Business of Supply

The debate focused on government spending, the national debt, and the rising cost of living in relation to Government Orders. The government defended its fiscal policies by citing Canada’s strong AAA credit rating and highlighting investments in affordability measures and essential programs, while opposition members countered that growing debt and interest payments pose risks to social services and are driving up the cost of living. Some members also questioned the government about economic stability given external factors like tariffs and expressed concern over debt warnings issued by credit rating agencies. Consequently, members of the opposition called on the Prime Minister to appear before the Finance Committee to explain his plan for spending and deficit reduction.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

105 statements

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative

Linked statement

“Credit rating agencies have warned the government about its rising debt. Our debt compared to our economy will get worse over the next five years. The government needs to admit it is borrowing too much money and share a real plan to pay it back.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would encourage the member to understand how those credit ratings are issued. If the member remembers, in the last budget, there was a warning from Fitch Ratings to the federal government about the amount of debt it was incurring, because it dropped the fiscal anchor that measures debt, which is the debt-to-GDP ratio. For a rating to be maintained, the debt-to-GDP ratio must be maintained. What are we seeing? It will be getting worse over the next five years. Members from the Liberal government continuously stand up in the House and say that they will take no lessons from the Conservatives. Well, perhaps they can take a lesson from the cold, hard math, and the math is not looking good. I would encourage the member to take a sobering stand, recognize that there is a problem with the amount of borrowing the government is taking on and provide a credible plan to repay it.

Mario Beaulieu, La Pointe-de-l'Île

Bloc Québécois
“The government gave up money by dropping the digital tax on American tech giants. Those companies threaten our culture and our media. The government did this to please Donald Trump and got nothing in return. What does my colleague think about this?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the government forwent revenue by scrapping the digital services tax on the U.S. tech giants that are threatening our culture, our media and our identity. The government did this to please Mr. Trump as part of the tariff negotiations, but it got nothing in return. What does my colleague think of that?

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“Government spending is out of control. Our fastest-growing cost is interest on the debt, which is at $83 billion. Working Canadians pay for this interest. We cannot keep ignoring this debt and spending.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is, of course, important to look at the full equation when we are looking at the country’s finances. Revenues are important. We need to continue to generate revenues, but what we are seeing right now is that expenses are out of control. More importantly, the interest expense is the fastest-growing expense on the books, at $83 billion in interest. This interest has to be serviced. Ultimately, it has to be paid, and it is paid by dollars taken from hard-working Canadians. We cannot continue down this trajectory of ignoring the spending and ignoring the debt and how the debt is going to be repaid.

Amarjeet Gill, Brampton West

Conservative
“Canadians have to pay back the government's growing debt, and it hurts our children's future. Young people and seniors are already struggling to afford things. I want the member to explain how this debt and overspending hurt everyday life now and in the future.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I will take this opportunity to ask the member what it means to have more debt, deficits and interest payments. We all know that taxpayers are on the hook to pay the debt, which is amortizing their future and their kids’ future. We have seen that everyone is struggling with affordability. Youth are struggling, and seniors are looking for relief. What are the impacts of the debt and deficits on future generations and everyday life for Canadians at the present time?

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“I spent 15 years working with business loans, and debt can be very risky. The government is hiding how much debt we really have by putting it in Crown corporations. We cannot make good financial choices when we cannot see the full picture.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I was a commercial lender for 15 years. I worked with debt and loans, and there is a certain level of sustainability that has to be considered. Debt can be very risky. Right now, we have a government that is, in fact, hiding the true amount of debt. The Liberals are hiding it in Crown corporations. When we cannot see the full picture, how can good decisions be made? A business owner will tell us that they need reliable financial statements to make decisions, and we do not have that in our country’s finances.

Tamara Jansen, Cloverdale—Langley City

Conservative
“The government is hiding how much money it borrows by splitting its spending into two groups. It spends $1 billion a week just on debt interest, which takes money away from services like health care. I want the Prime Minister to come to the finance committee to explain his plan to control spending, lower interest costs, and cut taxes.”
  • Speech on a motion

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 3 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, what if I told Canadians that every single week, the federal government spends $1 billion on something that will totally shock them? That $1 billion does not put a nurse at a bedside, does not build a home for a struggling family and does not make life one bit more affordable for Canadians. That $1 billion is 1,000 times $1 million, every seven days. What are Canadians getting for all that money? It is the bill for interest alone on the national debt. The worst part is that the $1 billion a week does not pay off a single penny of the debt itself. I think most of us know what it is like to sit down at the kitchen table with a pile of bills and wonder how we are going to make everything work. Imagine a family that has been relying a little too much on their credit card just to get through the month. They are doing their best, but the balance keeps growing, and every time they make a payment, so much of it goes toward interest that they barely make a dent in what they owe. One would think the sensible thing would be to sit down together, take a good look at where the money is going and figure out what they can cut back on. Instead, someone comes up with what they think is a brilliant idea: Why not get a second credit card and divide all their spending into two categories? On the first card, they can put everyday necessities, things like groceries, prescriptions, gas for the car and monthly bills. On the second card, they can put everything that they decide is an investment in the family’s future, like replacing a roof, buying new clothes for the kids and even taking the family to the movies, because, after all, spending time together is an investment too. Here is the clever part. From now on, they will only judge how well they are managing their money by looking at the first credit card. As long as they can get that balance under control, they will tell themselves that they are finally living within their means, even while the spending on the second card keeps growing. When the bills arrive, the bank does not care what they have decided to call their purchases. It does not matter whether the money went toward groceries, a new roof or a night at the movies. They still owe every dollar that they borrowed, and they are still paying interest on it. They have not solved their debt problem. They have simply found a new way of keeping score that makes one part of their finances look better without improving the overall picture. That little story might sound ridiculous, but it is a good way to describe how the Prime Minister is presenting the federal government’s finances. He is completely ignoring accounting practices accepted worldwide and has now decided to divide government spending into two categories. On the one side are the everyday operating expenses, and on the other are things his government calls investments in Canada’s future. Just like our family with the two credit cards, the Prime Minister wants Canadians to focus on getting that first account balanced while borrowing buckets of money to pay for what is going on the second. One does not have to take my word for whether this approach is actually keeping government spending under control. Just last week, the Parliamentary Budget Officer released her latest report, and the numbers tell quite a story. Since June, the government has announced $52.6 billion in new spending and tax measures over the next five years. Of that amount, $43.8 billion, more than 80%, has been classified as capital investment, which means it does not count against the Prime Minister’s promise to balance his operating budget. Think about that for a moment. For every five dollars in new measures that the government has announced, more than four dollars has been put into the second bucket, where they do not count against the Prime Minister’s promise to balance the day-to-day budget. Let us go back to that family sitting around the kitchen table, looking at their two credit card bills and trying to figure out how they are ever going to get ahead. They have been making their payments every month, but the balances never seem to come down because so much of what they are paying is being eaten up by interest. The longer they carry that debt, the more money they lose to interest, instead of being able to spend it on things the family needs. Most Canadians understand that problem because they have either experienced it themselves or watched somebody they love struggle with it. What many Canadians may not realize is that the federal government has run up such an enormous debt that the interest alone now works out to nearly $6,000 a year for every family of four in Canada. The Parliamentary Budget Officer tells us that the interest on our national debt is now the fastest-growing expense in the federal budget. We are not talking about health care, where Canadians are already waiting months for treatment, or national defence, where our military desperately needs new equipment, or even the benefits that seniors rely on to get by. We are talking about interest payments to corporate bankers and bondholders. This year alone, the federal government is expected to spend approximately $59 billion on interest. According to the PBO projections, that annual bill is going to climb to $83 billion by 2030. We can just imagine what that means for the next generation of Canadians, who will inherit not only the debt but the cost of servicing it. Here is where I find this especially troubling. When the Prime Minister took office, he promised Canadians that he would spend less, that he would bring some discipline back to Ottawa’s finances and that Canadians could expect a different approach to managing their money. Instead, we are looking at a deficit roughly twice the size of the one left behind by Justin Trudeau, with the government continuing to borrow billions more every year. Anyone who has ever tried to get out of credit card debt knows that they cannot keep increasing the balance and expect the interest payments to somehow take care of themselves. Eventually, those payments begin to crowd out everything else in the budget, and they find themselves working harder and harder just to keep up with what they already owe. That is exactly the concern we should have about our federal finances because every dollar Ottawa spends paying interest on the debt is a dollar that is not available to hire another nurse, provide another hospital bed, improve the services Canadians depend on or leave a little more money in the pockets of hard-working Canadians. The really frustrating part is that those Canadians are already making difficult choices every single day. They are putting things back on the grocery store shelf because they cannot afford them. They are postponing repairs to their homes. They are telling their children there simply is not enough money for some of the things they used to enjoy. They understand that when money is tight, they have to make choices. Canadians are entitled to expect their government to show that same kind of discipline, which it promised. At the end of the day, it does not matter whether someone has one credit card, two credit cards or a hundred different ways of dividing up the spending. If they keep borrowing more than they can afford to repay, the interest will keep growing. Eventually, someone has to pay the bill, and in this case, that someone is the Canadian taxpayer. The Prime Minister came into office promising to spend less, but Canadians are still waiting to hear how he intends to bring down the deficit, reduce the enormous interest bill we are leaving to our children and grandchildren and give hard-working families some relief from the taxes they are paying. That is why Conservatives are calling on the Prime Minister to come before the House of Commons finance committee and explain his plan. We want to know how he intends to get government spending under control, how he plans to reduce the interest we are paying on the national debt and when Canadians can expect to see some of their hard-earned money stay in their own pockets. This week, every Liberal member of Parliament will have an opportunity to support this request. Surely, asking the Prime Minister to explain how he intends to keep his own promises should not be controversial. Canadians have been doing their part. They have been working hard, paying their taxes and making difficult decisions around their own kitchen tables. I believe they have earned the right to expect their government to be just as careful with their money as they have to be. The Prime Minister has told Canadians he knows how to manage the economy. We are simply asking him to come to the finance committee, show us the numbers and explain his plan. Canadians do not need another credit card. They need a government that knows how to pay the bill.

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Our economy needs help right now because of U.S. tariffs and high gas prices. During the 2008 recession, the current Prime Minister worked with Stephen Harper to invest in projects that kept the economy moving. He is using that same approach today. I want the member to agree that creating jobs, finding new trading partners, and strengthening our defence are good things.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Reasoning 33 of 100

    This statement drew 3 conclusions, but gave no reasons for 2 of them.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we are at a critical moment in our country’s history. We see the unjustified tariffs from the U.S., and the price of oil and gas going up, and we know that action is needed. If we look back at the last world economic recession, in 2008, it was the current Prime Minister who worked with then prime minister Stephen Harper and Jim Flaherty to invest in infrastructure and projects here at home in order to keep the economy going, and it worked. The Prime Minister is applying that experience now, and I think it is the right approach. Would the member not agree that building projects in the national interest to create jobs, protecting ourselves by diversifying our trade and bolstering our defence are all good things?

Tamara Jansen, Cloverdale—Langley City

Conservative
“Times are tough, but the government still chose to spend more than it had. The budget office found we had 37 billion dollars in extra revenue, but the government announced over 52 billion dollars in new spending. The Prime Minister should explain this choice.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, nobody disputes that tariffs and global uncertainty are hurting our economy. In fact, Prime Minister Harper balanced the budget during those difficult times. The PBO acknowledges that these are tough times, but it also tells us that since June, stronger revenues created $37 billion in additional fiscal room while the government announced $52.6 billion in new measures. That is a choice about how to use the available money, and it is entirely reasonable to ask the Prime Minister to explain it.

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“The Prime Minister shows up to question period only about 26% of the time, and our questions about the country's finances go unanswered. He needs to come to the finance committee and answer them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one of the important statistics to consider in relation to why this motion is before the House is, of course, that the Prime Minister’s attendance at question period is roughly 26% of the time, and not all questions are answered. We have very important questions for the Prime Minister around the country’s finances, questions that are not answered with the made-up definitions or the fiscal anchor that he has chosen to control spending and debt in this country. Can the member comment as to why it is important for the Prime Minister to answer these questions in the finance committee?

Tamara Jansen, Cloverdale—Langley City

Conservative
“The independent budget watchdog says the government's rules are not stopping its heavy spending. The deficit is $63 billion this year and will reach $70 billion next year, with rising interest costs. The Prime Minister needs to explain this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is very simple. The PBO has just told us that the government’s own fiscal rules have imposed limited fiscal discipline. In plain English, the government’s spending rules are doing diddly-squat to stop the wild spending spree it is on. We are looking at a $63-billion deficit this year, climbing to $70 billion next year, while interest payments continue to grow. These are not numbers coming from the opposition. They are coming from Parliament’s independent budget watchdog. Surely, that deserves an explanation from the Prime Minister.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Canada has a top credit rating, tied with Germany. What would the Conservatives cut? Do they support more money for the military, the tax cut, school food programs, or help with groceries? Do they want to support programs that help Canadians?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to listen to the Conservatives talk about fiscal responsibility when Canada is tied with Germany in the G7 with a AAA credit rating. Exactly what would the Conservatives cut? Do they support, for example, the $5 billion in additional money for the Canadian Forces? Do they support the tax cut that was given to Canadians? Do they support the programs that are providing support on affordability, like feeding children in our schools or the groceries benefit program? Do the Conservatives want to support the programs that are helping Canadians?

Tamara Jansen, Cloverdale—Langley City

Conservative
“The government is spending too much money. Canada spends more as a share of its economy than most peer countries, and our debt costs keep rising. I want the Prime Minister to tell us if he has a real plan to get borrowing under control.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 37 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague loves to talk about our amazing credit rating, but Canada is already spending more as a share of our economy than the G20 median, and the OECD tells us government spending has increased significantly since before the pandemic. Even Russia, which is in the middle of a war with Ukraine, is spending less than us. Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Budget Officer is projecting continuing federal deficits and rising debt interest costs. Canadians deserve to hear whether the Prime Minister has a credible plan to bring federal borrowing under control.

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Our government is managing the country's money well while helping people with the cost of living. We have the lowest debt compared to the size of our economy in the G7, and we are cutting government running costs to save money. At the same time, programs like dental care, child benefits, and grocery rebates are giving real help to families in my riding right now.”
  • Speech on a motion

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 7 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to begin by saying that I will be sharing my time with the member for Québec Centre. I am pleased to have the opportunity to rise today to speak to a subject that we all agree on, the importance of improving the cost of living for Canadians. We all hear about this. I think that members on both sides of the House agree that the cost of living is a very important issue for Canadians. It is an issue that I hear about in my riding, as do my colleagues. What we do not agree on is how to go about improving the cost of living. Our government is taking action to to improve the cost of living and to make life more affordable for people in our communities. I want to talk about some of the measures that we have put in place to help people in my riding and across Canada. It must be said that we are going through a very difficult time because of the highly unstable global geopolitical climate. This has been going on for several years now. Yes, we need to take action, but all of these tensions have consequences. That is what we, in the government, are working on. In the long and medium terms, we need to improve our fiscal situation and our trade so that we are in a more comfortable position. In the short term, we are proposing measures that will provide immediate support for Canadians, measures that will give them some relief. We do not want to make these permanent expenditures. What we need to do is strengthen our economy. That is what we are working on. The government’s response to the current cost of living crisis is to expand opportunities for businesses through federal procurement and to help them take advantage of those opportunities. Major projects that will spur economic growth are a good example. We are going to buy Canadian and build Canadian. We want Canadian businesses to prosper here at home, and it is working. Many Canadian companies are winning contracts. At the same time, we need to diversify our markets. We are overly reliant on a single trading partner. As we often say, when our neighbour to the south sneezes, Canada catches a cold. We cannot continue like that. We need to diversify our markets. A tremendous amount of work has already been done over the past year. More than 20 new agreements have been signed with new partners. That will create significant wealth here at home. When we create wealth, it means our businesses are thriving, paying taxes, and providing good-paying jobs for Canadians. As a result, we are creating the right conditions for a stronger, more resilient and more prosperous economy. Another aspect I want to talk about is fiscal responsibility. One of the things our government is working on is creating additional fiscal room within government. This fiscal room allows us to invest in businesses and streamline certain government operations. Very recently, we announced that we are going to cut red tape in a wide range of areas within government. Our businesses welcome those changes because they make it easier to do business. They are also very cost-effective because they allow us to achieve the same results with fewer resources. That is one of the solutions we are putting in place. The results we are achieving is a country where the net debt-to-GDP ratio is the lowest of any G7 nation. That bears repeating, because it is a game-changer. It inspires trust in people who want to invest in Canada. It reassures them that they can keep investing and that we are heading in the right direction. Our public finances are on a solid footing, and we are on a path to long-term sustainability. Budget 2025, tabled almost a year ago to the day, set us on a very positive course. We have made other federal investments to stimulate private investment and strengthen the economy. That is what we have been able to achieve. At the same time, we reduced operating costs. The money that we freed up is allowing us to invest even more. Over the next five years, we expect to save $60 billion through operating cost reductions. Sixty billion dollars in operating expenditures saved over five years makes all the difference in the government’s ability to direct its resources toward far more productive long-term priorities, including investments. That has required a great deal of adjustment. Some of that work is still ongoing, but those adjustments had not been made since the COVID-19 pandemic.. The government had to hire a lot of people to support the wide range of programs that were rolled out at the time. We are continuing that streamlining effort and reviewing public service staffing levels. Middle management is allowing us to move more quickly in some cases while also creating additional fiscal room.. This budgetary approach ensures that we carry out horizontal, targeted and ongoing reviews. As a result, it is constantly being updated. We are reducing expenditures on external management and consulting services while strengthening in-house capacity. We aim to balance budgetary and operating expenditures by the 2028-29 fiscal year and keep the deficit-to-GDP ratio on a downward path. We are already on track to achieve this. This balance in expenditures, originally projected for the 2027-28 fiscal year, will now be achieved a full year ahead of schedule. That progress confirms that we are on the right track. By clearly distinguishing between day-to-day operating expenses and long-term investments, we are able to stay on a positive trajectory. I would also like to highlight a number of measures that are in place and that directly support the people of my riding. In Compton—Stanstead, 14,000 families benefit from child and family benefits, receiving assistance to help cover expenses such as education, sports and other things. As a result, approximately 25,000 children receive support, and nearly $100 million is distributed in my constituency through the Canada child benefit. We also created the Canadian dental care plan. Nearly 33,000 people in my riding are benefiting from this dental care benefit. People can now go to the dentist, which has a long-term impact on overall health, and that is extremely important. Those are two examples with figures from my riding. We also doubled the GST and HST credit last summer, which became the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. We also increased it by 25%. That money is going into the pockets of the people who need it most. It gives them a little more money for all the essential items they may need. That is why I said at the beginning of my speech that we are taking action not only in the medium and long term, but also in the shorter term, with measures like this one, to put more money in families’ pockets now. Our fiscal framework allows us to choose these kinds of solutions and deliver benefits in regions like mine. We have taken other steps aimed at reducing fuel-related costs as well. We know this is a significant expense. In rural areas like mine, people travel a lot. They need a car. We are working on that. We have programs for energy-efficient home renovations. In fact, the Prime Minister visited the Eastern Townships to discuss a heat pump program. We continue to make progress on the issue of housing costs by building more homes. I believe that our government is putting in place the tools we need to help keep the cost of living for Canadians in check. We will continue to work toward that goal in the short, medium, and long term.

Jim Bélanger, Sudbury East—Manitoulin—Nickel Belt

Conservative
“Life costs too much right now. The government taxes people, gives some money back in programs, and grows the debt. I want to know if the government will fix the real causes of high prices instead of just treating the symptoms.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we all know that we are facing a cost of living crisis, and we acknowledge that. That said, it seems to me that the government is taking money out of people’s pockets and then putting some of it back through subsidies and other programs, all while the debt continues to grow. Does the government intend to examine and address the root causes of the rising cost of living, rather than simply treating the symptoms?

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“We tax people who have more money so we can help others. This is about fairness. It makes sure all children get the same opportunities and services, and we will keep doing it.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 26 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his very relevant question, and I will address its premise. What we are doing is redistributing wealth, ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity. Through taxes, we are taking more money from the pockets of those who have more financial flexibility and redistributing it. For me, it is a question of fairness and ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service. I believe this rebalancing is very important, and we will continue along this path. We truly believe that everyone should have an equal opportunity.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“Our government gave nearly $2 billion to Quebec to create 150,000 child care spaces. I want to ask my colleague what she thinks of this investment.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for giving such a clear and accurate account of everything the government is doing to help families, but I think she forgot one thing. Perhaps I just missed it. I am thinking of the record investments in child care services for families and children in Quebec. The Canadian government allocated nearly $2 billion to the Quebec government to create the equivalent of 150,000 child care spaces in Quebec alone. As a mother, as a woman, but also as someone who believes in fairness and in the importance of children achieving their full potential, what does my colleague think of that investment in child care in Quebec?

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Federal money is helping build affordable child care in Quebec, including a new centre in my riding. Federal funding also helps feed more children at school.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 22 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Québec Centre for setting the record straight. Indeed, I had not mentioned that. In fact, a wonderful child care centre in my riding is nearly complete and will soon open its doors in Sainte-Catherine-de-Hatley, in a truly beautiful setting. Significant federal funding is flowing to Quebec to support affordable child care services, and we are continuing along that path. My colleague also gives me an opportunity to speak about Canada’s national school food program. He knows that I have close ties to agriculture, and that is another area where we are making a difference. I believe that each child deserves to attend school on a full stomach. Our program truly supports what has already been put in place in Quebec, helping provide meals to even more children.

Marilène Gill, Côte-Nord—Kawawachikamach—Nitassinan

Bloc Québécois
“The government uses tricky accounting to make its spending look lower than it is, and even experts could not explain it. Now paying interest on the debt costs more than health care transfers to Quebec and the provinces. I want my colleague to tell us what he thinks of this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have been talking about investments versus spending. My colleague, the member for Mirabel, spoke about the government’s creative accounting. I know that members listened closely to his remarks earlier. I would like to know what my colleague thinks of an approach that makes government spending appear lower than it actually is. As my colleague pointed out, even experts were unable to shed light on this accounting when the matter was studied in committee. I think what we are talking about here today is the government’s massive spending, which has resulted in debt servicing costs now exceeding health transfers to Quebec and the provinces.

Marianne Dandurand, Compton—Stanstead

Liberal
“Our accounting separates day-to-day spending from long-term investments. This lets us cut daily costs and put that money into projects that grow the economy.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 36 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 29 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for bringing us back to the speech by our colleague from Mirabel. I always find the member for Mirabel very creative in his speeches. His references always make me smile, but we certainly do not always agree on certain matters, including the way we do accounting. Quite frankly, what we have managed to do is separate operating expenditures from capital expenditures to get a clear picture of our operating costs, reduce them as much as possible and free up those funds to invest in productive initiatives that will strengthen the Canadian economy. If that is what some call creativity, then I would call it very constructive creativity, because the results are positive.

Jean-Yves Duclos, Québec Centre

Liberal
“Canada's finances are strong despite world uncertainty. We have the lowest net debt to GDP ratio in the G7 and top credit ratings. We are balancing our day-to-day spending a year early so we can invest in building the economy. We are also giving big tax breaks to businesses to invest here. I want the House to support our economic plan.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, thank you for giving me an opportunity to say a few words about the motion. I think that most members of the House, if not all, are aware that we are living in a world that is changing quickly and in unpredictable ways. In the face of economic uncertainty and international trade tensions, Canada must focus on what it can control. That means strengthening our economy here at home, diversifying our trade relationships abroad and making strategic investments to build an even stronger, more independent and fairer economy for everyone. The cornerstone of this approach is having a sound financial position. Indeed, a sound financial position gives us the means to act. It allows us to protect Canadians when circumstances require it. It also gives us the tools to respond to economic shocks and, more importantly, to invest in the future. Canada is well positioned to weather this period of uncertainty. I am not alone in saying so. According to the latest projections from the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, Canada is expected to have the second-lowest deficit in the G7 this year as a share of its economy. The IMF also forecasts a continued decline in that deficit over the coming years. It is expected to fall from 2.5% of GDP in 2026 to 2.4% in 2027, before falling to 1.7% by 2031. We also have the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio of any G7 country. Canada is one of only two G7 countries, alongside Germany, to hold a AAA credit rating from all major credit rating agencies. This top-tier rating reflects the confidence that global investors have in Canada’s public finances. It is a significant strength, helping to keep borrowing costs as low as possible while ensuring that we have the capacity to act. Furthermore, we are the world’s most connected economy, with free trade agreements covering countries that represent 1.5 billion consumers. We also offer the most competitive tax system in the G7 for new business investment. Last month, Canada hosted the very first Canada investment summit. The goal was clear: to bring together some of the world’s largest investors and show them what Canada has to offer. The summit laid the groundwork for substantial new investments and strategic partnerships, with nearly $500 billion in new funding and investment commitments in Canada. It is important to attract investors to Canada, but that is not enough. We also need to create the conditions that make them want to invest here. That is why our government announced the new productivity mega deduction. We made that announcement recently, at the investment summit in fact. The productivity mega deduction is a major tax investment. This measure makes Canada the most competitive G7 country for new business investment. It provides businesses with immediate expensing for a broad-based range of depreciable property on a permanent basis. It increases the proportion of assets eligible for immediate expensing from about 15% to over 65%. It will support Canadian businesses of all sizes, small, medium and large, by encouraging them to invest more in their workforce, thereby stimulating long-term growth in Canada. Canada has a financial advantage, and we are determined to protect it. Budget 2025 also marked a shift in the government’s strategy for managing public finances. As the Prime Minister announced recently, the government is on track to balance operating expenditures and revenues in 2027-28, one year earlier than expected. By reducing the government’s operating expenditures, we can invest more in the assets and infrastructure that strengthen our economy. In other words, we are devoting fewer resources to the day-to-day operations of government, but allocating more on building Canada’s economic capacity for decades to come. We must protect that capacity, which is why the government has set clear objectives to guide its budget decisions. First, we must balance operating expenditures with revenues. Second, we must keep the deficit on a downward track relative to the size of our economy. That is how we will preserve Canada’s fiscal advantage in the years ahead. In closing, we have one of the strongest fiscal positions in the G7, the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio in the G7 and a AAA credit rating. Our responsibility is twofold: to preserve those strengths and put them to work in support of growth and prosperity for Canadians. That means investing in infrastructure and major projects that strengthen our economy. That means attracting more private capital to Canada and encouraging investment. That means giving our businesses the means to invest and grow. That means diversifying our international trade and helping our businesses access new markets. That means maintaining careful management of our public finances. That is exactly what we are doing and what we will continue to do.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 156

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 105 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Housing 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 8 statements
  10. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Government Appointments 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Marine Transportation 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Business of Supply 41 statements
  20. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Business of Supply 17 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Committees of the House 2 statements
  24. Private Members' Business Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) 4 statements
  25. Orders of the Day Concurrence in Committee Reports 71 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements