The Budget

The House debated the government’s 2026 budget. Liberal members said the budget invests in the economy while meeting its fiscal targets, pointing to lower taxes for businesses that invest, a separation of operating and capital spending, funding for clean electricity, heat pump rebates, electric vehicle chargers and marine conservation, and a deficit lower than forecast. Conservatives said the budget adds too much debt, lacks a credible plan to balance the books, raises interest costs, and leaves the country less prepared for future crises, and urged members to vote against it. Bloc Québécois members objected that the budget supports fossil fuels and questioned whether natural resources would be processed in Canada, while the NDP criticized what it called unfair ferry funding for British Columbia compared with Atlantic Canada.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

27 statements

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“I support this budget. Canada's economy is strong, with the fastest growth in the G7 last quarter and big investments coming in. This budget lowers taxes for businesses that invest and hire, cuts government operating costs, and gives people money to help pay for groceries and daily costs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Honoré-Mercier. As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, it gives me great honour to rise today to speak to budget 2026. Yesterday, the Minister of Finance rose in the chamber to deliver budget 2026, an ambitious yet common-sense plan that would build on the generational investments made in budget 2025 to grow our economy, protect our communities and build a more unified Canada. As Canada grapples with this unique moment in history, it is important to remember that Canada has what the world wants and the foundations to build more ourselves here at home: abundant energy, critical minerals, advanced manufacturing, leadership in AI and extraordinary talent all across this country. Unlike those who talk the economy down, talk down our workers or claim that Canada is broken, budget 2026 will harness our strengths here at home and help Canadian businesses invest, improve productivity, scale up at home, compete on the world stage and create good-paying jobs. This budget will show that Canada is moving, and moving fast, to build a strong, more resilient and more united country, and while that long-term vision takes root, we will provide Canadians with a bridge and a boost in the interim to help make life more affordable. We have more than can ever be taken away from us, and budget 2026 is our plan to be the masters of our own destiny. Budget 2026 highlights Canada’s resilience amid global uncertainty. It also makes clear that Canada is meeting those challenges from a position of strength. The global economic order is experiencing its most consequential transformation in close to a century. The conflict in the Middle East has driven up energy prices. That is incontestable. Protectionism is rising around the world. Supply chains are being reorganized around security and sovereignty, and capital is seeking countries that can offer stability, energy and resources, talent, and trusted access to global markets. We have the opportunity, and in fact the duty, to meet this moment by helping to build a stronger, more independent Canadian economy. Budget 2026 is key to that approach, and it meets the moment. While others offer slogans or partisan rhetoric, we have the right plan and we know it is working. There are many signs of progress. They are multiple and are outlined in budget 2026 in the fiscal outlook. The world has changed dramatically. The relationships that powered Canada’s prosperity for decades can no longer be taken as a given. Since we were elected, our response has been very clear: We will focus on what we can control, and we will do so from a position of strength and resilience. We are strengthening our foundations here at home, diversifying our partnerships abroad and making life more affordable for Canadians. Our competitive advantages are among the strongest in the world, ranging from a skilled workforce, clean and traditional energy, and an abundance of critical minerals and natural resources, to our strong public finances and access to global markets. We have what the world wants, and we have what it takes to chart our own course. Canada and Canadians are ready to embrace this opportunity. We will not listen to those who say it is not possible and that we should settle for less. The numbers show that Canada is facing these challenges from a position of strength. Canada is not immune to geopolitical realignments, but we are moving decisively to seize the opportunities that they create. The Canadian economy grew by 3.3% annualized in the second quarter of this year, the fastest growth in the G7, driven by higher exports, household spending and new business investment. Recent data suggests that the economy remains resilient in the third quarter as well. According to the International Monetary Fund, Canada is projected to grow at the second-fastest pace in the G7 in 2027. Fiscal discipline is the bedrock of our approach. By spending less on day-to-day operations and managing public finances responsibly, we can invest more in Canadian workers, businesses and industries while making generational investments in infrastructure, defence, housing and innovation, and increasing our productive capacity, which is needed to expand our economy. By reducing operating costs, we are also able to invest in Canada’s long-term growth while making life more affordable for Canadians. Over the past year, our government has put in place a series of ambitious strategies spanning electricity, defence, critical minerals, food security, artificial intelligence and nature. Together, they are helping Canada seize major opportunities while strengthening our resilience in a more uncertain world. The early results are clear. Investment is growing. Major projects are advancing. New trade and investment agreements are opening markets abroad. More Canadians are finding rewarding, well-paying careers in the industries that will drive growth in the decades ahead. Our government’s strategy has helped position Canada to enter a new era of investment. Budget 2026 advances flagship tax policy changes, including the productivity mega deduction and the Canada growth incentive, which will further strengthen our tax competitiveness and create the conditions to catalyze an investment supercycle. Through strategic, targeted investments and broad-based tax policy changes, Canada remains among the leading advanced economies for tax competitiveness. Public investment, private capital, major projects and new market opportunities are coming together to expand what Canada can build and produce for decades to come. This is at the heart of Canada’s investment supercycle: a continuously evolving cycle in which each investment strengthens the conditions for the next. Foreign direct investment in Canada is at its highest level in nearly two decades. Canada attracted $98 billion in foreign investment in 2025 and has led the G7 in direct investment inflows per capita since early 2025. In September, Canada hosted its first-ever investment summit, bringing together approximately 200 of the world’s leading investors. It helped secure nearly $500 billion in new investment commitments and financing for businesses in Canada. Our government’s focus now is to turn those investment commitments into projects, jobs and growth. That means more homes, modernized infrastructure, twice the electricity capacity, new critical mineral projects, defence investments that build new industries, and deeper connections to global markets. It also means helping businesses of all sizes invest in technology, innovation, robotics and AI to boost productivity and better compete globally. Small and medium-sized businesses are the backbone of Canada’s economy, making up over 98% of Canadian businesses and creating jobs in communities across this country. To help businesses invest, grow and succeed in Canada, budget 2026 introduced several measures. They include the Canada growth incentive to help high-potential Canadian businesses attract investment and grow here at home. They also include a new tax exemption on up to $15 million in capital gains earned from successful investments in eligible Canadian companies for founders, key employees and investors, and an enhanced small business rollover to allow more investments to qualify for tax deferrals on capital gains when proceeds are reinvested in another Canadian small business. Budget 2026 also announced a commercialization expansion of the scientific research and experimental development tax incentive program. It is worth $930 million of investment over five years to help turn more Canadian ideas into growing companies, high-paying careers and made-in-Canada innovation. I would not do the budget justice if I did not also point to the fact that building a stronger economy means supporting Canadians with affordability. We have boosted the Canada groceries and essentials benefit and made changes to refocus the Canada workers benefit, and we are doing a lot more. We have also made the Canada caregiver credit refundable. All of these things are going to support millions of Canadians with some of the affordability challenges that we know they are feeling on a day-to-day and monthly basis. In short, budget 2026 puts Canada in the driver’s seat to determine our own future. That is exactly what Canadians hired us to do, and that is exactly what we are going to remain focused on.

