Connected Care for Canadians Act

Bill S-5, Connected Care for Canadians Act · Second reading · now at second reading in the House Where it stands

What Bill S-5 would do

The bill would require health information technology licensed, sold, or provided as a service by vendors to be interoperable. It would also prohibit these vendors from blocking data. The published material gives no further detail.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

56 statements

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. It connects our health care system so patients have control of their medical records. It will also help doctors and stop delays, wrong diagnoses, and incorrect treatments.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I want to thank my friend and colleague for his long-time advocacy for creating this future of connected care in Canada. Absolutely, that is the goal for all of us, to provide the reality of more connected care in our communities. For far too long, and far too often, we have heard frustrations about remembering one’s medical records, having misdiagnoses, having mistreatments or delays. We all want that to improve. This bill would not only provide a path to that for clinicians and health authorities. It would also provide patients with the autonomy of having their personal data and more connected care for everybody .

Abdelhaq Sari, Bourassa

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill quickly. It requires health computer systems to share information securely and stops companies from locking patient records. This will save doctors and nurses time and help patients get better care.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am pleased to have the opportunity to speak to Bill S-5. I want to begin by having members imagine the following scene: A mother from Montreal North arrives at the emergency room with her son in the middle of the night. She knows his allergies, medications and most recent visits by heart, but the doctor on duty does not see any of that information on the patient’s record. His record exists, but it is somewhere else, in another system, not in the system of this clinic, this CLSC or this hospital. It is in a different software program or sitting on a fax machine somewhere. As a result, his mother has to repeat the information over and over again. While she is doing that, time is being wasted, and sometimes much more than just time is lost. Today, information can travel around the globe in a second, but it is still difficult for a patient’s health records to make it across the street. Bill S-5 seeks to remedy that issue. We are talking here about what I would describe as the cost of working in silos, which can be explained in numbers, and those numbers speak for themselves. Four out of five patients want to be able to access their health care records digitally online. However, only 39% are able to do that, and often they can access only some of the information. In 2023, 42% of Canadians reported gaps in the coordination of their care because of systems that do not communicate with one another. Behind those numbers are tests that had to be redone, delayed diagnoses and doctors who are searching for information instead of providing care. There are also families that carry their own health records around in an envelope or even a plastic bag—I have seen it happen—because the systems do not communicate or share data. Consider the people who provide care. Our doctors, nurses and pharmacists already work under tremendous pressure. Every hour spent filling out forms, waiting for a fax—yes, I did say a fax—or calling another clinic is an hour less spent with a patient. That is really the important thing. That is the service that we want to provide to our citizens. In a system low on resources, unnecessary paperwork is not just a detail; it is health care time wasted. I would also call this compartmentalization an “opportunity cost”. It is a collective cost. It prevents us from fully understanding which policies work and which performance indicators are best for the work at hand. It prevents us from knowing where shortfalls exist, where to look for the best impact indicator, or how to locate the best efficiency indicator, simply because the systems do not communicate; they exist in silos, with less integration. When systems operate in silos, information is not only less integrated, but the lack of interoperability prevents us from attaining the global perspective we need to measure them properly. Without seeing a situation clearly, it cannot be corrected. Without a global view, improvement is impossible. What cannot be measured is difficult to quantify or even to improve. Of course, inequalities still remain. Bill S‑5 does two simple but essential things. First, it requires interoperability. Health information technology vendors will need to ensure that the systems they sell, license or supply as a service can talk to each other and communicate according to common Canada-wide standards, including information security standards. Second, it prohibits data blocking. A vendor will no longer be able to lock a patient’s information to keep its clients captive. Health data belongs to a patient’s continuum of care, not to a vendor’s business model. Let us consider a simple example. When people switch phone providers, they get to keep their phone number. No one would consider that revolutionary today. It is taken for granted. It is simply the way things work. Why, then, should we accept that a person’s medical history remains trapped in a particular software platform or IT solution? If we demand number portability for our phone service, then we certainly can, and should, demand the same for the health of our families. I have spent a good deal of my career in IT governance and in business and corporate architecture. To be honest, technology is rarely the problem. More often than not, the problem and the challenge are cultural, including the absence of common rules. People build islands and then act surprised when there are no bridges connecting them. Bill S-5 represents an obligation and an opportunity to build those bridges. Building bridges involves creating connections. However, connecting systems does not mean we want to expose our data. Some people will ask where Bill S‑5 stands on privacy. The answer is clear: It makes no amendment to any federal, provincial or territorial privacy law. The current rules on the collection, use and disclosure of data continue to apply as they always have. Only authorized users will have access to records. Bill S‑5 does not mandate the sharing of data. It allows for the secure transfer of information where such transfers are already permitted by law. To reiterate, connecting systems does not mean data will be exposed. On the contrary, data will be better protected. Experts also see data integration as a way to enhance data security. When data is distributed, or even scattered, across multiple siloed systems, redundancy can result in inaccurate information being shared without the knowledge of the individual concerned. We need to stop relying on a patchwork of systems that, in Quebec and elsewhere, are unfortunately quite outdated. The government is not trying to take control; it is proposing a partnership. I want to speak directly to my colleagues from Quebec: Health care falls under provincial and territorial jurisdiction, and this bill respects that. It acts as a safety net where similar legislative measures do not exist. Quebec already has a well-developed interoperability regime, and common standards will be clarified in consultation with the provinces and territories. We are not starting from scratch on this. Federal, provincial and territorial governments are already working together to develop a pan-Canadian interoperability road map, and Bill S‑5 does not seek to supplant that. Its purpose is to support, assist and accelerate the process. There is also a real economic benefit. Adopting common standards reduces barriers to entry and enables Canadian digital health companies to grow, innovate and compete. Greater competition can foster more modern and potentially less costly solutions for our public health systems. As for my Conservative colleagues, I know they share our commitment to improving the quality of data in order to make better-informed decisions. Bill S-5 is an essential step toward that objective. Let us be clear: The bill does not require anyone to adopt a single system, nor does it replace the tools that are already in use. It requires them to communicate and exchange information with one another. That approach is simpler, more flexible and more respectful of what each province has already built. For me, this is a matter of fairness, first and foremost. When information does not follow the patient, it is always the same people who bear the consequences: seniors who are seeing multiple specialists; families living in rural and remote communities; and newcomers, including many in my own community. For a family in a rural or remote community, an electronic prescription, a referral to a specialist sent in a matter of seconds or a remote consultation with the correct medical records to hand can save them hours of driving, days of waiting and a great deal of worry. In closing, let me go back to the mother from Montreal North who went to the emergency room in the middle of the night. Thanks to Bill S‑5, she will no longer have to be the system’s memory. The doctor will have the information they need and her son will receive safer, faster and better coordinated care. Data saves lives and so does integration. The Senate has carefully studied this bill. In the House, all the parties are saying that they want modern care. We need to ensure that we have the means to achieve our ambitions. Let us work together to pass Bill S‑5 quickly.

Abdelhaq Sari, Bourassa

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. We need to modernize medical records so they are no longer sent by fax. I share the frustration about how long this has taken, and this bill will speed things up.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 24 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for her very pertinent question. I am also very enthusiastic about this bill and am delighted to hear that she supports it. To answer her question, I would simply say that we no longer want medical records to be sent by fax. We want to modernize. We share the same objectives. As for the delays, whether they were caused by an election or by other circumstances, we share her frustration and want to see this work advance. As I said earlier, there are several provincial or territorial laws and regulations. As my colleague mentioned, Bill S-5 seeks to speed up the process. That is our government’s intention.

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“I support this bill because it connects our health care systems. Quebec already has a system like this. I want my colleague to explain how it helps his community now and how a national system will help.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, what really resonated with me is what my colleague and friend said about breaking down silos and creating the condition for connected care. That is exactly what this bill is aiming to do. My colleague mentioned that in Quebec, there is already a system in place for that, so I want to ask him to describe the benefits he is already seeing in his community and the benefits he wishes to see once we have a connected system across the country.

Abdelhaq Sari, Bourassa

Liberal
“I support this bill. It helps doctors share and read medical records quickly, instead of making patients carry confusing paperwork. This will save time and let doctors focus on caring for people.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would like to begin by thanking the parliamentary secretary for her question and for her work both in government and in her wonderful riding. The first thing I can say about Quebec is that it has already proven itself. It has done its job. Bill S‑5 takes nothing away from Quebec. As I said earlier, its purpose is to assist, support and accelerate the work. Here is an example: A mother in my riding, Bourassa, goes in with an envelope or a bag containing information that she cannot make sense of. Imagine what it must be like for a doctor to go through that information compared to looking at a file that is available directly to them. Obviously, reading it that way is not the same; the jargon is not the same. We want to make that information accessible. The goal is to save time and provide more direct services to people, to patients, because most of the time should be spent with them, and that is where the greatest impact can be made.

