Business of Supply

The debate focused on government spending, the national debt, and the rising cost of living in relation to Government Orders. The government defended its fiscal policies by citing Canada’s strong AAA credit rating and highlighting investments in affordability measures and essential programs, while opposition members countered that growing debt and interest payments pose risks to social services and are driving up the cost of living. Some members also questioned the government about economic stability given external factors like tariffs and expressed concern over debt warnings issued by credit rating agencies. Consequently, members of the opposition called on the Prime Minister to appear before the Finance Committee to explain his plan for spending and deficit reduction.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

39 statements

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“The Breakfast Club feeds thousands of children in the member's riding. His leader called this kind of school food work bureaucratic. I want to know if the member agrees with his leader.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am very pleased to hear our colleague talk about the importance of volunteering in his riding. Many organizations in his riding, including the Breakfast Club, provide meals to thousands of children. The problem is that his leader described the work of the Breakfast Club as bureaucratic. He has said that helping to ensure that kids go to school with full bellies is bureaucratic. I would like to know if the member agrees with his leader.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Our economy is doing well compared to other G7 countries. Canada and Germany are the only two with top credit ratings. The Conservatives want cuts, but they do not say what they would cut. Would they cut the five billion dollars for the military, or our tax break for 22 million people? I want to know what their economic plan is.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I listened very carefully to the member opposite. He made reference to Canada, France and the U.S.A. I think it is important that, when we think of the G7 countries, which include the United States, France, Germany and England, Canada places exceptionally well. We are one of only two countries, Canada and Germany, that have a AAA credit rating. The Conservatives want to see cutbacks. Would those cutbacks be to military expenditures, where we are meeting the 2% targets? That is a $5-billion expense. Are the Conservatives saying that we should not be spending that money? Are the Conservatives saying that we should not have given the tax break for 22 million Canadians? Are they saying that we should reinstate the carbon tax, in order to justify what the member opposite is saying? Where is the overall plan to develop the Canadian economy, coming from the Conservative Party?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“I reject the Conservative motion because it is full of falsehoods. Canada has the lowest net debt compared to its economy in the G7, and we will balance our operating budget a year early. The Conservatives want reckless cuts that hurt the economy. We are cutting waste in government so we can invest in business, create jobs, and build major projects.”
  • A repeated line

    “We have the lowest debt-to-GDP ratio in the G7.”