Greg McLean, Calgary Centre

Conservative
“The government is using slogans while spending away our future. This budget adds 766 billion dollars of debt over the next five years. That debt will have to be paid back. I want the member to explain how this counts as careful spending.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is on the finance committee with me, and we manage to work pretty well together as far as what we have to get done at that committee goes. I heard his speech today, and I know it is a canned speech, as it always is from that side of the House, with a whole bunch of slogans. The government has been very good at coming out with marketing slogans, and I love the name of this one, “Masters of our destiny”. Masters of our own destiny includes Canadians, Canadian taxpayers and Canadian businesses, and, frankly, the government is spending their future. There is a huge accumulation of debt in this budget classified in different ways, but we are talking about an additional $766 billion of borrowing over the next five years. It as a ludicrous amount. “Debt” is defined in public finance as demand brought forward. What is the government going to do when it has to pay that debt? Will the member please come to the table and tell me what he means by “fiscal prudence”, because we are exactly not there, and how he is going to reiterate that line when he has to—

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our budget manages our money well while bringing more investment to Canada. We are meeting our fiscal targets, and we will hit one a year early. Canada has a top credit rating, the lowest debt costs in the G7, and the smallest rise in bond yields among those countries.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am not sure what the member has against an investment supercycle and the government stepping up to attract investment in Canada and to incentivize that investment. We are sticking to both fiscal anchors in this budget. We are getting to one of our fiscal anchors a whole year ahead of schedule. I know the member opposite is worried about debt and debt charges. Canada has a AAA credit rating and the lowest debt service cost of the G7 countries as a result of our strong fiscal fundamentals. We also know that long-term bond yields in Canada have been largely isolated from the increases we have seen across the G7. Canada has the lowest rate of increase in bond yields of any G7 country.

Yves Perron, Berthier—Maskinongé

Bloc Québécois
“The budget gives foreign companies a big discount to take our natural resources and process them in other countries. I want the government to explain how it will protect our resources and make sure they are processed here.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, people seem to have a lot to say this morning, but you will not have to interrupt me. In his introduction, the member said that Canada has what the world wants. That is what worries me the most, because what they are trying to do with the 6% under the superdeduction is offer a massive discount to foreign investors who want to come here to extract our natural resources and very likely, or rather certainly, process them elsewhere. That is what we call selling our natural resources at a discount. I would like the member to explain to me how the government plans to implement measures to protect this and ensure that processing takes place here. We are all in favour of economic development, but there are limits.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“We are speeding up permits for major mineral projects without lowering our standards. We also improved tax deductions for exploration to encourage more mining, because the world needs our resources. Our new business tax deduction helps companies of all sizes invest in new equipment and become more productive.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canada has always been a jurisdiction of high standards, and we are not going to lower those standards today. We are streamlining permitting processes to get shovels in the ground on major critical mineral projects. We have enhanced the tax deductions for exploration in this country for minerals and critical minerals and extended those benefits to incentivize more critical mineral development across Canada, because we have such a wealth of natural resource assets that the world wants and needs. The member opposite talked about the productivity mega deduction. It cuts across the entire economy, applies to businesses of all sizes and allows them to have the confidence to invest in themselves and in new machinery and equipment and enhance their productivity after getting the tax deduction this year. That is only going to be a good thing for investment in this country.

Danielle Martin, University—Rosedale

Liberal
“It makes sense to borrow money if we spend it on building things for the country's future. Can the member explain the plan to separate everyday spending from building costs and balance the everyday budget?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think Canadians understand that at a time like this when we have to face going into deficit, we should be doing it to invest in infrastructure that will build the country for the future. I am wondering if the member could talk a bit about the concept of separating our operating and capital expenditures and moving to try to balance the operating budget as a government over the coming years.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our budget plan is working. It helps grow the economy and brings in private investment. Because of this growth, our deficit this year is $27.5 billion lower than we predicted in the spring. Business investments are up by 9 percent, and my colleagues should see this as good news.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is a great question. What we have done very transparently is define a capital budgeting framework with a set of definitions that corresponds to best practices around the world. We have set ourselves up to invest in the economy, draw in and attract private capital and ensure that the economy can grow. That is exactly what we have seen. My colleagues should remember that there is $27.5 billion less of a deficit in this budget, in this fiscal year, than was projected in the spring economic update. That is good news for this country. That is a result of growth in the economy and of new capital investment. We are seeing it rise at 9%. That is significant, and all colleagues should be able to recognize that.

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this budget. It invests 50 billion dollars to expand clean electricity, connect power lines across provinces, and create jobs. It also pays for heat pump rebates, thousands of new electric car chargers, and ocean conservation.”
  • A repeated line

    “This is about building Canada strong.”

    Said 5 times by 5 members since September 21.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to highlight to the member for Calgary Centre that I will be reading my original speech today. I would also like to wish the Speaker a happy Friday. I can see that everybody appears to be in a great and jovial mood today. I suspect they are all feeling very cheerful having read yesterday’s budget. Yesterday, our government released our budget, masters in our own House or, as we say in French, Maîtres chez nous. I would like to take the next 10 minutes to talk about an important budget. As members know, the expression maîtres chez nous is a slogan that was used during the Quiet Revolution in Quebec. It was an expression that was used during the campaign to nationalize electricity in the 1960s, before my time. It represents our natural resources, or protecting our lakes and rivers, but it also represents protecting our culture, our identity and our pride in being Canadian. Budget 2026 is about action, so let me outline why this budget advances many of these priorities. Yes, the front cover of the budget includes transmission lines from Churchill Falls in Newfoundland and Labrador, and that is because electricity is at the heart of this budget. Let me go through some of those measures that would advance Canada’s electricity strategy. Budget 2026 invests $50 billion in Canada’s electricity strategy, but $50 billion is more than money, though. It is about real results. New Economy Canada mentioned last night that “Budget 2026 puts electrification at the heart of Canada’s economy, ensuring energy security and affordability for businesses and households.” What would $50 billion get us? It would get us four things. First, our government’s electricity strategy is about building infrastructure, because we must build really fast. Last year, I had the honour of reading Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson’s book, Abundance, which I highly recommend. This book is important because it calls for a shift toward supply-side progressivism, where the state must actively build and reform zoning and permitting laws, but invest in large-scale physical infrastructure to electrify the economy. This $50-billion investment would do that. It would electrify the economy. When I worked in climate philanthropy, we worked with technical modelling and with partners like the Canadian Climate Institute, l’Institut de l’énergie Trottier, the David Suzuki Foundation, The Pembina Institute or The Transition Accelerator, and all modelling demonstrated that for Canada to get to net zero, we would need to at least double our electricity grid. Yesterday’s budget puts money where our mouth is. This investment in Canada’s electricity strategy is about connecting grids. In a turbulent world, we need to better integrate our provinces and territories, and this includes our complex regional electricity grids. There are 31 transmission lines that cross Canada to the U.S. border, north to south. However, to protect our sovereignty and strengthen our federation, we are now investing in integrating our grid from east to west to north. We are doing this to unify our country and to grow our economy while reducing emissions. My third point is that our $50-billion electricity strategy is about making technological components to power our grid and build our capacity and value chains. This is a unique opportunity to advance clean-tech value chains where Canada holds a strong competitive advantage. This is an opportunity for us to advance batteries and electrochemical storage, advance electricity grid equipment and infrastructure, utilize our Canadian-made critical minerals and advance our nuclear energy with CANDU technology, but also with small modular reactors. It is also an opportunity to advance hydro, solar and wind renewable energy. My fourth point is that our investment in electricity is about jobs and it is about labour. We need the skills and labour to help build out the grid and ensure support for great Canadian jobs across our country. I would also like to highlight some other measures from budget 2026 that would advance Canada’s electricity strategy. One, clean electricity investment tax credits phase-out to 15% would now occur in 2040 instead of 2034. This is positive news for the clean-tech sector. Two, this budget encourages more investment in electricity transmission and does so by extending the clean electricity ITCs for provincial electricity transmission lines in each province, with $2.4 billion allocated in 2027 to 2031 and $36 billion allocated by 2042. This is about building Canada strong. Third, it promises that $4 billion over 10 years would be provided to support electricity infrastructure expansion, renewable energy and new funding for the smart renewables and electrification pathways program. Fourth, the budget would support robust cost-benefit analysis to better understand interties and inform cross-border cost allocation discussions. Building out transmission lines and interties is not always a technical problem. It is often one of governance, of navigating complex provincial jurisdictions and challenges with social acceptability. According to Electricity Canada’s statement last night on budget 2026, modernizing our grid is a “nation-building endeavour.” This is about building real projects. For example, our budget would now allow the building of a 15-megawatt hydro facility in the Yukon, as well as an eight-megawatt hydro facility in Atlin. This is in addition to the massive 14,000 megawatts at Churchill Falls. We will be building more clean renewable projects for decades to come. I spoke about grids and electricity, but let us talk about buildings and how budget 2026 benefits the decarbonization of our buildings. As Clean Energy Canada announced last night, “Budget 2026 offers a new framework for climate progress: build, switch, transform, and innovate.” Last month, our government announced a transformative $2-billion investment in a national heat pump rebate program, which will benefit one million Canadian homes and reduce 25 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, while significantly reducing energy costs and creating jobs throughout the country. Whether Canadians are wearing a better parka to keep ourselves warm in the winter or installing a heat pump to reduce our energy bills, Canadians understand that staying warm should not mean wasting energy. Canadians also keep more money in their pocket. I am thrilled that budget 2026 renews the green industrial facilities and manufacturing program, which, to my knowledge, is now called SHIFT, the strategic high-efficiency industrial facilities transition program. This $400-million investment will help optimize energy efficiency for Canadian industrial and manufacturing facilities in a way that will help us remain competitive while also lowering carbon emissions. As a strong advocate of energy efficiency measures, I am also deeply excited for the renewal of DRE, or the deep retrofit accelerator initiative. Let us discuss transportation as well. We know that nearly one-fifth of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions come from the vehicles on our roads. Do members know that nearly 25% of global car sales this year will be electric vehicles? That is right. Everyone looks really impressed. Globally, one in four vehicles sold will be electric, and by 2030, 40% of new car sales will be EVs. The opposition is very excited about this change. Canada is huge, and we need infrastructure to change our cars. We need larger charging networks to connect Canadians, including rural communities. This is why I am electrified that budget 2026 supports the installation of 55,000 new EV chargers. That is about $600 million invested over five years to renew the zero-emission vehicle infrastructure program. This investment would mean 55,000 new EV chargers across Canada, with 9,000 in Quebec, 23,000 in Ontario, 17,000 in B.C. and many in Alberta and elsewhere. As I wrap up, I would like to highlight a few other measures. The first one is on sustainable finance. I would like to thank the leadership of the member for Whitby as we continue to develop a new sustainable bond framework for government issuance using made-in-Canada sustainable investment guidelines. The second is on marine conservation. It is worth highlighting the investment of $282 million over 11 years for the creation of two new national marine conservation areas, as well as support for three more in the north. Canada has set ambitious targets of 30% conservation of its land and oceans by 2030, and this will help us get there. If I may, I would also like to quickly mention that budget 2026 supports our national parks and historic sites. I would like to mention quickly the support for the Terry Fox Humanitarian Award, which does excellent work. In passing, my friend Ryan Keeping, who ran across Canada a few years ago, and his father, Scott Keeping, from Halifax are very big fans of Terry Fox. There is also the Canada groceries and essentials benefit program, which benefits all of us across our ridings. Third, support for the Francophonie summit is also crucial. That is important to us. In closing, budget 2026 is one that will help all Canadians, that is good for nature and the environment and that helps mitigate climate change.

Dane Lloyd, Parkland

Conservative
“The new budget gives a $2-billion annual tax break to Canada's oil and gas sector. We in Alberta are excited about this. I want the member to tell us how excited he is that his government is giving them this tax break.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I note that the hon. member is a climate change champion and that he talked a lot about the clean energy investments his government is making. I want to ask about the productivity mega tax deduction. It is estimated that this tax deduction will provide a $2-billion annual tax break to Canada’s oil and gas sector. We are certainly excited about that in Alberta. I wonder if the member could tell us how excited he is that his government is providing a $2-billion tax break to Canada’s oil and gas sector.

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“Our budget has many good measures in it. It includes funding for electricity and electric vehicle chargers that will help your communities.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 14 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think you are excited about the budget from yesterday. I am very enthused about yesterday’s budget. As I outlined, we had a lot of measures in there. I can sense your excitement. I know you are going to applaud the excitement for yesterday’s budget. You are looking forward to going back to your riding, talking about the electricity funding and probably even the EV chargers that might be installed in some of your communities—

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“This budget will help all communities.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in conclusion, I think the member will appreciate the positive impact this will have on all communities.

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“This budget is not green at all. It gives billions of dollars to fossil fuels, puts $43 billion toward an oil sands pipeline, and funds fracking. I want the member to answer me in French. Is he fine with continuing oil and gas subsidies and tearing down our climate plan?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is rather unbelievable that the government is sending out its green warriors this morning to try to make this budget seem green, when it is not green at all. What we are seeing this morning is greenwashing, and it is shameful to see the government members trying to make us believe that this is a green budget. I would like the member for Honoré-Mercier to answer me in French, because he mentioned the importance of the francophonie, but he only spoke French for about 20 seconds of his 10-minute speech. That is really something else. Let us talk about the environment. This budget includes billions of dollars in subsidies for fossil fuels. That money will be used to produce oil. It earmarks $43 billion for an oil sands pipeline. It includes funding to produce gas via hydraulic fracturing, which is banned in Quebec. Is the member for Honoré-Mercier comfortable with the government’s decision to continue with oil and gas subsidies? Is he comfortable with dismantling the climate change action plan, including industrial carbon pricing and the clean electricity strategy? Is he—

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal

Linked statement

“I want the member to vote for our budget. It funds 9,000 electric vehicle chargers in Quebec and cleaner power at Churchill Falls. Major environmental groups support this budget.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 34 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour to answer questions from my colleague from Repentigny. I have known my colleague, who used to be with Greenpeace, for nearly a decade. I am used to his opposition to all governments. I certainly hope that my colleague will be very excited that Quebec is getting 9,000 EV charging stations and that we are going to work in Churchill Falls to increase clean electricity generation. The Canadian Climate Institute supports our budget. Clean Energy Canada supports our budget. The Pembina Institute and the Transition Accelerator also support our budget. The list goes on and on. I work very hard on the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development with my colleague, and I very much look forward to him standing up and supporting our budget.

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The budget gives $1.2 billion for ferries in Atlantic Canada, but BC Ferries only gets a loan. Atlantic Canada gets $125 per person for ferry costs, while our region gets only $6. I want the government to invest fairly in Vancouver Island instead of ignoring us.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am really glad that my colleague talked about transportation. We saw, in the budget, $1.2 billion for Marine Atlantic, for Atlantic Canadian ferry infrastructure, which is critical, as I know, from coastal communities. It is our marine highway and we support that. When it comes to Vancouver Island and coastal communities, BC Ferries got nothing. In fact, we got a loan. We got an interest-bearing loan from the Canada Infrastructure Bank instead. This inequity is not nation-building. In fact, we get $6 per capita for operating costs. Atlantic Canadians get $125. When is the government going to stand up and invest in Vancouver Islanders and stop abandoning us? They elected two Liberal members. They have not done anything for us. They have abandoned Vancouver Islanders.

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“The budget has over $280 million to protect our oceans. Our goal is to protect 30% of our waters, which helps all Canadians, including people on Vancouver Island.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member opposite is a colleague and a great friend. I respect his advocacy for his riding enormously. I would like to highlight that in the budget there was over $280 million allocated for marine conservation. I am certain that the member will be very excited about our objective of increasing marine conservation from 15.5% up to 30%, which would benefit all Canadians, including the folks from Vancouver Island.

Tim Watchorn, Les Pays-d'en-Haut

Liberal
“My colleague supports saving energy and paying for green projects. Can he explain how this budget will help us do more of that?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague supports energy efficiency and funding for energy-efficient projects. Can he tell us a little more about how the budget will help us be more productive in that regard?

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“Our government is spending $2 billion on heat pumps for one million households. Lower-income Canadians will get $10,000 rebates. This will cut emissions and help the country.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent question. As members know, a few weeks ago our government announced a $2-billion heat pump program, which will benefit one million Canadian households. Rebates of $10,000 will be awarded to lower-income Canadians. This will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 megatonnes. This is very positive for Canada.

Michael Chong, Wellington—Halton Hills North

Conservative
“I want the House to vote against this budget. The government has no plan to balance the budget or lower the debt. Interest on the debt now costs 11 cents of every tax dollar, which is more than we spend on health care. High government borrowing pushes interest rates up and leaves us unprepared for future crises. This spending is not fixing the economy, food bank use is at a record high, and the government hid key details from Parliament.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the member for Calgary Crowfoot. This budget fails to establish a credible fiscal anchor to reduce the debt and to balance the budget. The fiscal anchors of Liberal budgets of the past decade were ever-changing and never met. The Prime Minister has continued with that practice. The national debt is increasing, interest costs are starting to take off and there is no plan to balance the budget. Here are the consequences. The Prime Minister risks losing credibility with financial markets because there is no credible fiscal anchor to reduce the debt and balance the budget. Canada’s experience in the mid-1990s demonstrates how quickly things can change when investors lose confidence. Debt crises have their small beginnings when interest expense grows faster than nominal GDP, and that is exactly what is happening. Interest expense on the debt is growing faster than nominal GDP, and interest on the national debt has now become the fastest-growing expense. Interest expense currently costs 11¢ of every tax dollar and is projected to rise to 14¢ in four short years. That is $85.5 billion a year, more than what the government spends on public health care. That is $8,000 a year for a typical family of four. Canada has the smallest of the G7 currencies, and ours is not a reserve currency. Canada also has some of the highest levels of household indebtedness in the world and some of the highest income taxes in the G7, which means that households already struggling to pay the bills and struggling with affordability have little ability to pay more in tax. Canada has some of the highest levels of subnational debt in the world, for which the federal government is the backstop. All this borrowing is also making life more unaffordable for individuals, families and companies. Massive increases in government debt compete with individuals, families and businesses for the money available to borrow from lenders. Lenders increase interest rates. The yields on the Government of Canada’s five- and ten-year bonds have been rising in recent years. These are key benchmarks that determine the bank’s cost of funds and interest rates for mortgages, lines of credit and car loans. These rising interest rates hit Canadian households particularly hard because of the high levels of household indebtedness in Canada, currently at $3.3 trillion. Another consequence of rising debt and interest costs is that Canada is rapidly losing fiscal capacity to deal with a future major crisis. In the last 20 years, Canada has faced two major crises: the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic. In those cases, Canada’s debt to GDP was roughly 30%, giving the government the fiscal firepower it needed to respond, and allowing the government to borrow upward of 5% to 15% of GDP in order to respond. The Prime Minister has stated, in his recently released national security strategy, that we must be prepared for a major crisis. It states that Canada needs to prepare for all contingencies up to and including war and other worst-case scenarios, and has put economic security at the heart of that plan. The next major crisis the Prime Minister says we must be prepared for requires fiscal capacity, just as was needed in 2008 and in 2020. The problem is that the debt is rising, and so are interest costs. They are reducing the capacity for the government to do that. The government’s debt to GDP is currently 40% and climbing, and interest costs are starting to take off. This is leaving less and less fiscal capacity to deal with a future crisis the Prime Minister says we must be prepared for. While the government is not facing an immediate fiscal impasse, it has become complacent in not having credible fiscal anchors to reduce the deficit and the growth of the national debt. All this spending in the budget also is not working. It is doubling down on what the previous Trudeau government did. In the Prime Minister’s first budget, deficits over five years were double that of Mr. Trudeau’s last budget. In the Prime Minister’s second budget, spending has been obscured by pushing it off the budget onto the balance sheet by capitalizing borrowing. For all the talk of increased business investment, employment growth and economic activity, little is showing up in the numbers. Food bank usage is at record highs, with some 2.35 million Canadians visiting a food bank each and every month, up 117% since 2019. Overall business capital formation has declined in five of the last six quarters and remains at the low levels of when Mr. Trudeau left office. Unemployment remains elevated, about 1% above pre-pandemic levels, because the economy is not generating enough jobs to push it down to roughly 5.5%. Productivity growth remains sluggish, if not non-existent, since the Bank of Canada declared a productivity emergency two and a half years ago. Economic growth remains stagnant, below 1% this year. All these things, food bank usage, overall business capital formation, unemployment, productivity and economic growth, have changed little in the last 18 months under the government. That is because the government has failed to introduce the fundamental supply side reforms necessary to spur investment, create growth, and raise incomes and paycheques for Canadians, reforms such as an overhaul of Canada’s competition policy to increase consumer choice and lower prices for struggling households; an overhaul of our taxes that the business community and experts have long called for in order to increase investment and incomes; an overhaul of our regulatory system, particularly for small- to medium-sized businesses; addressing interprovincial trade barriers; and so many other regulations that are strangling business and capital formation. The last thing I would like to say is this. This budget is an affront to Parliament. It is a travesty of a document. First of all, it is incoherent and impossible to understand. There are several definitions of net debt in this document. Its accounting definitions, operating versus investment, are so vague that even financial experts are finding it impossible to understand exactly what is going on. Off-budget items have been so massively expanded by capitalizing them on the balance sheet that the deficit figure has become a completely useless figure, and the debt is growing at more than twice the pace of the deficit. Here is the bigger travesty. The fact we had to wait this long to get the document is an outrage. The government made numerous announcements contained in the document months ago, outside the fiscal framework and outside Parliament. Parliamentarians should not have to learn about $36 billion in tax expenditures at some investment conference in downtown Toronto through the nightly news. This is the place where the Prime Minister should be telling Canadians how much the government plans to spend, how much it plans to tax, and how much it plans to borrow. The government has spent most of the last year announcing spending and taxation at its own organized conferences and its own contrived photo ops outside Parliament. To add insult to injury, when it does finally have an opportunity to tell us exactly what is going on in the budget, it is obscured by all sorts of financial chicanery. Finally, the head of government, for whom the budget document is supposed to be an aspirational and generational blueprint, is jetting off to yet another around-the-world tour, leaving us to pick through whatever gobbledygook this is. I have a message for the Prime Minister. This is not Goldman Sachs. This is not Brookfield. This is the Parliament of Canada, and democratic accountability in this place, particularly over the public purse and taxation, is sacrosanct. It is time to start showing up in Parliament and to start answering some questions.

Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault, Madawaska—Restigouche

Liberal
“Our budget manages money responsibly. Our debt is shrinking compared to our economy, and we hit our financial targets early. Because trade is uncertain, we should spend money to help businesses, grow the economy, stop homelessness, and fund our military. I want to know if the member agrees that we should spend money on these priorities.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Clarity 35 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I believe our budget reflects a very responsible fiscal approach. In fact, the debt-to-GDP ratio is falling, and we achieved our fiscal targets a full year ahead of schedule. Moreover, in a period of trade uncertainty, it is important to invest and stimulate the Canadian economy, support our small and medium-sized enterprises and to make essential investments, such as in the fight against homelessness, for example. With that in mind, the question I have for my colleague is this: Does he agree that we should make use of our fiscal flexibility? Canada is in a strong fiscal position to invest in Canadians’ priorities, whether that means tackling homelessness, strengthening our national defence or supporting economic growth across the country.

Michael Chong, Wellington—Halton Hills North

Conservative
“We are not in a crisis now, but the government must prepare for future ones. In 2008 and 2020, Canada had to spend a lot of money to help people. Our national debt is now 10% higher than it was then. This budget makes it much harder for us to handle the next crisis.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the problem is that, although we are not currently in a fiscal crisis, the government needs to prepare for future crises like the ones in 2008 or 2020, which forced the government to spend a great deal of money to support our fellow Canadians. The problem with the government’s budget is that the national debt is 10% higher than it was in 2008 and 2020. The government is considerably reducing its ability to respond to a future crisis.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 164

  1. Government Orders The Budget 27 statements
  2. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Budget 10 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Budget 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Canadian Heritage 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  12. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Aviation Industry 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Points of Order 9 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Budget 4 statements
  18. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions News Media Industry 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions The Budget 2 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 16 statements
  23. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  24. Government Orders The Budget 36 statements