A massive bill to implement the federal budget. It touches everything from taxes to banking to food safety to the Canada Pension Plan. In debate, MPs spent time making partisan jabs, talking about their ridings, and discussing things only vaguely related to the bill, like the IMF and U.S. relations, rather than the bill's actual contents.
“I want to create a contrast where Liberals look generous and opposition looks stingy. I want my riding to think government is investing in them. The design of the funds hasn't been publicly announced yet, but I want people to think that consultations are under way.”
“I want my constituents to think the government is working hard for them. The spring economic update includes many measures that put money directly into people's pockets. I will list them all to create the impression of the government doing a lot. The government is spending billions on housing and infrastructure projects that will benefit my riding and make me look good.”
“I'm filling time by listing good-news numbers for an airport in my riding. The real point is I want taxpayers to spend more on programs I like there. And I want my constituents to think I made all good things happen.”
“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later. Look over here at this other thing we're doing instead. I don't want to answer the real question about our double standard. We're better than those other countries I think.”
“I like that Red Seal program. The government wants 80,000 to 100,000 new workers in skilled trades. I think that sounds good. I want to hear more kind words about that.”