ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

During routine proceedings, the natural resources committee’s report on developing Canada’s critical minerals was tabled, with a request for a full government response. A Conservative member tabled a dissenting report, arguing the Impact Assessment Act should be repealed to shorten approvals, cut red tape and respect provincial jurisdiction, and calling for faster approvals for mining projects currently waiting.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Terry Duguid, Winnipeg South

Liberal
“I am presenting a committee report on mining critical minerals in Canada. The committee wants the government to write a full response to it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the third report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, entitled “‘An Extraordinary Opportunity for Canada’: The Development of Critical Minerals”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report.

Corey Tochor, Saskatoon—University

Conservative
“I am presenting our report. We want the government to cancel the Impact Assessment Act to cut red tape and approve projects faster. This law has stopped many mining projects. We want to speed up approval for all mining projects that are currently waiting.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to table our dissenting report, because what we heard at committee was 10 years of wasted time with these Liberals. Our dissenting report goes through the repealing of the Impact Assessment Act to shorten approvals, eliminate red tape and respect provincial jurisdiction. This is very important, because we have heard of many mining projects that have been shelved because of this act. We also, in this report, talk about the fast-tracking of all current mining-related projects stuck in the federal regulatory queue. That is supported by industry. With the Major Projects Office, one witness warned that “looking to attract investment through the bottleneck of the MPO is unlikely to produce the outcomes that we’re looking for.” For that and many other good reasons, we submit our dissenting report on what we should do as a nation.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 121

  1. Private Members' Business Criminal Code 10 statements
  2. Private Members' Business Points of Order 2 statements
  3. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 37 statements
  4. Government Orders Government Orders 17 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Foreign Investment 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 10 statements
  14. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions CBC/Radio-Canada 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Privilege 4 statements
  20. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  22. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 61 statements
  24. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  25. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 2 statements
  26. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  27. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  30. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  31. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 41 statements