Abdelhaq Sari, Bourassa

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. Patient health records should belong to patients and their care, not to private companies. Sharing this data cuts down on paperwork so doctors and nurses can spend more time with patients. Some groups have concerns, but that should not stop this plan.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, what I am hearing is that we share the same objectives. That is really very important. Health data belong to the patient’s own continuum of care. They should not belong to a vendor or to anyone else. This is what we are trying to do, and it is very important that my colleagues opposite know about it. If health care professionals have less paperwork to do, then they will have more time to spend caring for their patients. That is very important. There may be criticisms from certain organizations. That is normal. It is part of our job to listen to them, but this should not in any way interfere with measures that we want to put in place. This is the solution that we have all agreed on to give everyone access to this data. This is really about integrating health data.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“I want to ask the member a question. Does she have real-life examples of how sharing health data can improve care and save lives?”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 27 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to commend our colleague for her speech. She obviously demonstrated her deep experience and knowledge of how a modern health care system should work, including in her community. It is very clear from what she has said that she really believes in the value of health data to provide better services to Canadians in her community in particular. Does she have practical experience with respect to the ways in which access to data can improve quality of care and perhaps even save lives?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Sharing health data between doctors and hospitals will save lives. I want to know if the member supports this bill enough to vote to send it to committee.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think it is important to recognize that health information technology is all about the patient. For many years, we talked about information from patients and how it contributes to the betterment of health conditions. This legislation would actually save lives. It would improve the conditions. I am wondering if the member can provide her thoughts on the principle of the legislation. I understand there are some concerns with it, but does she support the principle of the legislation to the degree that she would vote in favour of it going to committee?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Doctors, hospitals, and pharmacists all keep records, but some provinces have better health record systems than others. This bill helps patients everywhere in Canada. I want to know what the member thinks about this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, again, I am going to recognize that what we are talking about is doctors, hospitals, institutions and pharmacists, all of which have records. Some provinces are much further advanced than other provinces. I think of the province of Ontario or of Quebec compared to my home province. Having legislation of this nature is ultimately in the best interest of all patients in all regions of the country. I would like to get the member’s thoughts on that issue.

John-Paul Danko, Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas

Liberal
“This bill would help modernize Canada's health care system, where doctors still use outdated tools like fax machines. It helps medical computer systems share data, stops companies from blocking health records, and supports online care. I want to ask the member which parts of this bill would help the people in his riding the most.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this important bill would be a big step forward for the medical system throughout Canada. It seems that doctors still send faxes, which is basically the equivalent of stapling a piece of paper to the back of a dinosaur. It is kind of crazy how backward the health system can be in Canada. Among the IT interoperability, prohibiting data blocking, protecting access to health information and supporting virtual care, I wonder if there are any specific provisions in the bill that the member opposite sees as being the most helpful for the constituents in his riding.

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“Too much time is wasted on paperwork in our health system. I want to know how many hours this bill will save.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member for Edmonton Southeast mentioned in his great speech that the Canadian Medical Association estimates that some 20 million hours are spent on administrative work. I agree with the member that excessive administrative time is often wasted and should probably be spent in other ways. I am curious as to whether the member can comment on how many of those 20 million hours could potentially be reduced through Bill S-5.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“This bill will save lives and improve people's health. I want the member to talk more about how it helps people's health.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am really encouraged by a number of the words the member has put on the record. I want to pick up on the point about saving lives. The legislation would do more than just save lives. It would also improve many people’s current health conditions. Could the member expand on that point too?

Brendan Hanley, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. It makes health care systems use common data rules so doctors and patients can share medical records safely across Canada. Right now, doctors cannot easily see their patients' full records, which causes delays, medical mistakes, and burnout.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Québec Centre. I am pleased to speak today to Bill S-5, the connected care for Canadians act, and its role in supporting a more connected health system. Bill S-5 may seem rather technical, and indeed it is. However, I cannot emphasize enough how important this bill is for patients, physicians and indeed all cadres of health care professionals, for caregivers and for the people responsible for the planning and administering of our health care systems. What is the bill about? Well, Bill S-5 would advance connected care by mandating the adoption of common data standards for health information technologies used across Canada. It would also prohibit data blocking, the practice of restricting access to health information for authorized users such as providers and patients, when privacy laws would otherwise permit it. In other words, Bill S-5 will allow for the secure sharing of health information between patients and their health care professionals at the time and place that it is needed. Data that is reliable, accurate and accessible saves lives, and the standards established by this bill would help make that possible. Research shows that patients who have access to their health information are better able to participate in treatment decisions, identify potential errors and manage chronic conditions more effectively. Improved access to health information would also support the more than four million Canadians who serve as informal caregivers in Canada. Today these individuals often devote countless hours to tracking down test results, coordinating records and repeating medical histories on behalf of their loved ones, often while balancing their own work, family and responsibilities. When patients and their caregivers do not have access to their complete medical records, they finds ways to compensate. They rely on memory, keep physical records, take screen shots and repeat their medical history to every health care provider that they see. Canadians do this because the system does not do it for them. These are creative and ingenious solutions, but they are also time-consuming and stressful and they can lead to misdiagnosis, delays in care or worse. Thirteen per cent of Canadians say their care was negatively affected due to poor information sharing between providers. The consequences can be profound, even tragic. Indeed, according to a recent physician survey conducted by the Canadian Medical Association, 92% of physicians reported that disconnected health systems, such as the inability to share patient records, test results and clinical notes, affected their ability to provide care. Two-thirds of those physicians say this happens often, highlighting the extent to which the lack of interoperability shapes day-to-day clinical practice. When providers do not have access to a patient’s complete health history, they are forced to make decisions without the full clinical picture. This increases the risk of delayed care, misdiagnosis, adverse drug interactions and unsafe treatments. Bill S-5 would enable a seamless and secure exchange of patient health information to support better collaboration among health care providers. For example, a family physician could securely share a patient summary with a specialist, helping support more timely assessments and better continuity of care. The bill would also strengthen team-based primary care, where timely information sharing is foundational to the way care is delivered. Similarly, for Canadians living with complex or chronic conditions and seeing multiple providers across multiple points of care, connected systems are a necessity. This is indeed true for Yukoners, who in many cases are in touch with providers across different jurisdictions. Harms resulting from disconnected care are especially high for people travelling in Canada, whether from northern, rural and remote communities, across provincial and territorial borders for treatment, or simply for work or vacation. For example, an elderly individual became ill while visiting family in another province. Although antiviral treatment was recommended, it could not be provided, because the lab result required to confirm eligibility for treatment was trapped in the patient’s provincial digital health system. One service provider explained that, at a hospital in a border region, patients admitted from a neighbouring province are often seriously ill. However, because the provincial health systems are not connected, patients typically arrive with photocopied and incomplete medical records. When systems cannot communicate, the result can be duplicated tests, delays in care, unnecessary costs, and frustration for patients and families. Bill S-5 would help bridge these gaps by mandating the standards that enable information sharing across the health care system. Importantly, disconnected data puts health care providers in the position of having to make clinical decisions with incomplete information. Bill S-5 would help to address this by enabling health care providers to access their patients’ complete health care information in order to provide safe, high-quality care. The purpose of the bill is to improve patient safety. However, patients are not the only ones who stand to benefit. Bill S‑5 also offers significant benefits to our valued health care professionals. Interoperable health systems can help reduce administrative burden associated with charting, forms, sick notes and tracking down test results. Today, valuable time is spent manually entering data and copying information from one system to another, instead of spending time with patients. Artificial intelligence is already supporting providers by reducing repetitive administrative tasks and improving access to information, and its use will only expand. However, these tools depend on reliable and connected data systems. Bill S-5 would help establish the secure data foundation needed to support that progress. For example, studies have found that physicians spend an average of 86 minutes a day searching for patient data due to a lack of interoperability. Now, 20 million physician hours are wasted annually on unnecessary administrative tasks. This unsustainable level of administrative work can lead to burnout, fatigue and low job satisfaction. Results from the CMA’s 2025 national physician health survey showed that 46% of physicians and residents report high-level burnout. Providers also mentioned the personal distress associated with the fear of making clinical decisions based on incomplete information. This affects their mental health, self-confidence, and ability to provide safe care. Dr. Ewan Affleck, a physician who has spent most of his career in the north and is a leading Canadian expert in digital health information, likens running a health system without connected data to flying blind, which, in his own experience, has cost patients their lives. To address this crisis, we must transition to working with digital health information within systems that can connect with one another. This will ensure consistent data transfer and reduce errors, which will help health care professionals provide high-quality care and, ultimately, improve patient safety. Bill S-5 would also support the broader use of digital tools that help patients connect with their providers, including secure platforms for booking appointments, requesting prescription refills and communicating with their care team. Transformation of any system requires investment. Whatever the cost it takes, the cost of inaction is likely to be far greater than the cost to do this work. As it is, we are already paying a staggering price for disconnected health data, estimated up to $9.4 billion annually. Beyond the financial cost, the consequences I have talked about today can hardly be measured in dollars but in patient safety, quality of care and the well-being of the health care providers who support them. Bill S-5 is a technical bill but its purpose is straightforward: to connect data to prevent patient harm. Canadians turn to the health care system seeking care and relief. I would encourage my fellow members to join me in supporting the bill so that all Canadians can receive safe health care that is informed by accurate data and is accessible wherever and whenever decisions are made.

Brendan Hanley, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs

Liberal
“This bill connects health data systems while keeping our privacy rules in place. It only shares information when the law already allows it.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is really all about supporting data sovereignty and interconnectivity at the same time that we support existing privacy protection. Authorized access remains governed by applicable privacy legislation. The bill is really about making information available when it is legally permitted to be shared and not expanding access beyond existing privacy rules. It is really helping to get that balance right, which is really all about data sovereignty.

Brendan Hanley, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs

Liberal
“I support this bill. The provinces and territories will still run health care. This bill only sets shared rules so their computer systems can talk to each other, which helps health workers get the patient information they need.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question, and I acknowledge the work we have previously done together on the Standing Committee on Health. It is important to recognize that the territories and provinces remain responsible for delivering health care. Bill S-5 does not change anything. It sets common standards enabling different systems to communicate with one another. The goal is not to impose federal control, but rather to ensure that health care professionals have access to the information they need to safely care for patients.

Eric St-Pierre, Honoré-Mercier

Liberal
“I hear about health data concerns in my city riding. How would this bill affect people living in rural and remote communities in the Yukon?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have the benefit of being a member of Parliament in an urban riding, where I do hear about concerns around health data. Could the member talk a bit more about the Yukon, which represents a lot of rural and more disconnected communities? What kind of impact would Bill S-5 have for members of his community in the Yukon?

Brendan Hanley, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs

Liberal
“I want this bill to pass. Northern and remote patients often have to travel to different towns or provinces for health care. Patient care suffers when doctors cannot easily share medical records.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned throughout my speech, Bill S-5 is particularly relevant for more remote and northern rural settings, because so much of the health care depends on the interconnectivity of communities to referral centres. For example, Whitehorse hospital is the referral centre for the territory. It receives a lot of patients and a lot of calls from around the communities, but we also access care in British Columbia, in Alberta and sometimes in other jurisdictions. I cannot tell the House how many times I hear, either personally through my former career or from colleagues, about how the lack of interchangeability of data has affected patient care. I am really looking forward to the implementation of this bill and the subsequent actual interoperability of health systems.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. It requires health technology companies to share medical records safely across provinces and stops them from blocking data. Right now, doctors cannot easily share patient files, which leads to medical mistakes and worse care for Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise and speak to the House on Bill S‑5, the connected care for Canadians act, and on the collaborative approach that we intend to use to implement it. I would like to remind the House that the bill’s objective is to establish a connected health care system, in other words, a system that provides fast, easy, reliable and secure access to health information for the people who need it. To ensure fast, secure access, Bill S‑5 requires health information technology vendors to adopt technical and data-related standards and establish clear rules that prevent data blocking. By prohibiting harmful data-blocking practices, this bill will pave the way for health data networking, which offers considerable benefits for patients and professionals, not to mention its social, economic and, obviously, health benefits. Data saves lives, and it also has the power to transform our health care system. However, our current health care system remains siloed, fragmenting care and putting patients at risk. As a result, 13% of Canadians say that the quality of their care has been compromised by a lack of communication between providers, and 8% report poorer health outcomes because their care team could not access the health information they needed. This situation obviously puts patients’ lives and health at risk. This becomes even more problematic when patients need to seek care in other provinces or territories. Take, for example, patients who rely on cross-border care, such as a truck driver with a chronic illness whose work takes him across provincial borders, a student at an educational institution outside their home province or even just a person who lives in either Gatineau or Ottawa and wants to receive treatment in one province or the other. Canadians can experience real harm when their health care providers do not have timely access to the information that they need. A lack of connected data exposes patients to increased risks, including misdiagnosis, medication errors, delays in treatment and unsafe procedures. Health care providers regularly express frustration at being unable to access lab reports and results when they need them. Reliable access to this type of information is essential across the country so that health care providers are fully aware of a patient’s medical situation when making urgent and often delicate clinical decisions. This bill also supports research and innovation, which, as we know, lead to new treatments and which will obviously stimulate economic growth in a sector with a very bright future. That is why interoperability is not just about technology. It is a strategic issue that will make the health care system fairer, improve access and enhance its quality and viability. As part of our efforts to improve access to health data and the sharing and use of such data, the Canadian government is working with the provinces, territories and key stakeholders to move forward and to implement pan-Canadian interoperability. Significant progress has been made to date. The federal, provincial and territorial governments are working together, and have been for quite some time now, to implement a shared road map. Progress has already been made in Nova Scotia with the One Person One Record initiative and in New Brunswick with MyHealthNB. These collaborative efforts have improved patients’ access to their health information, among other things. However, the progress that has been made at the national level has been variable and inconsistent, and voluntary approaches have their limits. That is why it is essential to pass a law to help the provinces and territories, where appropriate, to harmonize the enforcement of standards and prevent data blocking so that everyone can benefit from health data interoperability. To fully realize the benefits of interoperability, Bill S‑5 will be implemented and operationalized through regulations that will require health information technology vendors to meet a set of data sharing standards; prevent data blocking, which is the practice of preventing authorized users like patients and health care providers from accessing health data when they need it; and establish a system of administrative monetary penalties to ensure compliance. These regulations will be developed in close co-operation with provinces, territories, indigenous partners, health care system stakeholders, vendors and patients to support a practical and co-ordinated implementation approach that takes Canadians’ needs into account and supports interoperability across the country. In developing this legislation, we looked at examples from other countries with similar approaches. The lessons learned, connections made and discussions carried out with the United States and some members of the European Union focused on the importance of adopting consistent standards and prohibiting data blocking. Based on the experience of these countries, voluntary approaches alone are insufficient to achieve widespread and effective interoperability, underscoring the need for clear legislative and regulatory requirements for these technologies and these companies. The law will also serve as a safety net in provinces and territories that do not have similar legislation in place. Provinces and territories will have ample time to harmonize their own laws with the objectives of the federal framework, if necessary and if they deem it appropriate. In closing, one important lesson to be learned from the health care system as a whole in 2026 is clear: Digital systems that are disconnected from one another pose a threat to the health and safety of all Canadians. I believe that once implemented, Bill S-5 will save lives, improve the quality of care, reduce health care costs, and, more generally, make the work of health care professionals easier across the country.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“Blocking health data harms researchers and patients. It also hurts small businesses, because they cannot get the data they need to compete with big companies. Making these systems work together will help small innovators compete.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent question. Data blocking is bad for at least two groups of partners we really need to support and invest in in our health care sector. First, it is bad for researchers who complain, including in Quebec, about data inaccessibility that prevents the development of new technology and connections across health care professionals. It is obviously very bad for patients. Second, it is bad for small businesses that would like to develop software and technologies to compete with bigger businesses. If there is no interoperability, the data controlled by bigger businesses cannot be accessed by smaller businesses, which prevents smaller businesses from competing in this area.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“We must keep health data secure, but doctors across Canada also need to be able to see it. If a doctor in another province cannot see a sick patient's medical records, it wastes time and puts the patient's life at risk.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 26 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is right to emphasize the importance of security in data sharing. His remarks were very eloquent. We also need to recognize the importance of making the data accessible across Canada. For example, I could get sick on a trip to Edmonton. If the doctor who cares for me in Edmonton is unable to access important personal data to save my life, that is a problem for me. I could be a student in Gatineau who lives in Ottawa. I could get sick in Gatineau and may have to be moved to a hospital in Ottawa to be able to access my medical data so that the doctor can treat me. That is a waste of time, and it could also put my health at risk. Connectivity to support nationwide data sharing is also very important.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 163

  1. Government Orders Connected Care for Canadians Act 115 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  3. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 5 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 3 statements
  5. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 3 statements
  7. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 17 statements
  13. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 4 statements
  16. Oral Questions Regional Economic Development 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Connected Care for Canadians Act 26 statements
  22. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 2 statements
  23. Oral Questions Finance 15 statements
  24. Government Orders The Budget 38 statements
  25. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  26. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  27. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements