Business of Supply

The debate focused heavily on the government’s decision to cancel a digital services levy on foreign tech giants, particularly concerning its impact on Canadian and Quebec culture. Opposition members argued that removing the tax harmed the cultural sector by forcing taxpayers to pay the costs, and criticized the government for making trade deals that negatively affected Francophone culture. Members of the Liberal government defended the cancellation as a necessary measure related to trade discussions and maintained that the government actively supports the arts and diverse communities across Canada through budget allocations. Conservative members also questioned the government’s record on policy delivery, specifically regarding commitments made in trade talks.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

13 statements

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“I am proud of the Prime Minister for standing up to the United States to protect the French language and Quebec culture. I want to know if the member is proud of that too.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague talked a lot about Donald Trump. I know that discussions between Canada and the United States are ongoing, but I am very proud of our Prime Minister, who rejected U.S. moves that threatened the French language and Quebec culture. Is the member as proud as I am and very happy about that?

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Life is already too expensive in this country. Adding costs for the CRTC will make life more expensive for people in Quebec. We should not do it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have an affordability crisis in this country right now. I think that if we add on expenses for the CRTC, or Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, costs will rise for all Quebeckers. What makes this a good time for that? I do not think it is warranted.

Arielle Kayabaga, London West

Liberal
“I disagree with this motion. Culture is central to communities all across Canada, not just Quebec. Our government is supporting artists, musicians, and local media across the country, including francophones outside Quebec. The arts bring in billions of dollars and support thousands of jobs, and our funding helps keep those jobs and cultures alive.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. I want to start by discussing one of the statements in today’s opposition motion. It says that “culture is central to Quebec’s identity”. However, culture is also central to the identity of communities across Canada. I think every community is shaped by its culture. Culture is what enlivens communities and brings them to life. This reality affects not only Quebec, but also Canada and all the communities that make it up. I am very pleased to have the opportunity today to talk about this motion and inform not only Quebeckers, but also all Canadians of the commitments we have made to support creators and cultural workers, as well as the communities that benefit every day from their work. Think of the filmmaker telling the history of their region, the musician recording their first songs, or the journalist giving a voice to the people in their community. To complete their project, they need resources, partners and a long-term vision. Through their work, we learn about experiences that are different from our own. We are introduced to places, voices and stories that are hard to find elsewhere but that contribute to the vitality of our communities. However, we know that the conditions under which this work is accomplished are often difficult and that audience habits are changing. Revenue streams are shifting and funding is becoming more uncertain. Artists, production teams, businesses and local media are all affected by this pressure. Communities are also affected when a project cannot be carried out or when a story is at risk of not being told. When a news team scales back its activities, a region may lose some of its local coverage. As a government, we take these challenges very seriously. Culture is part of what brings us together here in Canada. A song can remind us of our childhood or stay with us for many years. A TV series can give us a glimpse into the life of another community that we are not familiar with. I would like to take this opportunity to return to the topic of Ishaka, the dance troupe I mentioned this week during members’ statements. I noted that it is a group of Burundian Canadians. Some of its members were born here in Canada, while others have brought Burundi’s rich culture to this country. Today, thanks to the cultivation and transmission of songs, poems, and the entire cultural heritage preserved by our elders, we see the youngest members of the Burundian community learning about this culture. They can now speak Kirundi and French, because in Burundi, the primary languages are Kirundi and French. They are learning songs that their grandparents sang many years ago. Last week, I had the opportunity to go on stage and dance with them. Even though I had never danced a Burundian dance in my life, I was lucky enough to share that moment with the members of Ishaka. I was able to reconnect with the culture passed down to me by my ancestors and parents and bring it back to life right here, in my own country, in the city of Ottawa. Above all, I was able to perform on the same stage at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa that superstars like Céline Dion have graced. It was a moment that moved me deeply. What touched me most was seeing young children, little girls and boys aged four of five, embracing this culture. The production brought together nearly 300 people and featured 54 songs on stage, all inspired by Burundian Canadian culture. The goal was not only to pass on Burundian culture but also to adapt it to modern times, within the context of our lives today, here in Ottawa. As I was saying, our government understands the importance of culture, the importance of language, the importance of songs, the importance of sharing poems and information, whether in French, English or any other language. Earlier, my colleague mentioned Punjabi, a language he uses and hears in his community. He also talked about the Filipino community in his riding. All of these cultural expressions need to be passed on through the networks and resources we have. That is why, as a government, we take the importance of funding and supporting our communities very seriously, so that they can continue to tell these stories, sing these songs and disseminate information in the languages spoken in communities across Canada and Quebec. These experiences create shared cultural references, bring generations closer together and strengthen a sense of belonging, as I just mentioned. We want creators from across Canada to be able to nurture these connections and we want new voices to be heard. This also means safeguarding the jobs and skills that make their work possible. In 2024, the audiovisual and interactive media sector contributed more than $20 billion to Canada’s GDP and accounted for more than 172,000 jobs. Sound recording and music publishing contributed more than $542 million to GDP and accounted for about 5,500 jobs. Behind these numbers are actors, technicians, editors and directors. There are also the businesses and suppliers that help sustain the economies of the regions where these productions are made. We want these people to be able to build careers here and pass on their knowledge to the next generation. Widespread appreciation for our musical talent, for example, shows what we can achieve. The accolades received by Charlotte Cardin, Louis-Jean Cormier and Talk are an excellent example. When it comes to supporting our musical artists, the Canada Music Fund is the main financial support program for commercially driven Canadian music. It aims to connect a wide range of Canadian artists with audiences around the world. The program provides financial support to Canadian artists and to music companies and music organizations owned and controlled by Canadians for a variety of activities that enhance the visibility of Canadian artists at home and abroad. In the last budget, we committed $48 million over three years to the Canada Music Fund, starting in 2026-27, to advance our artists’ careers while strengthening the music sector’s competitiveness and stability. The fund’s entire budget is redistributed by non-profit organizations like the Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings, in the anglophone market, and Musicaction, in the francophone market. The music industry generates economic activity through performances and drives other important economic sectors, including tourism, entertainment and advertising. It is also crucial to support Canada’s francophone music sector. The sector is confronting major challenges, and its listenership has dropped significantly. Supporting our francophone artists is essential. I would add that it is thanks to the determination of London’s francophone community that there are now 11 French-language elementary schools in London, Ontario. This community has long fought to keep this culture alive. I have a child who attends a French-language school, who can live their life in French, who can work in French, and who listens to music by French-Canadian artists. That is only possible because we have invested in preserving our culture, which is important. When I left Montreal to move to London, there were only four or five francophone elementary schools. Today, there are 11. Not only have we been able to continue living in French and preserve the francophone culture, but we have also seen that culture grow; the francophone community in London continues to grow. There are several reasons for this, of course, but it is partly because we work hard to live in French, continue speaking French and listen to music in French. I could speak at length about the importance of preserving francophone culture both outside and within Quebec. Unfortunately, I do not have enough time. With that, I am ready to take questions from my colleagues.

Arielle Kayabaga, London West

Liberal
“Talking about French speakers in London is not off topic. I can keep my French language and culture because our government supports francophones inside and outside Quebec. The experiences of people in London matter in this House.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, although I have the utmost respect for my colleague, I still find it sad to hear him say that discussing London’s francophones is off topic when it comes to culture. The reason I am able to keep my language, preserve my francophone identity and live fully in French with my family today is because our government continues to support francophone culture both within and outside Quebec. It saddens me a little to hear my colleague say that the messages or experiences of the people of London, Ontario, are irrelevant in the House.

Arielle Kayabaga, London West

Liberal
“We want to help Canadian artists and local productions without passing extra costs on to Canadians. During this crisis, we are working to protect people from paying unnecessary fees.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 20 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I greatly appreciate my colleague’s questions. I do not think that the question he is asking has a set answer. What we have been saying for a while is that we are working to ensure that we do not add any costs that would be passed on to Canadians. The goal is to help our artists and to keep and protect productions in Canada. The goal is not to make Canadians’ lives more complicated, but really to ensure that no costs are passed on to them. I think that my colleague would also agree that, during a crisis that we did not ask for and that we are currently experiencing across Canada, we must protect Canadians. We want to make sure that Canadians do not continue to pay unnecessary fees. That is what our government is doing.

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Our last budget supported the arts and culture sector across Canada, and I hope the next budget does too. What does my colleague think of that support?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our government introduced a number of measures in budget 2025 to support the cultural sector in Quebec and across the country, and I hope we will do the same again in budget 2026. Could my colleague share her thoughts on those measures?

Arielle Kayabaga, London West

Liberal
“Our government supports CBC/Radio-Canada, festivals, and Canadian artists in this year's budget. The next budget will do even more to protect Canadian culture, especially French-language content.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am very grateful to my colleague for her question. Obviously, as has already been mentioned in the House, our government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada, for example, as well as festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists. We are protecting our artists in budget 2025. I am sure that in the upcoming budget 2026, there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content, especially content made by francophones.

Claude Guay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“Our cultural sector supports 172,000 jobs and shares our stories with the world. The industry is facing big challenges as technology and audience habits change. The government is supporting workers and creators with funding, rules for online streaming platforms, and plans to modernize our arts programs. I am ready to answer questions.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise in the House today to talk about the importance of the cultural sector, its future and its workers. I am pleased to do so. The cultural sector provides 172,000 jobs across the country for artists, creators, broadcasters, writers and video game programmers. They perform a multitude of roles in front of and behind the camera, on stage and behind the scenes. Behind a show are screenwriters, crews and sound and editing specialists. Behind an album are artists, directors, technicians and partners who work to bring it to audiences. Each new project creates work for those teams. It allows businesses to draw on their suppliers, gives emerging professionals an opportunity to gain experience, and enables established workers to pass on their know-how. That is how an industry is through: through a continuous stream of projects, the experience gained along the way and the capacity to reinvest in future opportunities. We want to preserve that expertise in Canada. We want to empower businesses to build on their successes. We want Canadian artists, workers and cultural enterprises to be able to build their future here. We want their talents to translate into projects, jobs and opportunities for growth both at home and abroad. Their contribution, through their creativity, expertise and dedication, extends far beyond the economy. These are the people who bring to life the stories that define us, that reflect the diversity of our experiences and that showcase Quebec and Canadian culture at home and abroad. Our talented artists have demonstrated their ability to connect with audiences around the world. In recent years, television series such as Empathie and Heated Rivalry have enjoyed great success. Artists such as the members of Angine de Poitrine, whose alien language is somewhat beyond me, are making their mark all over the world. Robert Lepage, Denis Villeneuve and Yannick Nézet‑Séguin are all artists who are a source of pride for us and who are recognized both here and abroad. Their success raises the profile of our creators and the expertise of our teams. We want others to be able to follow in their footsteps and develop their careers. We recognize, however, that the sector is facing significant challenges. Traditional media revenues are under pressure, audience habits continue to evolve, and companies must adapt their business models. When a production is delayed, the consequences are felt by the whole team; contracts become less frequent and income less predictable. The next generation may find fewer opportunities to learn and gain initial experience. In the long term, this uncertainty may jeopardize our ability to retain talent and keep experienced teams in place. We must address immediate needs while laying the groundwork for future growth. Last June, our government announced a $600-million investment to provide stability and immediate support to the audiovisual sector. We recognize the importance of this investment, which will be distributed to the sector as soon as possible. This is a commitment the government has made. We want to support the ability to create and distribute Canadian content. We also want to keep services accessible and affordable so that families can continue to watch Canadian movies and TV shows and listen to our artists. The sector’s strength also relies on fair contributions by all broadcasting system participants, including online streaming services, to support the creation and promotion of Quebec and Canadian content. The Online Streaming Act made it possible to incorporate these services into the broadcasting framework. The CRTC developed the regulatory obligations applicable to the audio and audiovisual sector. We announced our plans to review certain requirements, draft new policies and maintain strong support for our content while taking the different business models and the cost of services to households into account. We are also looking for ways to modernize our institutions and the funding mechanisms that support the audiovisual industry. We want our policy tools to better support companies throughout their development, from the creation of a project to its dissemination to audiences. The advisory group that met this year underscored the importance of intellectual property, distribution, audience development and revenue. We want Canadian businesses to be able to keep more of the value inherent in their creations. This would enable them to reinvest, develop new projects and strengthen their presence in the market. We are also looking into creating a new federal body that would merge Telefilm Canada, the National Film Board and the Canada Media Fund and broaden their mandates. However, a decision has not yet been made in that regard. The sector’s future also depends on skills and workers. Artificial intelligence, which is important to mention, and all the changes in technology have changed the way things are done. What we want is for workers to be able to continue learning, for the next generation to develop its expertise and for businesses to have the ability to experiment and innovate. We want the regions and groups that face more barriers to also benefit from these opportunities. It is also important to mention indigenous sovereignty, as well as inclusion and fairness, which must also guide this discussion. We are also giving equal attention to people who work in our media sector. Producing accurate news requires journalists, production teams and time to investigate, verify facts and explain what is happening. Preserving this capacity is essential to democratic life, particularly when misinformation spreads quickly. In the spring economic update, we announced our intention to consult on expanding the Canadian journalism labour tax credit to include audio and audiovisual production. We want the future of these sectors to offer opportunities in all communities. Francophone creators must be able to create and reach their audiences. Indigenous creators must be able to share their stories and languages. Official language minority communities must see their realities reflected in our media. This diversity fuels creativity and enriches the content available to the public. It contributes to our sense of belonging and strengthens the bonds between communities. We therefore want to support an industry capable of offering opportunities to these workers, developing talent, and helping local businesses in this sector to grow. As we prepare for this future, we will support jobs and the expertise that is so valuable. We are also preserving our ability to create right here in Canada, from coast to coast to coast. We want to tell our stories, the stories of all the different communities in our beautiful country, and share them with the world, not just here at home. I will now answer my colleagues’ questions.

Claude Guay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“We will still provide the $600 million for arts and culture, and more details will come soon. On top of that, we have already started giving out another $550 million to Canadian media, film, and arts groups.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the government, I am pleased to share its commitment to provide the $600 million that my colleague mentioned. A lot more information will be provided in the coming days. I look forward to it. That said, I also want to inform my colleague that in addition to the $600 million, another $550 million has already been distributed: $192 million to the CBC/Radio‑Canada; $150 million to Telefilm Canada; $127 million to the Canada Media Fund; $48 million to the Canada Music Fund; $26 million to the National Film Board of Canada; and $6 million to the Canada Council for the Arts. Most of these amounts, except for the funds provided to CBC/Radio‑Canada, will be spread out over three years, although the distribution has already started. I thank my colleague for her question and for the opportunity to share this information.

Claude Guay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“We need to adapt when things change instead of using old ideas that do not work. Money meant for the cultural sector never reached it because of lawsuits. That is why we chose to try a different approach.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 22 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to highlight my colleague’s remarks earlier this afternoon in this debate. I completely agreed with him when he said that it is necessary to learn. When things change, it is necessary to adapt. It is a bad idea to always fall back on formulas that do not work. By the way, I did not hear the discussion, but the money that was supposed to come from those media outlets was not distributed. No one in the cultural sector benefited from it, because there were lawsuits. It went to court. That money could not be distributed to the cultural sector. Our cultural environment did not benefit from it. That is why we decided to take a different approach.

Tatiana Auguste, Terrebonne

Liberal
“We asked for funding for culture in the budget, and we got it. I want to hear what the member thinks about culture funding requests from other members.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, many members on this side of the House stood up for culture and requested funding in budget 2025. In the end, we got it. I would like to hear what my colleague has to say about some of the other members of the House’s culture-related requests.

Claude Guay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“The Conservatives asked for no culture funding and wanted to cut CBC and Radio-Canada. The Bloc Québécois put forward this motion, but they did not ask for culture funding in the last budget either.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her question, which will give me the opportunity to clarify what has happened in recent months and over the past year. As members know, the Conservative Party did not make any culture-related requests. The Conservatives even wanted to take a step backward and cut funding for CBC/Radio‑Canada. They never mentioned providing more funding for French content or for culture. It is also important to note that the motion was moved by the Bloc Québécois, who did not make any culture-related requests in the last budget. I find it a bit rich that we have this motion before us today to debate when the Bloc did not make any specific culture-related requests at budget time.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I am asking everyone to agree to move the clock to 5:30 p.m. so we can start private members' hour.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I suspect if you were to canvass the House, you would find unanimous consent at this time to call it 5:30 p.m. so we can begin private members’ hour.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 153

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 51 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  3. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 14 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 15 statements
  12. Oral Questions Employment 3 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Sports 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Points of Order 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Business of Supply 31 statements
  19. Oral Questions Government Priorities 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  21. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 30 statements
  23. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements