other uncertainty in the world, Canada has shown a degree of resiliency that is an inspiration to all of us and to the world. In fact, Canada’s economy is so resilient that our country is projected by the International Monetary Fund to have the second-fastest economic growth in the G7 this year and next. This is a testament to the resilience of our people, our workers and our businesses across the country. This performance has put us in a solid fiscal position. As highlighted in the spring economic update, we have reduced Canada’s projected deficit for 2025-26 by more than $11 billion relative to budget 2025. That fiscal firepower is allowing us to build a Canada that is both strong and fair. As government revenues have increased, we have redirected some of that growth toward measures to improve affordability and support Canadians at a time of need. These measures are having a real impact on the lives of Canadians across the country. As Canada continues to build a stronger, more resilient and more independent economy, our government is taking concrete steps to bring down costs now while investing in long-term prosperity. For example, we are going to double the capacity of Canada’s electricity grid to ensure a supply of clean, reliable, affordable energy produced right here at home. Our government has already accomplished much in helping bring down costs for Canadians. We have cut income taxes for 22 million Canadians by lowering the first marginal personal income tax rate from 15% to 14% as of July 1, 2025. In fact, it was the very first measure of this new government. This is providing tax relief of up to $420 a year per person or up to $840 a year for two-income families. We have eliminated the goods and services tax for first-time homebuyers on new homes worth up to $1 million and reduced the GST for first-time homebuyers on new homes between $1 million and $1.5 million. This relief has allowed more Canadians, particularly young families, to achieve their dream of home ownership. We eliminated the federal consumer carbon price as of April 1, 2025, directly saving Canadians money at the pump. On that same day, our government also removed the requirement for the provinces and territories to have a consumer-facing carbon price. To deliver additional support for more than 12 million Canadians, we also launched the new Canada groceries and essential benefit, a flagship measure that is immediate, targeted and meaningful for families across our country. It provides a family up to $1,890 this year and about $1,400 a year for the next four years and provides a single person up to $950 this year and about $700 a year for the next four years. This is meaningful, and it is going to help Canadians across our nation, but there is much more. We made the national school food program permanent, which is something every member of the House should be proud of. This is a game-changer for so many kids in our country and so many families. We just have to talk school teachers to know how much this is appreciated and is making a meaningful difference. It is going to provide school meals for up to 400,000 children per year. These are the kinds of things we were elected to do: to be there for children, to be there for families and to be there for Canadians. This is going to save participating families with two children in school an estimated $800 annually on groceries. This is really meaningful for many people. We also introduced automatic federal benefits, starting in the 2026 tax year, to ensure that up to five million low-income Canadians automatically receive the benefits they qualify for in the 2028 tax year. This is something that is very meaningful. It is the right thing to do to support Canadians. Canada is well positioned to respond to external pressures from the increasingly fragmented and uncertain world beyond our borders. We cannot control the global forces driving up prices, but we can control how we react to them. Our government is cutting taxes and boosting affordability to help Canadians manage everyday expenses, while building a more robust, more independent economy. Canadians see it, and they are behind this project to make Canada strong. It is not a coincidence that our government made this bill one of our first priorities of the new fall session. Canadians are expecting swift and concrete action from all of us, and when I say all of us, it is not not just those members sitting on this side of the aisle, but I am looking at my colleagues who are here this morning. They expect all of us to address the cost of living challenges, and today we are offering an opportunity for every member of the House not only to speak but also to take a step to support Canadian families. Canadians across the nation will be watching what people will do today, because it is sending a message that we stand with them. We are there for them, and that is the kind of message Canadians expect from the House. We are delivering for Canadians and expect all members of the House to do the same. The passage of this legislation would advance our government’s important work to bring down costs for Canadians today while building a stronger economy for generations to come. I urge all hon. members to pass Bill C-38 without delay. Let us seize the moment. Let us be ambitious. Let us be there for Canadians together.

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I want all members to vote for this bill. It will quickly lower the cost of gas and food across the country.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 36 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I have a lot of respect for my colleague. He is an esteemed and very experienced member of the House. I am trying to understand what he is saying to Canadians at home. I think what he is saying is that he is going to vote for the bill. I think that is good news, because it is something we should all support because it is meaningful, it is targeted and it is immediate. It is going to have an impact across our nation. It is going to reduce the pressure on the price of gas and the price of food. I take it that my hon. colleague will convince all his colleagues, because I know he is a man who has a lot of influence in his caucus. He will convince all those members to stand in unity with the government and do what is right for Canadians.

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I thank the member for supporting this bill. On her concern about business investment, Canadian pension funds are putting large amounts of money back into our economy. I am happy to keep working with her.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 21 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, first of all, I want to thank my hon. colleague for her support. She has always been there to rise to the moment and support the government in a meaningful way. I want to thank her, not only on behalf of the government but also on behalf of Canadians, for the work she does and the position she has been taking in the House. I have had the privilege for almost 12 years now to see her in action, and she has always been there to support the government in a meaningful way. My hon. colleague’s point about the investment summit should reassure her. She will have seen that our pension funds in Canada have been recommitting very large investments into the Canadian economy. This is very much welcome. I am always glad to work with her.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I support this bill. Our government already cut the carbon tax and gave millions of Canadians a tax break. Now this bill cuts the gas tax to help people with high costs.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I reflect on my constituents and what they want. We have a Prime Minister who has been leading a government that talks a great deal about building a stronger, healthier Canada, but that does not leave out the important issue of affordability. I think about one of the very first actions the new government took, which was to get rid of the carbon tax and then to provide a tax break to over 20 million Canadians. Today, the Minister of Finance has provided a true reflection of what every Liberal member of Parliament has been asking for: to provide additional tax relief in the form of the gas tax to address the issue of affordability, something I know he and my colleagues are very passionate about.

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“Canadians are worried about the cost of food, rent, and gas. This bill cuts fuel taxes to help them. It is part of our work to lower costs, along with cutting income taxes and giving tax relief on groceries and new homes.”
  • A repeated line

    “We are going to build Canada strong.”

    Said 33 times by 14 members since April 24.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I just want to compliment my colleague. He is a true voice for our government in the House. He is right. This is one of the measures. We understand that affordability is front and centre, and we have been acting on all fronts. Canadians are concerned about the end of the week and the end of the month, with the price of food, the price of rent and the price of gas. He is right that we have a suite of measures to help Canadians. We introduced the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. We cut income taxes for 22 million Canadians. We cancelled the consumer carbon tax, and we provided GST relief for first-time homebuyers. At every step of the way, we have been there to support Canadians. The message is very loud and clear that we are going to be there for them. We are going to build Canada strong. We are going to do that together. We should all be proud of what we can achieve in this country. We support each other. We build for the future. We are going to make Canada strong.

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I welcome the member's question. Canada is at the centre of global energy development. We will develop our resources responsibly, working with British Columbia and Indigenous nations.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this statement addressed the specific topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 46 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, that is a very important question that my hon. colleague posed, and I thank him for raising the issue. It is great to hear an MP from British Columbia supporting the ambitious agenda we have set for ourselves. I will state the words of the executive director of the International Energy Agency, who recently said that the world energy architecture is being redesigned, and Canada is going to be at the centre. This is a project for all Canadians. With great attention to the comment he made, we want to make sure that we develop our resources in a sustainable and responsible way. The member can trust the government to always do that with all the partners, the Province of British Columbia and indigenous nations. We are going to do what is right for this country, and I welcome his question.

François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue

Liberal
“I want the NDP to help us pass this bill quickly in committee. It will help families, truckers, and farmers afford fuel.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, first of all, the support from the New Democrats is welcome. I think they understand that the measure is a much-needed support for Canadians. This is about Canadians. This is about families, truckers and farmers. This is about the people who provide the logistics and feed this country. This is a measure that is very much needed. It is going to be impactful. I welcome the support, and I am sure the member is going to help us at committee to do that as quickly as possible to show that the NDP can stand up for Canadians.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“This bill helps Canadians with the cost of living, and I am glad the Conservatives will vote for it. Our school food program also helps 400,000 children. Should the Conservatives change their minds and support that program too?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, Bill C-38 is all about giving a break on the issue of affordability to Canadians. This is something the government has recognized as very important. One of the aspects the government brought forward last year to help children was the national food program within our schools, helping 400,000 young people. I am glad the Conservative Party today is going to be supporting Bill C-38. I am wondering if the member could provide her thoughts on whether she believes the Conservative Party should reverse its position and support Canada’s national food program, which supports 400,000 children from coast to coast to coast.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I am glad the Conservatives are supporting this bill to lower fuel taxes. I hope we can work together on other bills too. Will the Conservatives rethink their opposition to the school food program that feeds 400,000 children?”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 24 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, as I indicated earlier, I am glad to see that the Conservative Party is recognizing the value of supporting this particular piece of legislation. Hopefully, through collaboration, we will see this type of support for other types of legislation as we try to build that stronger and healthier Canada. My question to my friend across the way is one that I posed earlier to one of his colleagues: Is the Conservative Party prepared to revisit its position in regard to the school nutrition program, which supports and feeds 400,000 children in Canada?

Greg Fergus, Hull—Aylmer

Liberal
“I want the member to answer two questions clearly. Will his party support pausing the federal tax on gas? And how does he plan to vote on this bill?”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 42 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I listened to my colleague with great interest, and I congratulate him. I would like to warmly welcome my hon. colleague back to the House. He talked about what is worth discussing. I have two very clear questions to ask him, and I hope he can answer them very clearly and unequivocally. First, I believe that the Parti Québécois supports or is calling for the suspension of the excise tax on gasoline. Will the Bloc Québécois support the Parti Québécois on this issue? I also have a second very quick question. He spoke at great length and in great detail, but I would just like to know how he is going to vote.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“All parties are working together to pass this bill to lower gas taxes. It will help Canadians across the country. Provinces should also cut their gas taxes to help people.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is encouraging to see that we are getting wide-spectrum support, working in collaboration with the Conservatives, the Bloc and the New Democrats. It would appear as if the legislation will, in fact, be passing. The biggest benefactors will be Canadians from coast to coast to coast. They will benefit because of collaboration within the House on a good initiative. Would the member opposite not agree that one thing we could do would be to look to our provincial counterparts and suggest that they too provide some excise tax relief on gas?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I want the House and the Senate to pass this bill quickly. It keeps the 10-cent gas tax cut until the end of January, and keeps a 5-cent cut until the end of March. This is part of our work to lower costs for Canadians, alongside our programs for dental care, school food, and middle-class tax cuts. I want the Conservatives to support those programs too.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise and address a very important aspect of the government’s agenda. What we have seen over the last year and a half is a Prime Minister and a government that have been focused on how we are going to build a stronger and healthier economy, an economy that works for all Canadians. I am going to go into some detail with respect to that, but it is really important that we recognize that as much as that is a priority, whether for the Prime Minister or any member of the Liberal caucus, the issue of affordability is right in our faces and needs to be addressed. We continue to work on that particular file. The Conservatives will talk about plagiarism. When Canadians elected this Prime Minister just over a year ago, along with 70-plus new Liberal members of Parliament, we saw a commitment to affordability on a multitude of different fronts. In fact, the very first action the Prime Minister took was to get rid of the carbon tax on fuel. That put money directly into the pockets of Canadians in a very real and tangible way. That was not an initiative driven by the Conservative Party. That was an initiative driven by Canadians, because prior to making that commitment, our Prime Minister was talking with thousands of Canadians. That is what drove that policy. Not all political parties in the chamber supported it at the time, but as a government, we got behind our Prime Minister in recognizing the priority of affordability. It did not stop there. We can look at one of the first pieces of legislation introduced under Canada’s new Prime Minister a matter of weeks after the election. It was a middle class-plus tax break, and 22 million Canadians benefited by that break. That is a significant way to deal with the issue of affordability. Again, money was put back into the pockets of Canadians because we recognize the impact of affordability. Then if we advance a little further in the term, all within the last year, we see one of my favourite programs, the groceries and essentials benefit program, which is a conversion of the GST rebate. Substantial dollars were added, again targeted to helping millions of Canadians in dealing with groceries and essentials. That is a payment Canadians are receiving on a regular basis. Those are the types of initiatives the Prime Minister and this government have taken, all in the last year. It does not end there. If we take a look at the spring economic plan or the budget, however we might want to frame it, one of the highlights in there was to give an gas excise tax break to Canadians in support of the issue of affordability. It was a substantial commitment by the government, a break of 10¢ a litre for those who are driving, whether they are a business or an individual driving a child to school, whatever it might be. It is a significant amount of money. That was a suspension that took us to Labour Day, but as Canadians are aware, we have the United States to the south of us, and there was an issuance of new tariffs. That does not help our economy. The concern from the government caucus and the Prime Minister was how we can provide support. One of the things we looked at was extending the break on the tax on gas through Bill C-38, the legislation we have before us, which was just introduced. Background work was done in order to recognize that there would be great benefit to seeing this legislation pass. This is why, in one of the questions, I commented in regard to the issue of collaboration. This legislation, Bill C-38, is going to pass today not only as a direct result of the Prime Minister’s desire to see it put into place, which is important, but because we have collaboration on the floor of the House of Commons. I am grateful to and thank all members of the House for recognizing how important Bill C-38 is on the issue of affordability, because by us passing it, what we are really doing is saying to our constituents that they are going to continue to get that 10¢ a litre gas break until the end of January. What we also know because of this legislation is that the gas break is going to continue at half the amount, in other words five cents a litre, all the way to the end of March. To me, what we are seeing is a House of Commons that has been inspired, at least in part, by a policy initiative that the Prime Minister has been talking about since becoming the Prime Minister of Canada on an issue that is so important to all Canadians: the issue of affordability. Because of that, we are going to get it passed. It will pass tonight at second reading, and it is nice to see that the legislation has been programmed. I would appeal to the Senate, because the bill will go to the Senate, and ask that the Senate take a look at how the House of Commons is dealing with the legislation so we can hopefully see its quick passage and it can ultimately receive royal assent. Those are direct ways in which the government has been supporting Canadians on the issue of affordability. There are many different other examples over the last year of actions that the government has taken in order to support Canadians, and I would like to give a couple of examples of that. I could talk about the expansion of the child benefit program, which helps our families in a time of need. The one I like to talk about is the dental program. The dental program helps millions of Canadians. I am thinking in particular of seniors who are on fixed incomes. There are others, but I would focus my attention on the seniors all of us represent. Every one of us as parliamentarians has constituents who have benefited directly from that program. That is a program for which I am still waiting to see unanimous support from the House of Commons. I would like, for example, to see the Conservatives change their position on the dental program. It would send a very clear message, not about collaboration but about the idea of it as a public policy. A national dental care program would be there into the future. Another program that we provide a great deal of support towards is the national school food program, which feeds 400,000 children across Canada in a very real and tangible way. Again, I would look to my Conservative colleagues across the way, who have opposed that particular program. Unfortunately, we have had members say, “Well, it does not exist.” We have had members across the way say that it is a garbage program. It is a tangible program. It is feeding children in need, and it helps in terms of their education. Back in the day when I was inside the Manitoba legislature in 1988, there were individuals like Sharon Carstairs, the leader of the Liberal Party, who said that we cannot educate a child on an empty stomach. This has been a generational problem. Children were unable to be fed in schools, and that was causing a problem. It was not for all children, but there was definitely a large percentage of children who needed this back in the 1980s. We have a Prime Minister who, a few months after being elected, came out saying that not only does he support the program, but we are going to make it a permanent program, while some in the chamber call it a garbage program. At the end of the day, this is a program that I hope the Conservative Party will recognize and see the value of. Again, if not directly then indirectly it helps with regard to the issue of affordability. I can talk about the reinforcement of and support for the pharmacare program, which is relatively new. We have the federal government supporting certain aspects. Hopefully, into the future it will grow, but at the very least we must try to do our best to maintain it. I would love to see it take on the issue of shingles in Canada, for example. At the very least, there is a pharmacare program helping tens of thousands of Canadians deal with issues like dialysis. If the program is not there, the disposable income for individuals receiving dialysis is that much smaller. Those are only some of the programs that are meant, through this government and the leadership of the Prime Minister, to support Canadians with respect to the issue of affordability, but there are a lot more. I suspect that because we will probably end up sitting until midnight, throughout this debate we will hear about more of those different types of programs. I know that my time to speak is limited, but I want to highlight that what helps Canadians is a stronger and healthier economy. Again, I am going to go back to the last election and what the government, through the leadership of our Prime Minister, has been able to accomplish on the world scene, because appealing to the world is making a difference. We need to recognize that the U.S. tariffs are designed, in part, to hurt and divide Canadians. We need to look at ways we can conduct trade and commerce that go beyond the United States. We need to focus attention on Canadian sovereignty. Once again, members will find that we are aggressively pursuing that agenda. I would argue that we have the right person sitting in the prime minister’s chair at the right time in Canadian history. I believe that is going to show years from now. With the connections and the ability to communicate along with the relationships that have been established by, in particular, our Prime Minister, but by others too, doors around the world have opened. We have been talking a great deal about the investment summit that took place in Toronto. In the lead-up to that investment summit, a sense of excitement was building. I talked about this last year, and I would argue that the Prime Minister is a fantastic ambassador for trade, opportunities and investment to be brought into Canada, which is why it is important that we have the Prime Minister or the Minister of Agriculture, the Minister of Trade, the Minister of International Trade or the Minister of Foreign Affairs out and about, talking about how Canada has what the world needs. By doing that, we are building that stronger economy. If members want to get a good sense of just how effective it has been, they can take a look at what happened in Toronto earlier this month. Never before in the history of Canada has there been a half a trillion dollars of investment-type commitments. We are talking about billions in different projects. We had investment bankers, companies, pension funds, all involved and engaged. Toronto welcomed the world as our Prime Minister and government hosted what I would classify as one of the most successful economic summits that Canada has ever witnessed. As a direct result, there is close to half a trillion dollars of commitments. Every region of our country will benefit by that. A stronger and healthier Canadian economy through these investments and expanded trade opportunities is going to help on the issue of affordability as it will generate the types of middle-class jobs that Canadians want to see. Yes, there are going to be some difficult times. Some months will be difficult because we will see a drop in employment. However, even at a time when we have pressures coming from the United States, the tariff issue and the trade uncertainty, through the actions, in good part, that this government has taken in working collaboratively with many different stakeholders, including provinces, we have been able to accomplish a net gain of tens of thousands of jobs since this Prime Minister has taken office. I believe it is a net gain of over 150,000 jobs. We cannot control Donald Trump, nor would I want to per se. Having said that, there are things we can do, and we are doing them.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The member called our school food program garbage, and he opposes our dental care program too. Thousands of children and seniors in his own riding use these programs. He should talk to them and rethink his position. Conservatives need to work with us to make life more affordable for Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I did not name the member opposite, but I will now, as the member who actually said the national school food program is garbage and he does not believe in it. He called it garbage. Am I surprised that he does not like the dental program that serves millions of Canadians? The answer is no. He does not surprise me. What I would suggest to the member is that he talk to the thousands of children and seniors combined in his constituency who have benefited directly from the dental program and the school program, and maybe revisit his position, because his position seems to carry a great deal of weight within the Conservative Party. It is time that the Conservative Party, if it wants to deal with the issue of affordability, joins us and works collaboratively on this issue because it is important. It supports Canadians.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“All parties worked together on this bill, so the House will pass it quickly. I hope the Senate does the same. It helps Canadians afford gas by cutting the federal fuel tax until early 2027.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 43 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I thank the member for that question because she is quite right. There has been a great deal of collaboration with respect to this particular bill. That is one of the reasons it will ultimately pass through the House in a very timely fashion. As I indicated earlier, hopefully we will get a sense from the Senate that it will pass in an equally timely fashion because of the will of the House of Commons. It is also important to recognize that the government, in particular with the Prime Minister’s leadership, has recognized the issue of affordability and how important it is to Canadians. We will continue to follow that file very closely. It is important to note that this legislation will extend the temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027, at the full 10¢ a litre and then reduce it. I am talking about the consumer gas that most of our constituents use. Then it will be extended for another couple of months at 50%, or five cents a litre.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The government helps seniors in many ways, not just with fuel costs. We help pay for dental care, dialysis, and higher pensions for people over 75. Lower fuel taxes also help everyone, including seniors who drive or take the bus.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I think it is important to recognize that there is not just one area in which the government is giving support to Canadians but a multitude of different areas. For example, when we think of seniors, we can think of the benefits. I highlighted, for example, the dental program. I can highlight dialysis. Many seniors receive dialysis. We can talk about the seniors over age 75 who received a substantial increase over and above what would have been the guaranteed annual increase. Many seniors continue to drive. A senior over the age of 90 can still be driving, and they too will get breaks. There are individuals using buses. Everyone benefits from that 10¢-a-litre drop, which has an impact on fares. Directly and indirectly, there are tangible supports for seniors in many different ways.

Peter Fonseca, Mississauga East—Cooksville

Liberal
“Lowering the tax on gas helps people in my riding afford to drive to work and take their kids to sports. Can the member say more about how this helps people save money?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, just listening to the member, I think vividly of my riding. As people go to the gas pump, for the average resident and consumer in Mississauga East—Cooksville, that means a reduction in the price of gas they are paying. They need gas to get to work. They need it to take their kids to sports. They need it for everything they do. It is so important to have these affordability measures. The member has mentioned many other measures. He has talked about the school nutrition program, about how we are also helping with senior supports and about the dental program. When it comes to gas, this is something that affects everybody every single day. Can the member elaborate on that?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. It lowers fuel taxes by 10 cents a litre until January 2027, and by five cents a litre through March 2027. This helps Canadians save money.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the member has hit it right on. We are talking about a 10¢-a-litre break. That is a significant amount of money. Many of his constituents are going to have a direct benefit from it. We would, through this legislation, take that break all the way to the end of January, and then from February to the end of March, there would be a five-cent-a-litre break. I look at the legislation as a very important legislative measure on the issue of affordability, but there are many others that I talked about during my comments, some of which the member made reference to. This is all an attempt to say that the government caucus and the Prime Minister want Canadians to know that we are very sensitive to the issue, we are proactively working on the affordability issue by taking many budgetary matters seriously, and we are acting.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The school food program is not just needed because of high costs today. Children have gone to school hungry for decades. That is why we made the program permanent.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear about the national food program, which the member was critical of by saying Canadians used to be able to afford to feed their children. It is a bit misleading, and let me explain why. Back in 1988, I was first elected to the Manitoba legislature. The leader of the Liberal Party at that time was a wonderful lady by the name of Sharon Carstairs. Sharon Carstairs often talked about children who were going to school in Manitoba on empty stomachs and said that we needed to ensure they were being fed in schools. It gives a false impression to say that this program is something that is only necessary today because of the issue of affordability. This is not necessarily true. It has been necessary for a long time. The Prime Minister has recognized that, and that is why we made the program permanent.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I am glad the Conservatives support this fuel tax bill to help Canadians with costs. It is just one of many ways our government is helping people. The member complained about a senior who could not get government dental care. I want to know if he supports free dental care for everyone.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, first of all, as I expressed at the beginning of the discussions and debates, there are a number of ideas out there. We are very happy and grateful that the Conservatives are supporting Bill C-38. It will make a difference for Canadians. However, to address the member’s comments, I will say that this is only one initiative that the government has brought in to support Canadians on the issue of affordability. I want to follow up with a very specific question. The member made reference to a senior who did not qualify for the dental program, and that was part of the problem. Does the member support universal free access to dental care? Is that what he is advocating, because that is not—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. Our government cares about making life more affordable. We already cut 17 cents a litre off gas permanently, and this bill keeps another 10-cent cut in place.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I have indicated, affordability is something the Prime Minister and this government have taken very seriously from day one. I understand that the Conservatives want to focus on one aspect that deals with affordability. I will talk about the price of gas at the pump. Prior to the Prime Minister taking office, we were paying a 17¢-a-litre carbon tax. The Prime Minister got rid of that 17¢ a litre and made it permanent. Then we put in a temporary suspension of 10¢ a litre, and that is what Bill C-38 would do. The Prime Minister understands affordability, and we are moving in the right direction with a holistic approach.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 141

  1. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 92 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  3. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 10 statements
  4. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Forestry Industry 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  17. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
  20. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 65 statements
  22. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business Jury Duty Appreciation Week Act 6 statements
  24. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 182 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements