Criminal Code and victim rights changes
C-16 Protecting Victims Act: An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures)
Creates a criminal offence for coercive control against an intimate partner and expands rights and protections for crime victims.
What the law does
The law amends the Criminal Code to create a new offence for coercive or controlling conduct toward an intimate partner. It classifies intimate partner murders linked to controlling conduct or sexual violence as first-degree murder, and expands the offence of sharing intimate images without consent to cover realistic depictions. The law also gives victims automatic access to information about their cases, bars people suspected of domestic violence or stalking from holding firearms licences, and makes other changes across the justice system.
Official summary
This enactment amends various Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters. It amends the Criminal Code to, among other things, (a) create a new offence that prohibits engaging in a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct toward an intimate partner; (b) provide that, in the following circumstances, murder — known as femicide when committed against a female person — is murder in the first degree: (i) the murder is committed against an intimate partner in the context of a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct, (ii) the murder is committed in the context of sexual violence, (iii) the murder is committed in the context of human trafficking, or (iv) the murder is motivated by hate; (c) provide that, if an offender commits manslaughter in those circumstances, the court must consider whether to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on the offender and, if that sentence is imposed, an adult offender is ineligible for parole for 10 to 25 years; (d) remove from the criminal harassment offence the requirement to prove that the victim subjectively feared for their safety and replace it with a requirement to prove that the harassing conduct could reasonably be expected to cause the victim to believe that someone’s safety is threatened; (e) amend the offence of non-consensual distribution of an intimate image to include, among such images, a visual representation showing an identifiable person depicted as nude, as exposing their sexual organs or as engaged in explicit sexual activity, if the depiction is likely to be mistaken for a visual recording of that person; (f) amend certain existing child sexual offences to include prohibiting a person from inviting a child to expose their own sexual organs for a sexual purpose; (g) criminalize the distribution of visual representations of bestiality; (h) create a new offence relating to the recruitment of a person under 18 years of age to be a party to an offence; (i) provide that victims of certain offences, such as offences in the commission of which violence was used, threatened or attempted against an intimate partner, are entitled to testimonial aids; (j) permit courts to order that an offender serve a period of imprisonment below a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, but only if the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment would amount to cruel and unusual punishment for that particular offender; (k) create a new Part establishing a framework for applying alternative measures and restorative justice processes in appropriate cases; (l) create a new Part in respect of unreasonable delay that requires a court to consider specific factors in relation to case complexity, directs a court to exclude time periods in respect of specific applications and requires that a stay of proceedings be ordered only if a court is satisfied, taking into account a list of factors, that no other remedy would be appropriate and just; (m) streamline and strengthen the procedural rules in sexual offence trials that govern when evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity can be adduced and when certain private records, including therapeutic records, can be produced or adduced; and (n) allow the possibility of using affidavit evidence for certain cases involving identity theft and identity fraud.
The enactment also makes consequential amendments to other Acts. The enactment also amends the Youth Criminal Justice Act to, among other things, (a) ensure that it better reflects the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights with respect to the rights and interests of victims; (b) modernize the principle requiring consideration of the needs of young persons, including by requiring particular attention to those of Aboriginal and Black young persons; and (c) allow youth justice courts to order that a young person enter into a recognizance if there is a reasonable fear that the young person will commit a child sexual offence. The enactment also amends the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights to (a) modify the preamble to affirm the importance of victim-centred and trauma-informed approaches; (b) provide victims with the right to be treated with respect, courtesy, compassion and fairness; (c) enable victims to receive information without being required to make a request; (d) provide that victims have the right to receive information about their rights under that Act and the protection measures that are available to them; (e) broaden the information that victims have the right to receive about available restorative justice processes; and (f) clarify the right of victims to present a victim impact statement at sentencing and a victim statement for consideration when decisions regarding parole or corrections are made about the offender who harmed them. The enactment also amends the National Defence Act to, among other things, (a) provide that victims of certain offences, such as offences in the commission of which violence was used, threatened or attempted against an intimate partner, are entitled to testimonial aids; (b) create a new Division in respect of unreasonable delay that requires a court martial to consider specific factors in relation to case complexity, directs a court martial to exclude time periods in respect of specific applications and requires that a stay of proceedings be ordered only if a court martial is satisfied, taking into account a list of factors, that no other remedy would be appropriate and just; (c) streamline and strengthen the procedural rules to align with the Criminal Code procedural rules in sexual offence trials that govern when evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity can be adduced and when certain private records, including therapeutic records, can be produced or adduced; (d) provide victims with the right to be treated with respect, courtesy, compassion and fairness; (e) provide that victims have the right to receive information about their rights under the Division of the National Defence Act entitled “Declaration of Victims Rights” and information about the protection measures that are available to them; and (f) enable victims to receive information from authorities in the military justice system without being required to make a request. The enactment also amends An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child sexual abuse and exploitation material by persons who provide an Internet service to, among other things, (a) clarify the types of Internet services covered by that Act; (b) require that transmission data be provided with the mandatory notification in cases where the material is manifestly child sexual abuse and exploitation material; (c) extend the period of preservation of data related to an offence; and (d) extend the limitation period for the prosecution of an offence under that Act. The enactment also amends the Firearms Act to clarify that an individual whose firearms licence or registration certificate has been revoked is required to deliver their firearm to a peace officer, firearms officer or chief firearms officer and to provide that an individual is not eligible to hold a licence under that Act if the chief firearms officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that the individual may have engaged in an act of domestic violence or stalking. The enactment also amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to, among other things, enhance the disclosure of information to victims and other components of the criminal justice system and provide for the submission of victim statements in certain instances. Finally, the enactment also amends the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act to facilitate legal assistance between Canada and supranational bodies with responsibility for criminal investigations or prosecutions.
- Kind
- Government bill
- Sponsor
- Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice (Central Nova)
- Introduced
- in the House of Commons
- Last activity
Where it stands
- ProposedDec 9, 2025
- Being debated
- Almost law
- LawJun 18
Became law June 18
-
First reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the House done
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
Before the House on 3 sitting days, to
2nd reading and referral to committee - JUST: agreed to on division,
-
Committee in the House done
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Report stage in the House done
Before the House on 3 sitting days, to · 4 debates here
-
Third reading in the House done
Before the House on 3 sitting days, to · 3 debates here
3rd reading: agreed to, 192–133 (division 153),
-
Senate pre-study (Senate) done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
-
First reading in the Senate done
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Committee in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Third reading in the Senate done
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Royal assent done
Exact procedural stages
-
House
- First reading in the House: done, 2025-12-09
- Second reading in the House: done, 2026-02-02
- Committee in the House: done, 2026-05-25
- Report stage in the House: done, 2026-06-08
- Third reading in the House: done, 2026-06-11
-
Senate
- First reading in the Senate: done, 2026-06-11
- Second reading in the Senate: done, 2026-06-15
- Committee in the Senate: done, 2026-06-17
- Third reading in the Senate: done, 2026-06-18
-
Royal assent
- Royal assent: done, 2026-06-18
Debates in the House 9
Members who spoke: Conservative 30 Liberal 28 Bloc Québécois 9 NDP 3 Green 1
Report stage 4
-
Government Orders: Motions in Amendment
16 members spoke
- Leah Gazan NDP A statement 1, graded AA+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A statement 1, graded AB statement 2, graded BA+ statement 3, graded A+A statement 4, graded A
- Andréanne Larouche Bloc Québécois B– statement 1, graded B–A+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+A statement 4, graded AB statement 5, graded BB statement 6, graded BA+ statement 7, graded A+
- Jenny Kwan NDP A– statement 1, graded A–
- Ruby Sahota Liberal A statement 1, graded AB– statement 2, graded B–3 statement 3A statement 4, graded AB+ statement 5, graded B+6 statement 6
- Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+
- Ellis Ross Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- Larry Brock Conservative A statement 1, graded AF statement 2, graded FA+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+A– statement 5, graded A–
- Michael Cooper Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+B statement 3, graded BC+ statement 4, graded C+A+ statement 5, graded A+B statement 6, graded B
- Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Québécois B statement 1, graded B
- Brad Vis Conservative 1 statement 1A statement 2, graded A
- Judy A. Sgro Liberal A statement 1, graded AB– statement 2, graded B–A– statement 3, graded A–A– statement 4, graded A–A– statement 5, graded A–
- Lisa Hepfner Liberal 1 statement 1
- Tony Baldinelli Conservative B– statement 1, graded B–
- Blaine Calkins Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Andrew Lawton Conservative A statement 1, graded A
-
9 members spoke
- Kristina Tesser Derksen Liberal A statement 1, graded AB– statement 2, graded B–A– statement 3, graded A–A statement 4, graded A
- Frank Caputo Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Elizabeth May Green A statement 1, graded A
- Louis Villeneuve Liberal 1 statement 1
- Roman Baber Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+C– statement 2, graded C–A+ statement 3, graded A+D– statement 4, graded D–5 statement 5
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal D statement 1, graded DF statement 2, graded FA+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+A statement 5, graded AA statement 6, graded A
- Andrew Lawton Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+A statement 2, graded A
- Rhéal Éloi Fortin Bloc Québécois B– statement 1, graded B–A statement 2, graded AA+ statement 3, graded A+B+ statement 4, graded B+B+ statement 5, graded B+
- Amarjeet Gill Conservative A statement 1, graded AB statement 2, graded B
-
10 members spoke
- Rechie Valdez Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+C+ statement 2, graded C+3 statement 3A statement 4, graded A
- Raquel Dancho Conservative A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded A
- Sébastien Lemire Bloc Québécois A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded AA+ statement 3, graded A+
- Ruby Sahota Liberal A statement 1, graded AA– statement 2, graded A–
- Tamara Jansen Conservative A statement 1, graded AA+ statement 2, graded A+B statement 3, graded BD+ statement 4, graded D+B statement 5, graded B
- David Bexte Conservative 1 statement 1
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal 1 statement 1A+ statement 2, graded A+
- Chi Nguyen Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+F statement 2, graded FA statement 3, graded AB statement 4, graded B5 statement 5
- Roman Baber Conservative 1 statement 1
- Doly Begum Liberal A statement 1, graded A
-
Government Orders: Protecting Victims Act
16 members spoke
- Ruby Sahota Liberal C+ statement 1, graded C+A+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+
- Raquel Dancho Conservative A statement 1, graded AB statement 2, graded BA statement 3, graded A
- Martin Champoux Bloc Québécois A statement 1, graded A2 statement 23 statement 3C+ statement 4, graded C+A statement 5, graded AA statement 6, graded A
- Roman Baber Conservative 1 statement 12 statement 2A statement 3, graded A
- Adam van Koeverden Liberal A– statement 1, graded A–B statement 2, graded BA statement 3, graded AD statement 4, graded D
- Cathay Wagantall Conservative A statement 1, graded AA+ statement 2, graded A+D+ statement 3, graded D+A+ statement 4, graded A+5 statement 5
- Sébastien Lemire Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 2A– statement 3, graded A–
- Scott Anderson Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- Dominique O'Rourke Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+B statement 2, graded BA statement 3, graded AB+ statement 4, graded B+
- Ellis Ross Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+A statement 2, graded AA– statement 3, graded A–B statement 4, graded BA+ statement 5, graded A+
- Patricia Lattanzio Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+B– statement 2, graded B–A+ statement 3, graded A+B statement 4, graded B
- Anju Dhillon Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 23 statement 3
- Shannon Miedema Liberal A statement 1, graded AB statement 2, graded BF statement 3, graded FB statement 4, graded B
- Gord Johns NDP B– statement 1, graded B–
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A statement 1, graded A2 statement 2
- Blaine Calkins Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
Third reading 3
-
29 members spoke
- Anthony Housefather Liberal 1 statement 1A statement 2, graded AA+ statement 3, graded A+A statement 4, graded AA+ statement 5, graded A+A statement 6, graded A7 statement 7
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A statement 1, graded AC statement 2, graded CA– statement 3, graded A–4 statement 4F statement 5, graded FD statement 6, graded DC+ statement 7, graded C+F statement 8, graded FB statement 9, graded BB+ statement 10, graded B+C– statement 11, graded C–B statement 12, graded BD statement 13, graded DD+ statement 14, graded D+B statement 15, graded B
- Kelly DeRidder Conservative 1 statement 1A+ statement 2, graded A+A statement 3, graded AA+ statement 4, graded A+B– statement 5, graded B–
- Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 2A– statement 3, graded A–A+ statement 4, graded A+C statement 5, graded CF statement 6, graded F7 statement 7C– statement 8, graded C–B+ statement 9, graded B+
- Bardish Chagger Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Giovanna Mingarelli Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 2A statement 3, graded A4 statement 45 statement 5
- Stephanie Kusie Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+2 statement 2F statement 3, graded F
- Abdelhaq Sari Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Jeff Kibble Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+A+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+
- Larry Brock Conservative 1 statement 1A statement 2, graded AA+ statement 3, graded A+B statement 4, graded BA+ statement 5, graded A+6 statement 6
- Gurbux Saini Liberal A– statement 1, graded A–
- Andréanne Larouche Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+C– statement 2, graded C–A+ statement 3, graded A+B+ statement 4, graded B+B– statement 5, graded B–A– statement 6, graded A–A+ statement 7, graded A+A+ statement 8, graded A+B+ statement 9, graded B+A statement 10, graded AA+ statement 11, graded A+A+ statement 12, graded A+
- Gabriel Hardy Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+A– statement 2, graded A–C– statement 3, graded C–F statement 4, graded F
- Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Québécois F statement 1, graded F
- Dominique O'Rourke Liberal B statement 1, graded B2 statement 2
- Kurt Holman Conservative 1 statement 1C+ statement 2, graded C+
- Marianne Dandurand Liberal 1 statement 1B statement 2, graded B
- Arpan Khanna Conservative 1 statement 1
- Ned Kuruc Conservative A statement 1, graded A2 statement 2A statement 3, graded AB+ statement 4, graded B+B– statement 5, graded B–B+ statement 6, graded B+
- Kristina Tesser Derksen Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+C+ statement 2, graded C+
- Mike Lake Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Iqra Khalid Liberal A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded A
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal F statement 1, graded F
- Gord Johns NDP A statement 1, graded AA statement 2, graded A
- Emma Harrison Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+C+ statement 2, graded C+B statement 3, graded BB statement 4, graded B
- Rhonda Kirkland Conservative A statement 1, graded A
- Stephanie McLean Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Jessica Fancy Liberal A statement 1, graded AC statement 2, graded CA– statement 3, graded A–A– statement 4, graded A–A+ statement 5, graded A+
- Rob Moore Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
-
1 member spoke
- Rob Moore Conservative A statement 1, graded A
-
12 members spoke
- Ginette Petitpas Taylor Liberal B statement 1, graded BB+ statement 2, graded B+A statement 3, graded A4 statement 4
- Rob Morrison Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Martin Champoux Bloc Québécois B+ statement 1, graded B+A– statement 2, graded A–
- Greg Fergus Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Juanita Nathan Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+A– statement 2, graded A–3 statement 34 statement 45 statement 5
- Tamara Jansen Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Québécois A– statement 1, graded A–
- Glen Motz Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+B statement 2, graded B
- Jeremy Patzer Conservative A statement 1, graded AB statement 2, graded BB– statement 3, graded B–B statement 4, graded B
- Jagsharan Singh Mahal Conservative A statement 1, graded A
- Luc Berthold Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
Time allocation, closure and other motions on the bill 2
-
Government Orders: Bill C-16-Notice of Time Allocation Motion
1 member spoke
- Ruby Sahota Liberal 1 statement 1
-
Protecting Victims Act: Bill C-16-Time Allocation Motion
14 members spoke
- Sean Fraser Liberal 1 statement 1A– statement 2, graded A–A– statement 3, graded A–A+ statement 4, graded A+5 statement 5A+ statement 6, graded A+A+ statement 7, graded A+A statement 8, graded AB statement 9, graded BB statement 10, graded BA statement 11, graded AA+ statement 12, graded A+B+ statement 13, graded B+A+ statement 14, graded A+A– statement 15, graded A–
- Larry Brock Conservative B statement 1, graded B2 statement 2A+ statement 3, graded A+
- Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Québécois A statement 1, graded A
- Roman Baber Conservative A statement 1, graded A
- Marilyn Gladu Liberal 1 statement 1
- Elizabeth May Green A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Frank Caputo Conservative A statement 1, graded A
- Laila Goodridge Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Gord Johns NDP A statement 1, graded A
- Gérard Deltell Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Amandeep Sodhi Liberal B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Blaine Calkins Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- James Bezan Conservative B– statement 1, graded B–
Also raised in 52
Question Period, members' statements and other debates where the bill came up.