    Said 17 times by 13 members since April 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is good to be here this morning to combat the misinformation from the Conservatives. I do not know how many falsehoods the former member for Carleton can jam into one opposition day motion, but the Conservatives seem to have outdone themselves this time. No matter how many falsehoods they put together, they cannot constitute a truth, and that is what we see in this opposition day motion. I welcome the opportunity to speak to the motion. It gives me the opportunity to speak to our government’s plan for building a stronger Canadian economy while maintaining fiscal responsibility. It is an important debate at a time when events beyond our borders are having real impacts on economies and households around the world. The global economy is changing rapidly, and we all know that. Long-standing trading relationships are shifting. Uncertainty remains very high, and countries around the world are competing for investment, jobs and opportunities. In that environment, Canada must be both ambitious and disciplined. We begin from a position of fiscal strength, and we cannot understate this. It is really important that Canada, as a country, starts from one of the strongest positions, certainly in the G7. Many of our agencies internationally that look at and compare economies around the world say that Canada has one of the strongest fiscal positions in the world, including the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio in the G7. Our responsibility, I would say, is to protect that advantage while putting it to work to build a more productive, resilient and self-reliant economy. That means making deliberate choices about where government spends, where it saves, and where we invest today so that we can deliver prosperity for tomorrow. Budget 2025 marked an important shift in how we manage federal finances. Rather than allowing the cost of government to continue growing, we are shifting resources toward investments that can expand Canada’s economic capacity. In short, we have shifted from government operations to boosting productivity. We are spending less on running government so we can invest more in building Canada. Our fiscal anchors remain very clear: balancing day-to-day operating spending with revenues by year 2028-29 and maintaining a declining deficit-to-GDP ratio, and we are making progress. Despite what the Conservatives say, despite how much they talk down the Canadian economy, we are making significant progress in this country. The government is now on track to balance the operating budget in 2027-28, which is one year ahead of schedule. Let us not forget that in the spring economic update, we reported $11 billion less of a deficit than was previously projected. At the same time, we are following through on the efficiency measures set out in budget 2025. That includes the comprehensive expenditure review, which, alongside other measures identified in the budget, will deliver $60 billion in savings and revenues over the next five years. We are also reducing the size of government. We are rightsizing the public service to a more sustainable level through attrition, workforce adjustment and early retirement incentives. As that work advances, we are turning our attention to additional areas where government can operate more efficiently, including targeted horizontal reviews and efforts to rein in spending on external management and consulting services. We recognize that rising debt servicing costs reinforce the very importance of maintaining sound public finances. That is precisely why we are taking action to constrain the growth of day-to-day operating spending, to find savings across government and to maintain clear fiscal anchors. However, we will not strengthen Canada’s finances by weakening Canada’s economy. We know the opposite is actually the truth, but that method is what the Conservatives propose over and over again. The Conservatives propose to cut back and not invest strategically in the economy, which would really weaken the Canadian economy. This would not improve the public finances of the country at all. In fact, we know that if we make strategic investments, building a stronger economy will continue to strengthen Canada’s public finances over time. That is the sustainable path forward. It is disciplined spending combined with strategic investments that expand our productive capacity and support stronger economic growth. This is exactly what we are seeing in the economy today. We have seen the GDP up in the last quarter, Q2. It was up by 3.3%, exceeding expectations. It was the fastest growth in the G7. We saw GDP per capita up to 3.9%. Wages have been outpacing inflation, and we see new business investment on the rise at 8.9%, almost 9%. This is significant, especially when we look at the headwinds the country and the global economy are facing due to wars, conflicts and the oil price shocks associated with those, not to mention, obviously, the trading relationship with our southern neighbours, which has been strained and is affecting the Canadian economy. This is where our approach differs from one presented by the opposition. Fiscal discipline is necessary, but cutting for the sake of cutting is not an economic strategy. Conservatives are known for that. They would cut indiscriminately in ways that do not make sense, that do not select the areas where government operating expenses can be improved or where government operations themselves can be optimized. Our approach to spend less on operations of government means we can invest more in building Canada’s economy. The purpose of that discipline is not simply to spend less, but it is also to create the capacity or the fiscal room to invest more in the things that make Canada stronger and more productive. Those are capital investments in productive, revenue-generating assets that will return dividends to the taxpayer in the future. Yes, it will take time to grow the economy and see those investments realize themselves in the Canadian economy, but we are seeing that progress already being made. This means making government work better, removing barriers to investment and creating the conditions for more capital to flow into the Canadian economy. One way we are doing that is through the new productivity mega deduction, which is one of the most significant changes to Canada’s business tax system in half a century. I have talked to business owners all across my riding and in my region, and let me tell the House, they love this measure. They think this measure is really sound support from the government at a time where uncertainty is really the thing they are most grappling with. This measure creates long-term certainty. It allows businesses of all sizes to immediately deduct the full cost of a much broader range of investments, giving them a powerful incentive to build, expand and create good jobs in Canadian communities. This includes investments in everything from fibre optic networks, software, research and development, to mines, pipelines, railways, bridges and roads. We are also making immediate expensing permanent. This is significant, because we know that when those policy signals from the government change, they can really disrupt investment flows and disrupt industries, because they are planning ahead for many years to come. Their capital investment plans are things that are very sensitive to those swings and changes. Giving them long-term certainty is the number one thing we hear from the industries and the business community across Canada. I have done two pre-budget consultations over two summers now, and one of the themes that comes out of those conversations every single time is how businesses need long-term certainty, how capital needs long-term certainty in order to flow. This is how they make better management and investment decisions, and they need those clear and crisp policy signals that give them long-term certainty. This is exactly what we are doing with this measure. We have made immediate expensing permanent. This measure will increase the share of assets eligible for immediate expensing from roughly 15% to more than 65% of capital assets, while lowering the marginal effective tax rate on new business investment from roughly 13% to 6.4%. We are cutting it in half. This makes Canada the most tax-competitive advanced economy in the world. It is significantly lower than the United States. It is 10% lower than the United States, and it is one-third of the OECD average. This is significant in terms of incentivizing new business investment into Canada. Creating the conditions for investment is only one part of the equation. We also need to get projects built and built faster. That is exactly why the government stood up the Major Projects Office, to advance projects of national interest designed to connect our economy, diversify Canadian industries and trade, and create high-paying careers. Since September 2025, 18 projects and 10 transformative strategies have been referred to the Major Projects Office, representing more than $126 billion of investment in Canada’s economy. These are investments with the potential to transform Canada’s economy, investments in critical minerals that the world needs, energy infrastructure that can help Canadian resources reach new markets, transportation infrastructure that can help move Canadian products faster and more efficiently across Canada into those global markets, and major projects that can create good jobs, strengthen our economic security and unlock new opportunities across the country. I am particularly proud of the Darlington new nuclear project, just next door to my riding. It is significant, as it is the first deployment of small modular reactors as a major project. It got $2 billion of investment from the Canada Growth Fund, a fund that our government set up and capitalized with $15 billion a few years back. That Darlington new nuclear site is creating 18,000 construction jobs and 3,700 operational jobs in my region, in Durham region. That is significant employment and far outweighs the job losses that we have experienced since the trade war started with the United States. It is 10 times greater, in fact, than the job losses. Those are significant employment opportunities in my region. I am very proud of that work, of the Canada Growth Fund’s investment, the private capital that was associated with that investment and the many job opportunities, the good, high-paying careers at OPG in Durham region. This is what spending less to invest more looks like in practice: a more efficient government, a more competitive investment environment and more major projects getting built across Canada. It is not just in my riding. There are all kinds of projects right across the country, the northwest transmission line in B.C., Churchill Falls, which was announced and is a massive clean energy project, Contrecoeur in Quebec and many more. There are quite a few critical mineral projects that are really exciting to see come online. The measures we have put in place are the signs of a responsible government. It is not simply about how much we spend. It is about the investments we are making that deliver results for Canadians. Canada has everything it needs to succeed: the resources, the talent, the ambition. We now need to put them to work. That means spending less, again, on running government and creating more room for investment. It means attracting capital, getting major projects built and creating good jobs in communities across the country. Above all else, it means making choices today that will strengthen Canada’s economy for generations to come. Canadians expect their government to be careful with their money. They also expect us to have a plan for the future. Those objectives are not in conflict. They actually complement one another. We can control government spending while investing in growth. We can protect Canada’s fiscal strength while building the infrastructure our economy needs. We can attract investment and create opportunities while making Canada more resilient and more self-reliant. Those are the choices our government is making every day. That work will continue. Next week, our government will introduce budget 2026, building on the progress already under way to strengthen our economy and create many new opportunities for Canadians. We have an opportunity at this juncture to build a stronger Canada and our government is determined to seize that opportunity to make Canada the strongest economy in the G7. I think we have been very clear and very consistent with that message and are staying true to it, with our compass pointed at true north, which is to build a stronger country, create more self-reliance and to ensure that we do so in a fiscally responsible manner that creates good-paying jobs for Canadians. Canadians, above all else, want a highly productive economy. They want to see their standard of living increase over time. They want to feel like they are getting ahead. They want good incomes that outpace inflation. They want the extra income so that they can afford to feed their family, go on vacation and have a high quality of life. That is what Canadians are known for, and that is what Canada is known for, so that is exactly what our government is focused on every single day, creating that prosperous economy where Canadians can feel like they are getting ahead.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our government had to borrow money because of global crises, and that money helped our economy grow. The Conservatives would not make these investments. They would cut programs people rely on, like child care, dental care, school food, and help with groceries.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it does not surprise me that the premise of the member opposite’s question is false. What I mean by that is that our government has been responding to crisis after crisis that has hit our economy. I do not think it is news to anyone in the House that the global economy is highly integrated and that Canada is subject to the pressures that the world is facing today. We have had to borrow money to invest in the Canadian economy, but there is growth in the Canadian economy. I understand the Conservatives would not invest in that growth. They would cut all of the things that Canadians rely on. They would not invest in children. They would not invest in a groceries and essentials benefit. They would not feed kids at school. They would not invest in dental care. They would not invest in child care. The Conservatives have made it very clear that they would not make investments. They would not have a productivity mega deduction to spur business investment in this country. They would not do those things because it is as if they think the economy will grow by itself without the government making strategic investments, and we—

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“We have been a reliable trade partner with the United States, but we are also trading more with the rest of the world. We signed over 21 new trade and security deals this past year. Our economy is growing, with the highest growth rate in the G7, and business investment is up.”
  • A repeated line

    “We have signed over 20 new trade and security agreements in under a year.”

    Said 4 times by 2 members since June 15.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we have done everything we can to be a reasonable trade partner and reliable trade partner with our southern neighbour. At this point, we are pursuing diversified trade relationships all around the world. We have seen the Prime Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of International Trade and others work to help Canada and our businesses access foreign markets all around the world. We have signed over 21 new trade and security agreements in just over a year. We saw the highest level of non-U.S. trade in our history in July of this year. There are very significant increases to Canada’s trading relationships that are part of diversifying and of ensuring that we have a resilient economy. There are results in the Canadian economy. The member opposite said we are borrowing money, but we are also seeing growth. I cited in my speech we have 3.3% GDP growth, the highest in the G7. There was 3.9% GDP per capita growth in quarter two. Business investment is up almost 9%. We have seen a 22.6% increase in business investment in new machinery and equipment since we put in place our—

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“In 2008, spending money on infrastructure kept our economy strong. The Prime Minister is doing that again today, along with expanding our trade, and it is working. I want my colleague to share more proof that things are getting better.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for all of his work. In 2008, when we had the world economic recession, it was former prime minister Stephen Harper and former minister Jim Flaherty who put together a plan to infuse money into infrastructure and build to keep the Canadian economy strong, and it worked. We now see the Prime Minister taking that experience and having us build nation-building projects and infrastructure and diversify our trade. All of these things are working. Can my colleague expound a bit on the evidence we are seeing that things are moving in a better direction?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Governments should invest in infrastructure during tough economic times. Canada is now ranked the top country in the world for new infrastructure investment. Big banks and pension plans have promised almost half a trillion dollars to invest here, which will build a stronger economy.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I represent the riding that Jim Flaherty served for about a decade before he passed. He was a good finance minister, and I agree with the strategy, which is that, in hard economic times, often one of the things that governments do is to strategically invest in infrastructure. Canada is now ranked as the number one place in the world for new investment in infrastructure. We are the most attractive in the world for infrastructure investment. That is significant, and we have seen lots of new private sector investment interest in Canada from around the world. The Prime Minister’s investment summit got almost half a trillion dollars in new business investment commitments from our financial institutions here in Canada, our big banks and our pension plans. We are going to build this country up, and infrastructure is one of the ways that we can invest in a more productive Canadian economy for all Canadians.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The cost to pay our debt is going up because of interest rates, not government choices. The Conservative plan to cut spending would stop our economy from growing during tough times. Instead, we need to invest in things that bring in money. That will grow our economy, help Canadians live better, and bring in the cash to pay down the debt.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we know that debt servicing charges are rising, but that is not because of the Government of Canada. It is because of long-term bond rates that determine the interest rates the Canadian government will have to pay. We recognize that those debt servicing charges are going up, but what is the solution in that environment when Canada is facing a trade war and facing all these economic shocks? The Conservatives would dial it all back so that we would have no growth in the economy. That is not the solution. The solution is to invest strategically in an economy that becomes more productive and is able to generate revenue, which is exactly why we have launched the capital budgeting framework. We are focused on revenue-generating assets and investing strategically in the Canadian economy so we have growth and productivity gains, so Canadians have a better standard of living in the future, and eventually, as those revenues come in, so we can pay down the debt and deficit, which is what we all want to see.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Our government increased military spending to protect our country, and we plan to increase it more. We should not cut this spending. The Conservatives say they support our troops, but I doubt they would actually spend this money.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my colleague made reference to the issue of dialing back. As an example, I think of Canada’s commitment, through the leadership of our Prime Minister, to bring our Canadian Forces spending up to 2% of GDP, which I think we achieved within seven months of being in government. Now we are looking at eventually increasing it to 5% of GDP. These are important sovereignty-related issues. These are expenditures that are really important for us as a nation. We hear the Conservatives talk as if they want investment in the Canadian Forces, but at the end of the day, it is questionable whether they even support that sort of an expenditure. What are my colleague’s thoughts on that?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The previous Conservative government spent less than 1% on NATO. Our government reached the 2% target early and is investing over $80 billion in defence. The world is dangerous, and Canadians expect us to spend this money to keep our country safe. The Conservatives want to cut defence spending instead.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the question gives me the opportunity to point out that, under Conservative leadership, we were under 1% of our commitment to NATO. Under our government, we reached the 2% target way ahead of schedule, and way ahead of previous governments’ commitments, which is a good thing. My constituents in my riding want Canada to be safe and secure for the future. We know that, in today’s environment, in today’s world, which is more dangerous and divided, we need to make those investments in defence. It is unfortunate to some degree that the world is in that state, but those are investments that Canadians expect us to make. It is a shame that the Conservatives would not step up to make those investments at this time. They would claim some ideological stance on fiscal responsibility that makes no sense in today’s environment in order to cut back even further from defence investment. Our government has stood up, under our Prime Minister’s leadership, to invest over $80 billion in defence in the last budget, budget 2025. Those are important strategic investments in our national security.

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Our government has introduced measures to help with costs and create jobs. Given the global crisis, does the Bloc Québécois agree this spending is justified?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, our government has introduced a number of affordability measures. At the same time, we have a plan to build projects of national interest to create jobs. Given the ongoing global crisis, does the Bloc Québécois not think that this is justified?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Prime Minister is busy working on the economy and creating jobs. He does not need to answer every question. We have cabinet ministers and parliamentary secretaries to answer them instead.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the Prime Minister is working very hard at building a stronger, healthier economy by dealing with the many different stakeholders throughout the nation, along with the premiers and indigenous leaders, in developing export opportunities for Canada, small businesses, creating jobs and so forth. He has a cabinet. There are parliamentary secretaries. There are ample opportunities. The Prime Minister does not have to answer every question that is posed in the House of Commons or the standing committees. That is why we have a cabinet. The vast majority, more than 98%, could very easily be answered through ministers and parliamentary secretaries. It seems to me that what the member wants is for the Prime Minister to do even more work at committee stage, when in fact there is ample opportunity for the opposition to ask questions and hold the government accountable. Does the member not believe in the parliamentary system of cabinet in government, the parliamentary secretaries, and so forth?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Canada has a top credit rating, shared only with Germany in the G7. Investing our money to build the country will make our economy stronger. The Conservatives do not seem to understand that.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I brought up the issue of Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, which have given Canada a AAA credit rating, and it is important to note that. Out of the G7 countries, which include France, England, Germany and the United States, all industrialized countries, Canada has a AAA rating. The only other country that has it is Germany. By using Canada’s fiscal position to invest in building Canada, we are going to build a stronger and healthier economy. The Conservatives do not seem to understand that. Using Canada’s fiscal capabilities will make Canada a stronger and healthier country in the long run. Does the Conservative Party not understand the benefits of doing that?

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Our economy needs help right now because of U.S. tariffs and high gas prices. During the 2008 recession, the current Prime Minister worked with Stephen Harper to invest in projects that kept the economy moving. He is using that same approach today. I want the member to agree that creating jobs, finding new trading partners, and strengthening our defence are good things.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we are at a critical moment in our country’s history. We see the unjustified tariffs from the U.S., and the price of oil and gas going up, and we know that action is needed. If we look back at the last world economic recession, in 2008, it was the current Prime Minister who worked with then prime minister Stephen Harper and Jim Flaherty to invest in infrastructure and projects here at home in order to keep the economy going, and it worked. The Prime Minister is applying that experience now, and I think it is the right approach. Would the member not agree that building projects in the national interest to create jobs, protecting ourselves by diversifying our trade and bolstering our defence are all good things?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Canada has a top credit rating, tied with Germany. What would the Conservatives cut? Do they support more money for the military, the tax cut, school food programs, or help with groceries? Do they want to support programs that help Canadians?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to listen to the Conservatives talk about fiscal responsibility when Canada is tied with Germany in the G7 with a AAA credit rating. Exactly what would the Conservatives cut? Do they support, for example, the $5 billion in additional money for the Canadian Forces? Do they support the tax cut that was given to Canadians? Do they support the programs that are providing support on affordability, like feeding children in our schools or the groceries benefit program? Do the Conservatives want to support the programs that are helping Canadians?

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Our government is managing the country's money well while helping people with the cost of living. We have the lowest debt compared to the size of our economy in the G7, and we are cutting government running costs to save money. At the same time, programs like dental care, child benefits, and grocery rebates are giving real help to families in my riding right now.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to begin by saying that I will be sharing my time with the member for Québec Centre. I am pleased to have the opportunity to rise today to speak to a subject that we all agree on, the importance of improving the cost of living for Canadians. We all hear about this. I think that members on both sides of the House agree that the cost of living is a very important issue for Canadians. It is an issue that I hear about in my riding, as do my colleagues. What we do not agree on is how to go about improving the cost of living. Our government is taking action to to improve the cost of living and to make life more affordable for people in our communities. I want to talk about some of the measures that we have put in place to help people in my riding and across Canada. It must be said that we are going through a very difficult time because of the highly unstable global geopolitical climate. This has been going on for several years now. Yes, we need to take action, but all of these tensions have consequences. That is what we, in the government, are working on. In the long and medium terms, we need to improve our fiscal situation and our trade so that we are in a more comfortable position. In the short term, we are proposing measures that will provide immediate support for Canadians, measures that will give them some relief. We do not want to make these permanent expenditures. What we need to do is strengthen our economy. That is what we are working on. The government’s response to the current cost of living crisis is to expand opportunities for businesses through federal procurement and to help them take advantage of those opportunities. Major projects that will spur economic growth are a good example. We are going to buy Canadian and build Canadian. We want Canadian businesses to prosper here at home, and it is working. Many Canadian companies are winning contracts. At the same time, we need to diversify our markets. We are overly reliant on a single trading partner. As we often say, when our neighbour to the south sneezes, Canada catches a cold. We cannot continue like that. We need to diversify our markets. A tremendous amount of work has already been done over the past year. More than 20 new agreements have been signed with new partners. That will create significant wealth here at home. When we create wealth, it means our businesses are thriving, paying taxes, and providing good-paying jobs for Canadians. As a result, we are creating the right conditions for a stronger, more resilient and more prosperous economy. Another aspect I want to talk about is fiscal responsibility. One of the things our government is working on is creating additional fiscal room within government. This fiscal room allows us to invest in businesses and streamline certain government operations. Very recently, we announced that we are going to cut red tape in a wide range of areas within government. Our businesses welcome those changes because they make it easier to do business. They are also very cost-effective because they allow us to achieve the same results with fewer resources. That is one of the solutions we are putting in place. The results we are achieving is a country where the net debt-to-GDP ratio is the lowest of any G7 nation. That bears repeating, because it is a game-changer. It inspires trust in people who want to invest in Canada. It reassures them that they can keep investing and that we are heading in the right direction. Our public finances are on a solid footing, and we are on a path to long-term sustainability. Budget 2025, tabled almost a year ago to the day, set us on a very positive course. We have made other federal investments to stimulate private investment and strengthen the economy. That is what we have been able to achieve. At the same time, we reduced operating costs. The money that we freed up is allowing us to invest even more. Over the next five years, we expect to save $60 billion through operating cost reductions. Sixty billion dollars in operating expenditures saved over five years makes all the difference in the government’s ability to direct its resources toward far more productive long-term priorities, including investments. That has required a great deal of adjustment. Some of that work is still ongoing, but those adjustments had not been made since the COVID-19 pandemic.. The government had to hire a lot of people to support the wide range of programs that were rolled out at the time. We are continuing that streamlining effort and reviewing public service staffing levels. Middle management is allowing us to move more quickly in some cases while also creating additional fiscal room.. This budgetary approach ensures that we carry out horizontal, targeted and ongoing reviews. As a result, it is constantly being updated. We are reducing expenditures on external management and consulting services while strengthening in-house capacity. We aim to balance budgetary and operating expenditures by the 2028-29 fiscal year and keep the deficit-to-GDP ratio on a downward path. We are already on track to achieve this. This balance in expenditures, originally projected for the 2027-28 fiscal year, will now be achieved a full year ahead of schedule. That progress confirms that we are on the right track. By clearly distinguishing between day-to-day operating expenses and long-term investments, we are able to stay on a positive trajectory. I would also like to highlight a number of measures that are in place and that directly support the people of my riding. In Compton—Stanstead, 14,000 families benefit from child and family benefits, receiving assistance to help cover expenses such as education, sports and other things. As a result, approximately 25,000 children receive support, and nearly $100 million is distributed in my constituency through the Canada child benefit. We also created the Canadian dental care plan. Nearly 33,000 people in my riding are benefiting from this dental care benefit. People can now go to the dentist, which has a long-term impact on overall health, and that is extremely important. Those are two examples with figures from my riding. We also doubled the GST and HST credit last summer, which became the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. We also increased it by 25%. That money is going into the pockets of the people who need it most. It gives them a little more money for all the essential items they may need. That is why I said at the beginning of my speech that we are taking action not only in the medium and long term, but also in the shorter term, with measures like this one, to put more money in families’ pockets now. Our fiscal framework allows us to choose these kinds of solutions and deliver benefits in regions like mine. We have taken other steps aimed at reducing fuel-related costs as well. We know this is a significant expense. In rural areas like mine, people travel a lot. They need a car. We are working on that. We have programs for energy-efficient home renovations. In fact, the Prime Minister visited the Eastern Townships to discuss a heat pump program. We continue to make progress on the issue of housing costs by building more homes. I believe that our government is putting in place the tools we need to help keep the cost of living for Canadians in check. We will continue to work toward that goal in the short, medium, and long term.

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“We tax people who have more money so we can help others. This is about fairness. It makes sure all children get the same opportunities and services, and we will keep doing it.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 26 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his very relevant question, and I will address its premise. What we are doing is redistributing wealth, ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity. Through taxes, we are taking more money from the pockets of those who have more financial flexibility and redistributing it. For me, it is a question of fairness and ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service. I believe this rebalancing is very important, and we will continue along this path. We truly believe that everyone should have an equal opportunity.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“Our government gave nearly $2 billion to Quebec to create 150,000 child care spaces. I want to ask my colleague what she thinks of this investment.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for giving such a clear and accurate account of everything the government is doing to help families, but I think she forgot one thing. Perhaps I just missed it. I am thinking of the record investments in child care services for families and children in Quebec. The Canadian government allocated nearly $2 billion to the Quebec government to create the equivalent of 150,000 child care spaces in Quebec alone. As a mother, as a woman, but also as someone who believes in fairness and in the importance of children achieving their full potential, what does my colleague think of that investment in child care in Quebec?

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Federal money is helping build affordable child care in Quebec, including a new centre in my riding. Federal funding also helps feed more children at school.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 22 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Québec Centre for setting the record straight. Indeed, I had not mentioned that. In fact, a wonderful child care centre in my riding is nearly complete and will soon open its doors in Sainte-Catherine-de-Hatley, in a truly beautiful setting. Significant federal funding is flowing to Quebec to support affordable child care services, and we are continuing along that path. My colleague also gives me an opportunity to speak about Canada’s national school food program. He knows that I have close ties to agriculture, and that is another area where we are making a difference. I believe that each child deserves to attend school on a full stomach. Our program truly supports what has already been put in place in Quebec, helping provide meals to even more children.

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Our accounting separates day-to-day spending from long-term investments. This lets us cut daily costs and put that money into projects that grow the economy.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 36 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 29 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for bringing us back to the speech by our colleague from Mirabel. I always find the member for Mirabel very creative in his speeches. His references always make me smile, but we certainly do not always agree on certain matters, including the way we do accounting. Quite frankly, what we have managed to do is separate operating expenditures from capital expenditures to get a clear picture of our operating costs, reduce them as much as possible and free up those funds to invest in productive initiatives that will strengthen the Canadian economy. If that is what some call creativity, then I would call it very constructive creativity, because the results are positive.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 156

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 105 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Housing 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 8 statements
  10. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Government Appointments 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Marine Transportation 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Business of Supply 41 statements
  20. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Business of Supply 17 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Committees of the House 2 statements
  24. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 4 statements
  25. Orders of the Day Concurrence in Committee Reports 71 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements