Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

Bill C-38, Canadian Fuel Affordability Act · Report stage · now law Where it stands

What the law does

The law extends the temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027. Between February 1, 2027, and March 31, 2027, excise tax rates on fuels are set at 50% of their regular rates.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

55 statements

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“We agree to let the Conservatives split their speaking time at third reading, but only after we finish the report stage.”
Official Hansard

Yes, Mr. Speaker, we are prepared to give unanimous consent to split the time at third reading for the Conservatives once we get through report stage.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. Wars and global problems have pushed gas prices up and made life expensive. This bill temporarily pauses the fuel tax to save drivers up to 10 cents a litre.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise to take part in today’s important debate on the third reading of Bill C-38, the Canadian fuel affordability act. This bill aims to extend the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel and aviation fuels. This is a very important issue at a time when many Canadian families continue to face a high cost of living. Some of them find it difficult to afford groceries, fill up their gas tank and pay all their bills. Before we continue, I would like to clarify a few things about the affordability challenges we are all facing. Let me start by saying that this is a global issue. Ultimately, all OECD countries are now feeling the effects of an affordability crisis that is challenging for many households. We need to try to put this into context. In fact, we need to go back to the time of the COVID‑19 pandemic. I know that seems like a long time ago, but it really had a significant impact on the global economy, especially in the period following the COVID‑19 pandemic, when consumer spending here, as elsewhere, rebounded very quickly, even as supply chains remained disrupted and were not yet operating at full capacity. This led to high and rapid inflation, here as elsewhere. In Canada, for example, the inflation rate reached 8%, a level not seen in generations. As a result, many Canadians, as well as Americans, Europeans, and Japanese, were caught off guard by this rapid rise in inflation and all the upheaval it caused. Just as we were starting to get a bit of a handle on the situation, the war in Ukraine broke out, triggering a sharp increase in energy prices due to the entirely justified boycott of Russian oil and natural gas exports. Ironically, some countries are currently backtracking on that boycott, but that is a discussion for another day. All of that contributed to a sharp increase in energy prices, which has kept inflation high and forced central banks to raise interest rates very quickly. This rise in interest rates also had an impact on housing affordability, as mortgage rates suddenly began to rise rapidly. Meanwhile, very few Canadian households were prepared to cope with those rising mortgage rates. In many cases, they rose from barely 1% to 3%, 4% or 5%. Needless to say, that can dramatically alter a family’s budget. Thus, a global crisis and a full-blown energy crisis were followed by shocks in food production, since Ukraine was also a major grain exporter. The price of raw food materials, in particular, rose rapidly as a result. All of this happened at the same time and, to make matters worse, in February 2026, a new war broke out in the Middle East, which led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Suddenly the price of oil was back up to $100 a barrel. Just when things were beginning to get back to normal, everything went off the rails again. This situation began a long time ago outside of Canada, and it is complicated for us and for other countries. It is also worth noting, and so I will point it out, that there is a difference between the very high cost of living caused by all of the crises that I just mentioned, which caused price increases year after year, and the rate of inflation. As we saw this week, the inflation rate in Canada is currently 3.1% , which is not that far outside the Bank of Canada’s target range. The biggest factor driving inflation right now, in September and October 2026, is energy prices, gas prices. In Canada, the inflation rate is less than 2% if we exclude gasoline. The most recent shocks that have occurred since February 2026 because of the war in the Middle East are having a major impact on inflation. Inflation is returning to the target range, but the cost of living remains very high. That is the situation we are facing today. Similar conditions exist in many parts of the world. Naturally, our government cannot control decisions made elsewhere. What we can control, however, is what we do here at home. We can put in place measures that help families and households cope with these challenges. In a situation where the shock is external and persistent, government measures must be targeted, timely and temporary. They must be phased out quickly, because there is no certainty as to how long these external pressures may last. Through Bill C‑38, we will make it possible for millions of Canadians to save money by continuing to suspend the excise tax on gasoline. Canadians who drive to work and those who take their children to school or to sporting activities can continue to do so. The bill proposes to extend the suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027. In February and March 2027, rates will then gradually return to just half their usual level, before returning, on April 1, 2027, to what they were. Canadians will therefore keep receiving relief of up to 10¢ a litre until January 31. Since that announcement was made, and although the price of crude oil remains above $100 a barrel, the price of gasoline has increased a bit, but remains relatively stable. As we had hoped, this shows that extending the excise tax suspension is directly benefiting Canadian consumers. We have seen all that take effect now. The government estimates that this extension will provide about $2.9 billion in additional tax relief to Canadians, raising the total fuel tax relief to approximately $5.3 billion in the 2026-27 fiscal year. It is important to mention that the cost of this to the government is substantial, at $5.3 billion. We are well aware that it is substantial. We are well aware that it takes effort, but it is effort that the government is willing to make, considering the steep rise in fuel prices confronting Canadian households. Something had to be done, and we acted quickly by implementing targeted measures aimed at lowering the price of gas. This is a temporary measure because, of course, we, like everyone else, want the crude oil market to return to more normal, stable levels, similar to where it was before hostilities broke out in late February 2026. We will reassess this at the appropriate time, but we are confident that this is a temporary situation and that our support measures should also be temporary. However, as I said, it is a substantial amount. We need to find a way to fit this $5.3 billion into the federal budget. As the Minister of Finance mentioned earlier today, the budget will be tabled on November 5, and we will be able to measure the progress of Canada’s public finances at that time. All that to say that $5.3 billion is no small sum. Canadian households can count on this significant support to help them get through this tough period. This measure is in addition to other measures that we have already put in place, such as the Canada groceries and essentials benefit and the tax cuts that we had previously made. These are a few measures that we have put in place and that we believe are necessary to help people get through this situation, but we should not assume that they will be permanent, because, as I just mentioned, the cost to the public purse is pretty substantial. However, there is a real need and we are in a real emergency, which fully justifies this situation. Bill C‑38 is a necessary tool. We have clearly recognized this reality, and we are responding to it. As Canadians continue to suffer the consequences of an uncertain global context, our government is taking action to help them. Bill C‑38 is a perfect example of that. It is a targeted measure that will help all Canadians cope with the cost of living. This is a measure that will provide real, direct help to families, workers and businesses. I therefore enthusiastically urge everyone here in the House to support Bill C‑38 and vote in favour of it.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“This fuel tax break is temporary. The bill says the full tax comes back automatically in April 2027.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Bill C‑38 clearly states that, as of January 2027, the suspension of the excise tax will be reduced by half and that on April 1, we will return to where we were before. Yes, the tax suspension will be eliminated. We will go back to where we were. That is why I have said several times that this is a temporary measure.

Louis Villeneuve, Brome—Missisquoi

Liberal
“Other rich countries are acting on this crisis. My colleague is an economist, so I want him to explain why we must pass this fuel tax bill quickly to help people.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is an economist, and I would like him to explain something to us. He touched on it in his speech. The countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, are responding to the current crisis. In this context, why do we need to quickly pass Bill C‑38 to help our constituents?

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“High fuel prices are a global problem, and world economic groups say governments should use temporary measures to help. Countries like Spain and Germany are temporarily lowering fuel prices right now. This oil price spike will not last forever, and prices will drop again once the shipping routes clear up. We should pass this temporary relief until that happens.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is indeed a global situation that affects not only Canada, but also all other countries. What is being suggested, whether by the OECD, the International Monetary Fund or even the World Bank, in the face of a shock like the one we are currently experiencing, is that governments respond in a targeted, temporary way. That is what is happening elsewhere. That is what is happening in some European countries, in Spain, for example, and in Germany as well. These are temporary measures that are lowering fuel prices. Everyone wants that. Everyone assumes that the oil shock is artificial in some way, because it is caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and that eventually this situation will subside and oil prices will return to where they were before, around $60 to $70 a barrel. Then we will no longer require the kind of assistance that is currently being implemented.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“The date is set in the bill. Gas prices are high right now because oil costs more, and we hope that gets better soon. This tax cut will end in March 2027.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the date is in the bill. The current situation reflects the rise in crude oil prices. Like everyone else, we hope this situation will be resolved. The measure we will be voting on here in the House expires at the end of March 2027.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“This bill keeps the fuel tax cut until January 2027. We will decide what happens after that when the time comes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the tax cut will remain in effect until January 2027. That is what Bill C‑38 proposes. What happens after that will happen after that.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“I want us to vote on this bill soon. It keeps the fuel tax paused until 2027 and then slowly brings it back by April. We can only control what happens until then, not what happens after.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we will be voting soon, I hope, on Bill C‑38, which provides that, starting in January 2027, the suspension of the tax will gradually decrease, and then in April, we will return to where we were before. What will happen in April? I am no psychic. I cannot predict what will happen, but whatever we can control, we control. This is how it will be until April 1. After that, it will be in God’s hands.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“This bill brings back the 10-cent fuel tax on April 1, 2027. I do not know if there will be another bill after that.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under Bill C‑38, the excise tax of 10¢ a litre will be reinstated on April 1, 2027. That is what the bill provides for. Will there be another bill down the road? I have no idea. We will see when the time comes. However, according to this bill, the excise tax of 10¢ a litre will be reinstated on April 1, 2027.

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“This bill has an end date. That is simply how it is written.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in less than 15 seconds, I will say that Bill C‑38 has an expiration date. That is how it is.

Louis Villeneuve, Brome—Missisquoi

Liberal
“This bill will bring quick, real help to millions of Canadians by cutting fuel taxes. I want to know if the Conservatives will support it or stand in its way.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, whom I respect very much, for his speech. In his speech, he said that we had announced some good news with this bill but that it was not enough. That is a valid argument. I think reasonable people can have opposing views on the best course of action. However, I think there is no question that this measure will bring concrete and immediate relief to millions of Canadians. Will the Conservative Party support the bill or stand in the way of it? Is the Conservative Party prepared to work with the government to make life more affordable for Canadians?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Cutting this fuel tax will help lower costs for regular people. Manitoba did this, and it helped make life more affordable there. I am asking the member to admit that this tax cut gives Canadians the break they need right now.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, of course the tax break would be passed on to the consumer, and that is something the government does watch for. The idea of what would take place is not necessarily a new idea. In fact, Wab Kinew, to his credit, after the last provincial election in Manitoba, did the same thing, and it did provide relief and dealt with, in part, the issue of affordability. My question to the member opposite is this: Does he not agree that providing this sort of tax relief would at the very least address the issue of affordability for a period of time when Canadians need to get that break?

Louis Villeneuve, Brome—Missisquoi

Liberal
“I know living costs are high, and my own family feels it too. But no one can be sure what oil prices will be in six to 12 months. The government is acting responsibly by being careful.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am a father and a grandfather, and my own father is 94 years old. We are all experiencing the challenges that you are talking about. My question is this: Do you believe that you can predict with certainty where oil prices will be in six to 12 months? I believe that the government is acting responsibly by proceeding the way it is.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives want to get rid of the gas tax forever. I want to know which other taxes they plan to get rid of forever.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have heard from a couple of Conservative speakers that the Conservative Party’s position is to permanently get rid of the gas excise tax. Are there other taxes that the Conservatives would permanently get rid of?

Louis Villeneuve, Brome—Missisquoi

Liberal
“The Bloc Québécois voted to pause the fuel tax before because it was necessary. Things around the world have not gotten better since then, and people in my riding say our measures help them. The Parti Québécois wants to end the federal fuel tax permanently. Does the Bloc agree with that?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I always enjoy listening to my colleague, and I dream of one day being able to speak so eloquently. I think that if he goes back to teach economics, I will sign up. I want to go back to the fact that my colleague said that the Bloc Québécois initially voted for the measure because it was necessary. However, the situation around the world has not improved since then. I do not think we can say that things have stabilized very well. My constituents in the riding of Brome—Missisquoi have been telling me how much the measures the government is putting in place are helping them. We are not creating measures just for the sake of burning money. That is not the goal. The goal is to help our constituents. My question is this. The Parti Québécois, which came to power in Quebec City, called for a permanent suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline. Does the Bloc Québécois share that position as well?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Our fuel tax cut has directly helped Canadians. The premier of Manitoba did the same thing. I think the Bloc is just looking for an excuse to vote against this bill, and I want the member to answer to that.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 42 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I respect the economic background the member brings to the House, but I think of economists, and I think we can get all sorts of differing opinions. At the end of the day, and let us be very clear, the excise tax break that was implemented by the government has directly benefited the consumers of Canada. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Also, Wab Kinew did this very same thing following a provincial election. It seems to me that the Bloc members are trying to find an excuse as to why they might vote against the legislation to justify their actions. I wonder if the member could provide comments on that.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I want to ask the Bloc members a question. Would they support temporarily removing the federal tax on gas?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let us further that discussion. Let us say that the principle of providing the tax deduction in the form of the excise tax on gas has been clearly demonstrated to members of the Bloc. In principle, would they support getting rid of the excise tax on a temporary basis?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. Cutting the tax on fuel helps lower-income people. It lowers costs for public transit like buses and taxis, and it helps city budgets. It gives everyone a break when gas prices are changing and life is expensive.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let us further advance this issue to low-income individuals. When tax is reduced on gas for public transportation, whether it is buses or taxis, which are often used by all sectors of society, there is a direct benefit for that in municipal budgets, which decreases pressure. At a time when gas prices are volatile and the issue of affordability is there, it seems to make a whole lot of sense to give Canadians a break on affordability by providing this excise tax, because it covers everyone.

John-Paul Danko, Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas

Liberal
“Canada is not broken, and I am proud of our record. Global events made living costs go up for everyone, including the pandemic, Donald Trump's trade war against Canada, tension with Iran, and Russia's war in Ukraine. I want the opposition to admit that these world events are driving up fuel and other costs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, first of all, Canada is not broken, and I am proud of our record as a government. What the opposition seems to forget is that we went through the management of the most severe public health crisis in the past century. The COVID pandemic disrupted established supply chains and drove up costs for everyone, not only in Canada but around the world. The opposition also conveniently ignores Donald Trump’s illegal, unnecessary trade war against Canada. It ignores Donald Trump’s war against Iran, which has choked off the supply of fuel around the world, and Russia’s war against Ukraine and Ukraine’s retaliatory strikes against Russian refinery infrastructure, which also drove up the cost of fuel. Will the members opposite acknowledge the reality of the global political issues going on in the world that are causing costs to rise?

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“The Conservatives say they worry about the deficit, but their plan would add even more debt. I want to know if the Conservatives will vote for this fuel tax bill or not.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 27 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague pointed out that we voted against the Conservative motion earlier today. At the same time, she worries about the deficit but would have us increase it even more with the measures that were included in her party’s motion. I have a very simple question: Will the Conservative Party vote for Bill C-38 or not?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 151

  1. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 79 statements
  2. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 5 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 15 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Culture and Identity 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions International Trade 7 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 44 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Revenue Agency Act 6 statements
  20. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 164 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements