Online & privacyCrime & safety
Police access to electronic data
C-22 Lawful Access Act, 2026: An Act respecting lawful access
Helps police and security agencies obtain subscriber data and electronic information from telecommunications providers during investigations.
What Bill C-22 would do
The bill would update rules across federal laws to allow peace officers and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to obtain subscriber information and transmission data from telecommunications and electronic service providers. It would create court orders and demands for service confirmation, shorten review times for production orders, and clarify powers to examine computer data or act in urgent situations. It would also create a legal framework to ensure electronic service providers can assist authorized officials in accessing data.
Official summary
Part 1 amends various Acts to modernize certain provisions respecting the timely gathering and production of data and information during an investigation. It, among other things, (a) amends the Criminal Code to, among other things, (i) facilitate access to basic information that will assist in the investigation of federal offences through confirmation of service demands given to telecommunications service providers or judicial production orders for the production of subscriber information, (ii) expedite the response to production orders by shortening the review process and clarify the ability of peace officers and public officers to receive and act on certain information that is voluntarily provided to them and to obtain and act on information that is publicly available, (iii) specify certain circumstances in which peace officers and public officers may obtain evidence, including subscriber information, in exigent circumstances, (iv) allow a justice or judge to authorize, in a warrant, a peace officer or public officer to obtain tracking data or transmission data that relates to any thing that is similar to a thing in relation to which data is authorized to be obtained under the warrant and that is unknown at the time the warrant is issued, (v) provide and clarify authorities by which computer data may be examined, and (vi) allow a justice or judge to authorize a peace officer or public officer to make a request to a foreign entity that provides telecommunications services — or that provides services by a means of telecommunication — to the public to produce transmission data or subscriber information that is in its possession or control; (b) makes a consequential amendment to the Foreign Publishers Advertising Services Act ; (c) amends the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act to allow the Minister of Justice to authorize a competent authority to make arrangements for the enforcement of a decision made by an authority of a state or entity that is empowered to compel the production of transmission data or subscriber information that is in the possession or control of a person in Canada; (d) amends the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act to, among other things, (i) facilitate access to basic information that will assist the Canadian Security Intelligence Service in the performance of its duties and functions under section 12 or 16 of that Act through confirmation of service demands given to telecommunications service providers and judicial orders against those providers, and (ii) clarify the response time for production orders; and (e) amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Cannabis Act to provide and clarify authorities by which computer data may be examined.
Part 2 enacts the Supporting Authorized Access to Information Act . That Act establishes a framework for ensuring that electronic service providers can facilitate the exercise, by authorized persons, of authorities to access information conferred under the Criminal Code or the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act . It also makes related and consequential amendments to the Intelligence Commissioner Act . Part 3 provides for the parliamentary review of Parts 1 and 2.
- Kind
- Government bill
- Sponsor
- Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety (Scarborough—Guildwood—Rouge Park)
- Introduced
- in the House of Commons
- Last activity
Where it stands
- ProposedMar 12
- Being debated
- Almost lawsince Jun 18 Exact stageAt consideration in committee in the Senate · Standing Senate Committee on National Security, Defence and Veterans Affairs · since October 22, 2026The elected House of Commons has passed it; the Senate is reviewing it.
- Law
Passed the House; now in the Senate, in committee there
-
First reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the House done
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Before the House on 4 sitting days, to
2nd reading and referral to committee - SECU: agreed to on division,
-
Committee in the House done
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Report stage in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Third reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
3rd reading: agreed to,
-
First reading in the Senate done
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on National Security, Defence and Veterans Affairs
Before the Senate on 4 sitting days, to
-
Committee in the Senate now
Standing Senate Committee on National Security, Defence and Veterans Affairs
-
Report stage in the Senate not yet
-
Third reading in the Senate not yet
-
Royal assent not yet
Exact procedural stages
-
House
- First reading in the House: done, 2026-03-12
- Second reading in the House: done, 2026-04-20
- Committee in the House: done, 2026-06-18
- Report stage in the House: done, 2026-06-18
- Third reading in the House: done, 2026-06-18
-
Senate
- First reading in the Senate: done, 2026-06-18
- Second reading in the Senate: done, 2026-10-22
- Committee in the Senate: current stage
- Report stage in the Senate: not yet reached
- Third reading in the Senate: not yet reached
-
Royal assent
- Royal assent: not yet reached
Debates in the House 4
Time allocation, closure and other motions on the bill 4
-
Government Business No. 13—Proceedings on Bill C‑22
14 members spoke
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal 1 statement 1
- Wayne Long Liberal 1 statement 1
- Cathay Wagantall Conservative C– statement 1, graded C–2 statement 23 statement 3
- Andrew Scheer Conservative 1 statement 12 statement 23 statement 3
- Elizabeth May Green 1 statement 1
- Lisa Hepfner Liberal 1 statement 1
- Todd Doherty Conservative 1 statement 1
- Greg Fergus Liberal 1 statement 1
- Warren Steinley Conservative 1 statement 1
- Andréanne Larouche Bloc Québécois 1 statement 1
- Fraser Tolmie Conservative 1 statement 1
- Kevin Waugh Conservative 1 statement 1
- Lianne Rood Conservative 1 statement 1
- Eric St-Pierre Liberal 1 statement 1
-
Government Business No. 13—Proceedings on Bill C‑22
22 members spoke
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal B– statement 1, graded B–A statement 2, graded AF statement 3, graded FB statement 4, graded BB– statement 5, graded B–A statement 6, graded AF statement 7, graded FA– statement 8, graded A–C statement 9, graded CB+ statement 10, graded B+
- Fraser Tolmie Conservative F statement 1, graded F
- Ryan Turnbull Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+B statement 2, graded B3 statement 3A– statement 4, graded A–A– statement 5, graded A–
- Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Québécois B+ statement 1, graded B+C statement 2, graded CA statement 3, graded AB– statement 4, graded B–B+ statement 5, graded B+A statement 6, graded AB statement 7, graded BA+ statement 8, graded A+
- Rhonda Kirkland Conservative A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded AA– statement 3, graded A–4 statement 4A– statement 5, graded A–A+ statement 6, graded A+A statement 7, graded A
- Michael Coteau Liberal F statement 1, graded F
- Martin Champoux Bloc Québécois 1 statement 1A statement 2, graded AA statement 3, graded A
- Elizabeth May Green C+ statement 1, graded C+A+ statement 2, graded A+A– statement 3, graded A–A+ statement 4, graded A+A– statement 5, graded A–A statement 6, graded A7 statement 7C+ statement 8, graded C+
- Jenny Kwan NDP A– statement 1, graded A–A statement 2, graded AA+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+A statement 5, graded AA statement 6, graded AA statement 7, graded A
- John Brassard Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+3 statement 3A+ statement 4, graded A+A statement 5, graded AA+ statement 6, graded A+
- Ben Carr Liberal 1 statement 1
- Ellis Ross Conservative B statement 1, graded BA+ statement 2, graded A+A statement 3, graded A
- Sima Acan Liberal A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded A
- Tako Van Popta Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Kevin Waugh Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Chak Au Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 2A statement 3, graded A4 statement 4
- Scott Anderson Conservative 1 statement 1
- Dane Lloyd Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+F statement 2, graded FA statement 3, graded AD statement 4, graded D
- Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Melissa Lantsman Conservative A statement 1, graded AA+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+B+ statement 4, graded B+5 statement 5B statement 6, graded B
- Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Caroline Desrochers Liberal 1 statement 1
-
3 members spoke
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal 1 statement 1
- Martin Champoux Bloc Québécois 1 statement 1
- Elizabeth May Green 1 statement 1
-
1 member spoke
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal 1 statement 1
Also raised in 46
Question Period, members' statements and other debates where the bill came up.